Cargando…

There’s an App for That? Highlighting the Difficulty in Finding Clinically Relevant Smartphone Applications

INTRODUCTION: The use of personal mobile devices in the medical field has grown quickly, and a large proportion of physicians use their mobile devices as an immediate resource for clinical decision-making, prescription information and other medical information. The iTunes App Store (Apple, Inc.) con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wiechmann, Warren, Kwan, Daniel, Bokarius, Andrew, Toohey, Shannon L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4786244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26973750
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2015.12.28781
_version_ 1782420522335731712
author Wiechmann, Warren
Kwan, Daniel
Bokarius, Andrew
Toohey, Shannon L.
author_facet Wiechmann, Warren
Kwan, Daniel
Bokarius, Andrew
Toohey, Shannon L.
author_sort Wiechmann, Warren
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The use of personal mobile devices in the medical field has grown quickly, and a large proportion of physicians use their mobile devices as an immediate resource for clinical decision-making, prescription information and other medical information. The iTunes App Store (Apple, Inc.) contains approximately 20,000 apps in its “Medical” category, providing a robust repository of resources for clinicians; however, this represents only 2% of the entire App Store. The App Store does not have strict criteria for identifying content specific to practicing physicians, making the identification of clinically relevant content difficult. The objective of this study is to quantify the characteristics of existing medical applications in the iTunes App Store that could be used by emergency physicians, residents, or medical students. METHODS: We found applications related to emergency medicine (EM) by searching the iTunes App Store for 21 terms representing core content areas of EM, such as “emergency medicine,” “critical care,” “orthopedics,” and “procedures.” Two physicians independently reviewed descriptions of these applications in the App Store and categorized each as the following: Clinically Relevant, Book/Published Source, Non-English, Study Tools, or Not Relevant. A third physician reviewer resolved disagreements about categorization. Descriptive statistics were calculated. RESULTS: We found a total of 7,699 apps from the 21 search terms, of which 17.8% were clinical, 9.6% were based on a book or published source, 1.6% were non-English, 0.7% were clinically relevant patient education resources, and 4.8% were study tools. Most significantly, 64.9% were considered not relevant to medical professionals. Clinically relevant apps make up approximately 6.9% of the App Store’s “Medical” Category and 0.1% of the overall App Store. CONCLUSION: Clinically relevant apps represent only a small percentage (6.9%) of the total App volume within the Medical section of the App Store. Without a structured search-and-evaluation strategy, it may be difficult for the casual user to identify this potentially useful content. Given the increasing adoption of devices in healthcare, national EM associations should consider curating these resources for their members.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4786244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47862442016-03-11 There’s an App for That? Highlighting the Difficulty in Finding Clinically Relevant Smartphone Applications Wiechmann, Warren Kwan, Daniel Bokarius, Andrew Toohey, Shannon L. West J Emerg Med Technology in Emergency Medicine INTRODUCTION: The use of personal mobile devices in the medical field has grown quickly, and a large proportion of physicians use their mobile devices as an immediate resource for clinical decision-making, prescription information and other medical information. The iTunes App Store (Apple, Inc.) contains approximately 20,000 apps in its “Medical” category, providing a robust repository of resources for clinicians; however, this represents only 2% of the entire App Store. The App Store does not have strict criteria for identifying content specific to practicing physicians, making the identification of clinically relevant content difficult. The objective of this study is to quantify the characteristics of existing medical applications in the iTunes App Store that could be used by emergency physicians, residents, or medical students. METHODS: We found applications related to emergency medicine (EM) by searching the iTunes App Store for 21 terms representing core content areas of EM, such as “emergency medicine,” “critical care,” “orthopedics,” and “procedures.” Two physicians independently reviewed descriptions of these applications in the App Store and categorized each as the following: Clinically Relevant, Book/Published Source, Non-English, Study Tools, or Not Relevant. A third physician reviewer resolved disagreements about categorization. Descriptive statistics were calculated. RESULTS: We found a total of 7,699 apps from the 21 search terms, of which 17.8% were clinical, 9.6% were based on a book or published source, 1.6% were non-English, 0.7% were clinically relevant patient education resources, and 4.8% were study tools. Most significantly, 64.9% were considered not relevant to medical professionals. Clinically relevant apps make up approximately 6.9% of the App Store’s “Medical” Category and 0.1% of the overall App Store. CONCLUSION: Clinically relevant apps represent only a small percentage (6.9%) of the total App volume within the Medical section of the App Store. Without a structured search-and-evaluation strategy, it may be difficult for the casual user to identify this potentially useful content. Given the increasing adoption of devices in healthcare, national EM associations should consider curating these resources for their members. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2016-03 2016-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4786244/ /pubmed/26973750 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2015.12.28781 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Wiechmann et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Technology in Emergency Medicine
Wiechmann, Warren
Kwan, Daniel
Bokarius, Andrew
Toohey, Shannon L.
There’s an App for That? Highlighting the Difficulty in Finding Clinically Relevant Smartphone Applications
title There’s an App for That? Highlighting the Difficulty in Finding Clinically Relevant Smartphone Applications
title_full There’s an App for That? Highlighting the Difficulty in Finding Clinically Relevant Smartphone Applications
title_fullStr There’s an App for That? Highlighting the Difficulty in Finding Clinically Relevant Smartphone Applications
title_full_unstemmed There’s an App for That? Highlighting the Difficulty in Finding Clinically Relevant Smartphone Applications
title_short There’s an App for That? Highlighting the Difficulty in Finding Clinically Relevant Smartphone Applications
title_sort there’s an app for that? highlighting the difficulty in finding clinically relevant smartphone applications
topic Technology in Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4786244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26973750
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2015.12.28781
work_keys_str_mv AT wiechmannwarren theresanappforthathighlightingthedifficultyinfindingclinicallyrelevantsmartphoneapplications
AT kwandaniel theresanappforthathighlightingthedifficultyinfindingclinicallyrelevantsmartphoneapplications
AT bokariusandrew theresanappforthathighlightingthedifficultyinfindingclinicallyrelevantsmartphoneapplications
AT tooheyshannonl theresanappforthathighlightingthedifficultyinfindingclinicallyrelevantsmartphoneapplications