Cargando…
Dynamic software design for clinical exome and genome analyses: insights from bioinformaticians, clinical geneticists, and genetic counselors
Background The transition of whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing (WES/WGS) from the research setting to routine clinical practice remains challenging. Objectives With almost no previous research specifically assessing interface designs and functionalities of WES and WGS software tools, the autho...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4784553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26117142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv053 |
_version_ | 1782420285574610944 |
---|---|
author | Shyr, Casper Kushniruk, Andre van Karnebeek, Clara D.M. Wasserman, Wyeth W. |
author_facet | Shyr, Casper Kushniruk, Andre van Karnebeek, Clara D.M. Wasserman, Wyeth W. |
author_sort | Shyr, Casper |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background The transition of whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing (WES/WGS) from the research setting to routine clinical practice remains challenging. Objectives With almost no previous research specifically assessing interface designs and functionalities of WES and WGS software tools, the authors set out to ascertain perspectives from healthcare professionals in distinct domains on optimal clinical genomics user interfaces. Methods A series of semi-scripted focus groups, structured around professional challenges encountered in clinical WES and WGS, were conducted with bioinformaticians (n = 8), clinical geneticists (n = 9), genetic counselors (n = 5), and general physicians (n = 4). Results Contrary to popular existing system designs, bioinformaticians preferred command line over graphical user interfaces for better software compatibility and customization flexibility. Clinical geneticists and genetic counselors desired an overarching interactive graphical layout to prioritize candidate variants—a “tiered” system where only functionalities relevant to the user domain are made accessible. They favored a system capable of retrieving consistent representations of external genetic information from third-party sources. To streamline collaboration and patient exchanges, the authors identified user requirements toward an automated reporting system capable of summarizing key evidence-based clinical findings among the vast array of technical details. Conclusions Successful adoption of a clinical WES/WGS system is heavily dependent on its ability to address the diverse necessities and predilections among specialists in distinct healthcare domains. Tailored software interfaces suitable for each group is likely more appropriate than the current popular “one size fits all” generic framework. This study provides interfaces for future intervention studies and software engineering opportunities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4784553 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47845532017-03-01 Dynamic software design for clinical exome and genome analyses: insights from bioinformaticians, clinical geneticists, and genetic counselors Shyr, Casper Kushniruk, Andre van Karnebeek, Clara D.M. Wasserman, Wyeth W. J Am Med Inform Assoc Research and Applications Background The transition of whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing (WES/WGS) from the research setting to routine clinical practice remains challenging. Objectives With almost no previous research specifically assessing interface designs and functionalities of WES and WGS software tools, the authors set out to ascertain perspectives from healthcare professionals in distinct domains on optimal clinical genomics user interfaces. Methods A series of semi-scripted focus groups, structured around professional challenges encountered in clinical WES and WGS, were conducted with bioinformaticians (n = 8), clinical geneticists (n = 9), genetic counselors (n = 5), and general physicians (n = 4). Results Contrary to popular existing system designs, bioinformaticians preferred command line over graphical user interfaces for better software compatibility and customization flexibility. Clinical geneticists and genetic counselors desired an overarching interactive graphical layout to prioritize candidate variants—a “tiered” system where only functionalities relevant to the user domain are made accessible. They favored a system capable of retrieving consistent representations of external genetic information from third-party sources. To streamline collaboration and patient exchanges, the authors identified user requirements toward an automated reporting system capable of summarizing key evidence-based clinical findings among the vast array of technical details. Conclusions Successful adoption of a clinical WES/WGS system is heavily dependent on its ability to address the diverse necessities and predilections among specialists in distinct healthcare domains. Tailored software interfaces suitable for each group is likely more appropriate than the current popular “one size fits all” generic framework. This study provides interfaces for future intervention studies and software engineering opportunities. Oxford University Press 2016-03 2015-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4784553/ /pubmed/26117142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv053 Text en © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Research and Applications Shyr, Casper Kushniruk, Andre van Karnebeek, Clara D.M. Wasserman, Wyeth W. Dynamic software design for clinical exome and genome analyses: insights from bioinformaticians, clinical geneticists, and genetic counselors |
title | Dynamic software design for clinical exome and genome analyses: insights from bioinformaticians, clinical geneticists, and genetic counselors |
title_full | Dynamic software design for clinical exome and genome analyses: insights from bioinformaticians, clinical geneticists, and genetic counselors |
title_fullStr | Dynamic software design for clinical exome and genome analyses: insights from bioinformaticians, clinical geneticists, and genetic counselors |
title_full_unstemmed | Dynamic software design for clinical exome and genome analyses: insights from bioinformaticians, clinical geneticists, and genetic counselors |
title_short | Dynamic software design for clinical exome and genome analyses: insights from bioinformaticians, clinical geneticists, and genetic counselors |
title_sort | dynamic software design for clinical exome and genome analyses: insights from bioinformaticians, clinical geneticists, and genetic counselors |
topic | Research and Applications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4784553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26117142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv053 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shyrcasper dynamicsoftwaredesignforclinicalexomeandgenomeanalysesinsightsfrombioinformaticiansclinicalgeneticistsandgeneticcounselors AT kushnirukandre dynamicsoftwaredesignforclinicalexomeandgenomeanalysesinsightsfrombioinformaticiansclinicalgeneticistsandgeneticcounselors AT vankarnebeekclaradm dynamicsoftwaredesignforclinicalexomeandgenomeanalysesinsightsfrombioinformaticiansclinicalgeneticistsandgeneticcounselors AT wassermanwyethw dynamicsoftwaredesignforclinicalexomeandgenomeanalysesinsightsfrombioinformaticiansclinicalgeneticistsandgeneticcounselors |