Cargando…

Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometer, Tono-Pen and noncontact tonometer in children

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the agreement of Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) with Tono-Pen and noncontact tonometer (NCT) for measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) in pediatric age group and to evaluate the correlation between central corneal thickness (CCT) and IOP measured with the tonometers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raina, Usha Kaul, Rathie, Neha, Gupta, Anika, Gupta, Shantanu Kumar, Thakar, Meenakshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4785703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27013824
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-620X.176096
_version_ 1782420450748399616
author Raina, Usha Kaul
Rathie, Neha
Gupta, Anika
Gupta, Shantanu Kumar
Thakar, Meenakshi
author_facet Raina, Usha Kaul
Rathie, Neha
Gupta, Anika
Gupta, Shantanu Kumar
Thakar, Meenakshi
author_sort Raina, Usha Kaul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the agreement of Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) with Tono-Pen and noncontact tonometer (NCT) for measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) in pediatric age group and to evaluate the correlation between central corneal thickness (CCT) and IOP measured with the tonometers used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: IOP was measured in 200 eyes in a group of Indian children, aged between 8 and 18 years using three different tonometers: NCT, the Tono-Pen and GAT. All IOP readings were made in the office settings by the same examiner. Readings obtained were compared between the instruments and with the CCT for each tonometer. Tonometer inter-method agreement was assessed by the Bland–Altmann method. The relations of CCT with absolute IOP values and inter-tonometer differences were analyzed by linear regression. RESULTS: The mean age was 13.37 ΁ 3.51 years. The mean IOP values recorded with NCT; Tono-Pen and GAT were 14.38, 15.63, and 12.44 mmHg, respectively. Both Tono-Pen and NCT recorded statistically higher IOP values than the GAT (P = 0.00) regardless of the CCT. The percentage increase of IOP measured over GAT was 15.66% for NCT and 25.70% for Tono-Pen which was also statistically significant. A correlation was found between CCT and IOP values obtained with all the three tonometers. CONCLUSION: IOP measurements on children vary significantly between instruments and correlations are affected by the corneal thickness. Further studies on children are needed to determine which instrument is most appropriate and to derive a normative IOP scale for the growing eye.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4785703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47857032016-03-24 Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometer, Tono-Pen and noncontact tonometer in children Raina, Usha Kaul Rathie, Neha Gupta, Anika Gupta, Shantanu Kumar Thakar, Meenakshi Oman J Ophthalmol Original Article BACKGROUND: To evaluate the agreement of Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) with Tono-Pen and noncontact tonometer (NCT) for measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) in pediatric age group and to evaluate the correlation between central corneal thickness (CCT) and IOP measured with the tonometers used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: IOP was measured in 200 eyes in a group of Indian children, aged between 8 and 18 years using three different tonometers: NCT, the Tono-Pen and GAT. All IOP readings were made in the office settings by the same examiner. Readings obtained were compared between the instruments and with the CCT for each tonometer. Tonometer inter-method agreement was assessed by the Bland–Altmann method. The relations of CCT with absolute IOP values and inter-tonometer differences were analyzed by linear regression. RESULTS: The mean age was 13.37 ΁ 3.51 years. The mean IOP values recorded with NCT; Tono-Pen and GAT were 14.38, 15.63, and 12.44 mmHg, respectively. Both Tono-Pen and NCT recorded statistically higher IOP values than the GAT (P = 0.00) regardless of the CCT. The percentage increase of IOP measured over GAT was 15.66% for NCT and 25.70% for Tono-Pen which was also statistically significant. A correlation was found between CCT and IOP values obtained with all the three tonometers. CONCLUSION: IOP measurements on children vary significantly between instruments and correlations are affected by the corneal thickness. Further studies on children are needed to determine which instrument is most appropriate and to derive a normative IOP scale for the growing eye. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4785703/ /pubmed/27013824 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-620X.176096 Text en Copyright: © Oman Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Raina, Usha Kaul
Rathie, Neha
Gupta, Anika
Gupta, Shantanu Kumar
Thakar, Meenakshi
Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometer, Tono-Pen and noncontact tonometer in children
title Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometer, Tono-Pen and noncontact tonometer in children
title_full Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometer, Tono-Pen and noncontact tonometer in children
title_fullStr Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometer, Tono-Pen and noncontact tonometer in children
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometer, Tono-Pen and noncontact tonometer in children
title_short Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometer, Tono-Pen and noncontact tonometer in children
title_sort comparison of goldmann applanation tonometer, tono-pen and noncontact tonometer in children
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4785703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27013824
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-620X.176096
work_keys_str_mv AT rainaushakaul comparisonofgoldmannapplanationtonometertonopenandnoncontacttonometerinchildren
AT rathieneha comparisonofgoldmannapplanationtonometertonopenandnoncontacttonometerinchildren
AT guptaanika comparisonofgoldmannapplanationtonometertonopenandnoncontacttonometerinchildren
AT guptashantanukumar comparisonofgoldmannapplanationtonometertonopenandnoncontacttonometerinchildren
AT thakarmeenakshi comparisonofgoldmannapplanationtonometertonopenandnoncontacttonometerinchildren