Cargando…

Avian Assemblages at Bird Baths: A Comparison of Urban and Rural Bird Baths in Australia

Private gardens provide habitat and resources for many birds living in human-dominated landscapes. While wild bird feeding is recognised as one of the most popular forms of human-wildlife interaction, almost nothing is known about the use of bird baths. This citizen science initiative explores avian...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cleary, Gráinne P., Parsons, Holly, Davis, Adrian, Coleman, Bill R., Jones, Darryl N., Miller, Kelly K., Weston, Michael A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4786105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26962857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150899
_version_ 1782420496703291392
author Cleary, Gráinne P.
Parsons, Holly
Davis, Adrian
Coleman, Bill R.
Jones, Darryl N.
Miller, Kelly K.
Weston, Michael A.
author_facet Cleary, Gráinne P.
Parsons, Holly
Davis, Adrian
Coleman, Bill R.
Jones, Darryl N.
Miller, Kelly K.
Weston, Michael A.
author_sort Cleary, Gráinne P.
collection PubMed
description Private gardens provide habitat and resources for many birds living in human-dominated landscapes. While wild bird feeding is recognised as one of the most popular forms of human-wildlife interaction, almost nothing is known about the use of bird baths. This citizen science initiative explores avian assemblages at bird baths in private gardens in south-eastern Australia and how this differs with respect to levels of urbanisation and bioregion. Overall, 992 citizen scientists collected data over two, four-week survey periods during winter 2014 and summer 2015 (43% participated in both years). Avian assemblages at urban and rural bird baths differed between bioregions with aggressive nectar-eating species influenced the avian assemblages visiting urban bird baths in South Eastern Queensland, NSW North Coast and Sydney Basin while introduced birds contributed to differences in South Western Slopes, Southern Volcanic Plains and Victorian Midlands. Small honeyeaters and other small native birds occurred less often at urban bird baths compared to rural bird baths. Our results suggest that differences between urban versus rural areas, as well as bioregion, significantly influence the composition of avian assemblages visiting bird baths in private gardens. We also demonstrate that citizen science monitoring of fixed survey sites such as bird baths is a useful tool in understanding large-scale patterns in avian assemblages which requires a vast amount of data to be collected across broad areas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4786105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47861052016-03-23 Avian Assemblages at Bird Baths: A Comparison of Urban and Rural Bird Baths in Australia Cleary, Gráinne P. Parsons, Holly Davis, Adrian Coleman, Bill R. Jones, Darryl N. Miller, Kelly K. Weston, Michael A. PLoS One Research Article Private gardens provide habitat and resources for many birds living in human-dominated landscapes. While wild bird feeding is recognised as one of the most popular forms of human-wildlife interaction, almost nothing is known about the use of bird baths. This citizen science initiative explores avian assemblages at bird baths in private gardens in south-eastern Australia and how this differs with respect to levels of urbanisation and bioregion. Overall, 992 citizen scientists collected data over two, four-week survey periods during winter 2014 and summer 2015 (43% participated in both years). Avian assemblages at urban and rural bird baths differed between bioregions with aggressive nectar-eating species influenced the avian assemblages visiting urban bird baths in South Eastern Queensland, NSW North Coast and Sydney Basin while introduced birds contributed to differences in South Western Slopes, Southern Volcanic Plains and Victorian Midlands. Small honeyeaters and other small native birds occurred less often at urban bird baths compared to rural bird baths. Our results suggest that differences between urban versus rural areas, as well as bioregion, significantly influence the composition of avian assemblages visiting bird baths in private gardens. We also demonstrate that citizen science monitoring of fixed survey sites such as bird baths is a useful tool in understanding large-scale patterns in avian assemblages which requires a vast amount of data to be collected across broad areas. Public Library of Science 2016-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4786105/ /pubmed/26962857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150899 Text en © 2016 Cleary et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cleary, Gráinne P.
Parsons, Holly
Davis, Adrian
Coleman, Bill R.
Jones, Darryl N.
Miller, Kelly K.
Weston, Michael A.
Avian Assemblages at Bird Baths: A Comparison of Urban and Rural Bird Baths in Australia
title Avian Assemblages at Bird Baths: A Comparison of Urban and Rural Bird Baths in Australia
title_full Avian Assemblages at Bird Baths: A Comparison of Urban and Rural Bird Baths in Australia
title_fullStr Avian Assemblages at Bird Baths: A Comparison of Urban and Rural Bird Baths in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Avian Assemblages at Bird Baths: A Comparison of Urban and Rural Bird Baths in Australia
title_short Avian Assemblages at Bird Baths: A Comparison of Urban and Rural Bird Baths in Australia
title_sort avian assemblages at bird baths: a comparison of urban and rural bird baths in australia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4786105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26962857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150899
work_keys_str_mv AT clearygrainnep avianassemblagesatbirdbathsacomparisonofurbanandruralbirdbathsinaustralia
AT parsonsholly avianassemblagesatbirdbathsacomparisonofurbanandruralbirdbathsinaustralia
AT davisadrian avianassemblagesatbirdbathsacomparisonofurbanandruralbirdbathsinaustralia
AT colemanbillr avianassemblagesatbirdbathsacomparisonofurbanandruralbirdbathsinaustralia
AT jonesdarryln avianassemblagesatbirdbathsacomparisonofurbanandruralbirdbathsinaustralia
AT millerkellyk avianassemblagesatbirdbathsacomparisonofurbanandruralbirdbathsinaustralia
AT westonmichaela avianassemblagesatbirdbathsacomparisonofurbanandruralbirdbathsinaustralia