Cargando…

Dysphonia risk screening protocol

OBJECTIVE: To propose and test the applicability of a dysphonia risk screening protocol with score calculation in individuals with and without dysphonia. METHOD: This descriptive cross-sectional study included 365 individuals (41 children, 142 adult women, 91 adult men and 91 seniors) divided into a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nemr, Katia, Simões-Zenari, Marcia, da Trindade Duarte, João Marcos, Lobrigate, Karen Elena, Bagatini, Flavia Alves
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4785849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27074171
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2016(03)01
_version_ 1782420472410931200
author Nemr, Katia
Simões-Zenari, Marcia
da Trindade Duarte, João Marcos
Lobrigate, Karen Elena
Bagatini, Flavia Alves
author_facet Nemr, Katia
Simões-Zenari, Marcia
da Trindade Duarte, João Marcos
Lobrigate, Karen Elena
Bagatini, Flavia Alves
author_sort Nemr, Katia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To propose and test the applicability of a dysphonia risk screening protocol with score calculation in individuals with and without dysphonia. METHOD: This descriptive cross-sectional study included 365 individuals (41 children, 142 adult women, 91 adult men and 91 seniors) divided into a dysphonic group and a non-dysphonic group. The protocol consisted of 18 questions and a score was calculated using a 10-cm visual analog scale. The measured value on the visual analog scale was added to the overall score, along with other partial scores. Speech samples allowed for analysis/assessment of the overall degree of vocal deviation and initial definition of the respective groups and after six months, the separation of the groups was confirmed using an acoustic analysis. RESULTS: The mean total scores were different between the groups in all samples. Values ranged between 37.0 and 57.85 in the dysphonic group and between 12.95 and 19.28 in the non-dysphonic group, with overall means of 46.09 and 15.55, respectively. High sensitivity and specificity were demonstrated when discriminating between the groups with the following cut-off points: 22.50 (children), 29.25 (adult women), 22.75 (adult men), and 27.10 (seniors). CONCLUSION: The protocol demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating groups of individuals with and without dysphonia in different sample groups and is thus an effective instrument for use in voice clinics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4785849
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47858492016-03-18 Dysphonia risk screening protocol Nemr, Katia Simões-Zenari, Marcia da Trindade Duarte, João Marcos Lobrigate, Karen Elena Bagatini, Flavia Alves Clinics (Sao Paulo) Clinical Science OBJECTIVE: To propose and test the applicability of a dysphonia risk screening protocol with score calculation in individuals with and without dysphonia. METHOD: This descriptive cross-sectional study included 365 individuals (41 children, 142 adult women, 91 adult men and 91 seniors) divided into a dysphonic group and a non-dysphonic group. The protocol consisted of 18 questions and a score was calculated using a 10-cm visual analog scale. The measured value on the visual analog scale was added to the overall score, along with other partial scores. Speech samples allowed for analysis/assessment of the overall degree of vocal deviation and initial definition of the respective groups and after six months, the separation of the groups was confirmed using an acoustic analysis. RESULTS: The mean total scores were different between the groups in all samples. Values ranged between 37.0 and 57.85 in the dysphonic group and between 12.95 and 19.28 in the non-dysphonic group, with overall means of 46.09 and 15.55, respectively. High sensitivity and specificity were demonstrated when discriminating between the groups with the following cut-off points: 22.50 (children), 29.25 (adult women), 22.75 (adult men), and 27.10 (seniors). CONCLUSION: The protocol demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating groups of individuals with and without dysphonia in different sample groups and is thus an effective instrument for use in voice clinics. Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2016-03 2016-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4785849/ /pubmed/27074171 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2016(03)01 Text en Copyright © 2016 CLINICS http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Science
Nemr, Katia
Simões-Zenari, Marcia
da Trindade Duarte, João Marcos
Lobrigate, Karen Elena
Bagatini, Flavia Alves
Dysphonia risk screening protocol
title Dysphonia risk screening protocol
title_full Dysphonia risk screening protocol
title_fullStr Dysphonia risk screening protocol
title_full_unstemmed Dysphonia risk screening protocol
title_short Dysphonia risk screening protocol
title_sort dysphonia risk screening protocol
topic Clinical Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4785849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27074171
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2016(03)01
work_keys_str_mv AT nemrkatia dysphoniariskscreeningprotocol
AT simoeszenarimarcia dysphoniariskscreeningprotocol
AT datrindadeduartejoaomarcos dysphoniariskscreeningprotocol
AT lobrigatekarenelena dysphoniariskscreeningprotocol
AT bagatiniflaviaalves dysphoniariskscreeningprotocol