Cargando…

The Selective Advantage of Synonymous Codon Usage Bias in Salmonella

The genetic code in mRNA is redundant, with 61 sense codons translated into 20 different amino acids. Individual amino acids are encoded by up to six different codons but within codon families some are used more frequently than others. This phenomenon is referred to as synonymous codon usage bias. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brandis, Gerrit, Hughes, Diarmaid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4786093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26963725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005926
_version_ 1782420494004256768
author Brandis, Gerrit
Hughes, Diarmaid
author_facet Brandis, Gerrit
Hughes, Diarmaid
author_sort Brandis, Gerrit
collection PubMed
description The genetic code in mRNA is redundant, with 61 sense codons translated into 20 different amino acids. Individual amino acids are encoded by up to six different codons but within codon families some are used more frequently than others. This phenomenon is referred to as synonymous codon usage bias. The genomes of free-living unicellular organisms such as bacteria have an extreme codon usage bias and the degree of bias differs between genes within the same genome. The strong positive correlation between codon usage bias and gene expression levels in many microorganisms is attributed to selection for translational efficiency. However, this putative selective advantage has never been measured in bacteria and theoretical estimates vary widely. By systematically exchanging optimal codons for synonymous codons in the tuf genes we quantified the selective advantage of biased codon usage in highly expressed genes to be in the range 0.2–4.2 x 10(−4) per codon per generation. These data quantify for the first time the potential for selection on synonymous codon choice to drive genome-wide sequence evolution in bacteria, and in particular to optimize the sequences of highly expressed genes. This quantification may have predictive applications in the design of synthetic genes and for heterologous gene expression in biotechnology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4786093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47860932016-03-23 The Selective Advantage of Synonymous Codon Usage Bias in Salmonella Brandis, Gerrit Hughes, Diarmaid PLoS Genet Research Article The genetic code in mRNA is redundant, with 61 sense codons translated into 20 different amino acids. Individual amino acids are encoded by up to six different codons but within codon families some are used more frequently than others. This phenomenon is referred to as synonymous codon usage bias. The genomes of free-living unicellular organisms such as bacteria have an extreme codon usage bias and the degree of bias differs between genes within the same genome. The strong positive correlation between codon usage bias and gene expression levels in many microorganisms is attributed to selection for translational efficiency. However, this putative selective advantage has never been measured in bacteria and theoretical estimates vary widely. By systematically exchanging optimal codons for synonymous codons in the tuf genes we quantified the selective advantage of biased codon usage in highly expressed genes to be in the range 0.2–4.2 x 10(−4) per codon per generation. These data quantify for the first time the potential for selection on synonymous codon choice to drive genome-wide sequence evolution in bacteria, and in particular to optimize the sequences of highly expressed genes. This quantification may have predictive applications in the design of synthetic genes and for heterologous gene expression in biotechnology. Public Library of Science 2016-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4786093/ /pubmed/26963725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005926 Text en © 2016 Brandis, Hughes http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brandis, Gerrit
Hughes, Diarmaid
The Selective Advantage of Synonymous Codon Usage Bias in Salmonella
title The Selective Advantage of Synonymous Codon Usage Bias in Salmonella
title_full The Selective Advantage of Synonymous Codon Usage Bias in Salmonella
title_fullStr The Selective Advantage of Synonymous Codon Usage Bias in Salmonella
title_full_unstemmed The Selective Advantage of Synonymous Codon Usage Bias in Salmonella
title_short The Selective Advantage of Synonymous Codon Usage Bias in Salmonella
title_sort selective advantage of synonymous codon usage bias in salmonella
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4786093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26963725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005926
work_keys_str_mv AT brandisgerrit theselectiveadvantageofsynonymouscodonusagebiasinsalmonella
AT hughesdiarmaid theselectiveadvantageofsynonymouscodonusagebiasinsalmonella
AT brandisgerrit selectiveadvantageofsynonymouscodonusagebiasinsalmonella
AT hughesdiarmaid selectiveadvantageofsynonymouscodonusagebiasinsalmonella