Cargando…

Impact of Background Noise and Sentence Complexity on Processing Demands during Sentence Comprehension

Speech comprehension in adverse listening conditions can be effortful even when speech is fully intelligible. Acoustical distortions typically make speech comprehension more effortful, but effort also depends on linguistic aspects of the speech signal, such as its syntactic complexity. In the presen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wendt, Dorothea, Dau, Torsten, Hjortkjær, Jens
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4785151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27014152
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00345
_version_ 1782420354654797824
author Wendt, Dorothea
Dau, Torsten
Hjortkjær, Jens
author_facet Wendt, Dorothea
Dau, Torsten
Hjortkjær, Jens
author_sort Wendt, Dorothea
collection PubMed
description Speech comprehension in adverse listening conditions can be effortful even when speech is fully intelligible. Acoustical distortions typically make speech comprehension more effortful, but effort also depends on linguistic aspects of the speech signal, such as its syntactic complexity. In the present study, pupil dilations, and subjective effort ratings were recorded in 20 normal-hearing participants while performing a sentence comprehension task. The sentences were either syntactically simple (subject-first sentence structure) or complex (object-first sentence structure) and were presented in two levels of background noise both corresponding to high intelligibility. A digit span and a reading span test were used to assess individual differences in the participants’ working memory capacity (WMC). The results showed that the subjectively rated effort was mostly affected by the noise level and less by syntactic complexity. Conversely, pupil dilations increased with syntactic complexity but only showed a small effect of the noise level. Participants with higher WMC showed increased pupil responses in the higher-level noise condition but rated sentence comprehension as being less effortful compared to participants with lower WMC. Overall, the results demonstrate that pupil dilations and subjectively rated effort represent different aspects of effort. Furthermore, the results indicate that effort can vary in situations with high speech intelligibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4785151
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47851512016-03-24 Impact of Background Noise and Sentence Complexity on Processing Demands during Sentence Comprehension Wendt, Dorothea Dau, Torsten Hjortkjær, Jens Front Psychol Psychology Speech comprehension in adverse listening conditions can be effortful even when speech is fully intelligible. Acoustical distortions typically make speech comprehension more effortful, but effort also depends on linguistic aspects of the speech signal, such as its syntactic complexity. In the present study, pupil dilations, and subjective effort ratings were recorded in 20 normal-hearing participants while performing a sentence comprehension task. The sentences were either syntactically simple (subject-first sentence structure) or complex (object-first sentence structure) and were presented in two levels of background noise both corresponding to high intelligibility. A digit span and a reading span test were used to assess individual differences in the participants’ working memory capacity (WMC). The results showed that the subjectively rated effort was mostly affected by the noise level and less by syntactic complexity. Conversely, pupil dilations increased with syntactic complexity but only showed a small effect of the noise level. Participants with higher WMC showed increased pupil responses in the higher-level noise condition but rated sentence comprehension as being less effortful compared to participants with lower WMC. Overall, the results demonstrate that pupil dilations and subjectively rated effort represent different aspects of effort. Furthermore, the results indicate that effort can vary in situations with high speech intelligibility. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4785151/ /pubmed/27014152 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00345 Text en Copyright © 2016 Wendt, Dau and Hjortkjær. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Wendt, Dorothea
Dau, Torsten
Hjortkjær, Jens
Impact of Background Noise and Sentence Complexity on Processing Demands during Sentence Comprehension
title Impact of Background Noise and Sentence Complexity on Processing Demands during Sentence Comprehension
title_full Impact of Background Noise and Sentence Complexity on Processing Demands during Sentence Comprehension
title_fullStr Impact of Background Noise and Sentence Complexity on Processing Demands during Sentence Comprehension
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Background Noise and Sentence Complexity on Processing Demands during Sentence Comprehension
title_short Impact of Background Noise and Sentence Complexity on Processing Demands during Sentence Comprehension
title_sort impact of background noise and sentence complexity on processing demands during sentence comprehension
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4785151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27014152
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00345
work_keys_str_mv AT wendtdorothea impactofbackgroundnoiseandsentencecomplexityonprocessingdemandsduringsentencecomprehension
AT dautorsten impactofbackgroundnoiseandsentencecomplexityonprocessingdemandsduringsentencecomprehension
AT hjortkjærjens impactofbackgroundnoiseandsentencecomplexityonprocessingdemandsduringsentencecomprehension