Cargando…

Using Seroprevalence and Immunisation Coverage Data to Estimate the Global Burden of Congenital Rubella Syndrome, 1996-2010: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: The burden of Congenital Rubella Syndrome (CRS) is typically underestimated in routine surveillance. Updated estimates are needed following the recent WHO position paper on rubella and recent GAVI initiatives, funding rubella vaccination in eligible countries. Previous estimates consider...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vynnycky, Emilia, Adams, Elisabeth J., Cutts, Felicity T., Reef, Susan E., Navar, Ann Marie, Simons, Emily, Yoshida, Lay-Myint, Brown, David W. J., Jackson, Charlotte, Strebel, Peter M., Dabbagh, Alya J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4786291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26962867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149160
_version_ 1782420533193736192
author Vynnycky, Emilia
Adams, Elisabeth J.
Cutts, Felicity T.
Reef, Susan E.
Navar, Ann Marie
Simons, Emily
Yoshida, Lay-Myint
Brown, David W. J.
Jackson, Charlotte
Strebel, Peter M.
Dabbagh, Alya J.
author_facet Vynnycky, Emilia
Adams, Elisabeth J.
Cutts, Felicity T.
Reef, Susan E.
Navar, Ann Marie
Simons, Emily
Yoshida, Lay-Myint
Brown, David W. J.
Jackson, Charlotte
Strebel, Peter M.
Dabbagh, Alya J.
author_sort Vynnycky, Emilia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The burden of Congenital Rubella Syndrome (CRS) is typically underestimated in routine surveillance. Updated estimates are needed following the recent WHO position paper on rubella and recent GAVI initiatives, funding rubella vaccination in eligible countries. Previous estimates considered the year 1996 and only 78 (developing) countries. METHODS: We reviewed the literature to identify rubella seroprevalence studies conducted before countries introduced rubella-containing vaccination (RCV). These data and the estimated vaccination coverage in the routine schedule and mass campaigns were incorporated in mathematical models to estimate the CRS incidence in 1996 and 2000–2010 for each country, region and globally. RESULTS: The estimated CRS decreased in the three regions (Americas, Europe and Eastern Mediterranean) which had introduced widespread RCV by 2010, reaching <2 per 100,000 live births (the Americas and Europe) and 25 (95% CI 4–61) per 100,000 live births (the Eastern Mediterranean). The estimated incidence in 2010 ranged from 90 (95% CI: 46–195) in the Western Pacific, excluding China, to 116 (95% CI: 56–235) and 121 (95% CI: 31–238) per 100,000 live births in Africa and SE Asia respectively. Highest numbers of cases were predicted in Africa (39,000, 95% CI: 18,000–80,000) and SE Asia (49,000, 95% CI: 11,000–97,000). In 2010, 105,000 (95% CI: 54,000–158,000) CRS cases were estimated globally, compared to 119,000 (95% CI: 72,000–169,000) in 1996. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst falling dramatically in the Americas, Europe and the Eastern Mediterranean after vaccination, the estimated CRS incidence remains high elsewhere. Well-conducted seroprevalence studies can help to improve the reliability of these estimates and monitor the impact of rubella vaccination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4786291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47862912016-03-23 Using Seroprevalence and Immunisation Coverage Data to Estimate the Global Burden of Congenital Rubella Syndrome, 1996-2010: A Systematic Review Vynnycky, Emilia Adams, Elisabeth J. Cutts, Felicity T. Reef, Susan E. Navar, Ann Marie Simons, Emily Yoshida, Lay-Myint Brown, David W. J. Jackson, Charlotte Strebel, Peter M. Dabbagh, Alya J. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The burden of Congenital Rubella Syndrome (CRS) is typically underestimated in routine surveillance. Updated estimates are needed following the recent WHO position paper on rubella and recent GAVI initiatives, funding rubella vaccination in eligible countries. Previous estimates considered the year 1996 and only 78 (developing) countries. METHODS: We reviewed the literature to identify rubella seroprevalence studies conducted before countries introduced rubella-containing vaccination (RCV). These data and the estimated vaccination coverage in the routine schedule and mass campaigns were incorporated in mathematical models to estimate the CRS incidence in 1996 and 2000–2010 for each country, region and globally. RESULTS: The estimated CRS decreased in the three regions (Americas, Europe and Eastern Mediterranean) which had introduced widespread RCV by 2010, reaching <2 per 100,000 live births (the Americas and Europe) and 25 (95% CI 4–61) per 100,000 live births (the Eastern Mediterranean). The estimated incidence in 2010 ranged from 90 (95% CI: 46–195) in the Western Pacific, excluding China, to 116 (95% CI: 56–235) and 121 (95% CI: 31–238) per 100,000 live births in Africa and SE Asia respectively. Highest numbers of cases were predicted in Africa (39,000, 95% CI: 18,000–80,000) and SE Asia (49,000, 95% CI: 11,000–97,000). In 2010, 105,000 (95% CI: 54,000–158,000) CRS cases were estimated globally, compared to 119,000 (95% CI: 72,000–169,000) in 1996. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst falling dramatically in the Americas, Europe and the Eastern Mediterranean after vaccination, the estimated CRS incidence remains high elsewhere. Well-conducted seroprevalence studies can help to improve the reliability of these estimates and monitor the impact of rubella vaccination. Public Library of Science 2016-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4786291/ /pubmed/26962867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149160 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vynnycky, Emilia
Adams, Elisabeth J.
Cutts, Felicity T.
Reef, Susan E.
Navar, Ann Marie
Simons, Emily
Yoshida, Lay-Myint
Brown, David W. J.
Jackson, Charlotte
Strebel, Peter M.
Dabbagh, Alya J.
Using Seroprevalence and Immunisation Coverage Data to Estimate the Global Burden of Congenital Rubella Syndrome, 1996-2010: A Systematic Review
title Using Seroprevalence and Immunisation Coverage Data to Estimate the Global Burden of Congenital Rubella Syndrome, 1996-2010: A Systematic Review
title_full Using Seroprevalence and Immunisation Coverage Data to Estimate the Global Burden of Congenital Rubella Syndrome, 1996-2010: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Using Seroprevalence and Immunisation Coverage Data to Estimate the Global Burden of Congenital Rubella Syndrome, 1996-2010: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Using Seroprevalence and Immunisation Coverage Data to Estimate the Global Burden of Congenital Rubella Syndrome, 1996-2010: A Systematic Review
title_short Using Seroprevalence and Immunisation Coverage Data to Estimate the Global Burden of Congenital Rubella Syndrome, 1996-2010: A Systematic Review
title_sort using seroprevalence and immunisation coverage data to estimate the global burden of congenital rubella syndrome, 1996-2010: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4786291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26962867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149160
work_keys_str_mv AT vynnyckyemilia usingseroprevalenceandimmunisationcoveragedatatoestimatetheglobalburdenofcongenitalrubellasyndrome19962010asystematicreview
AT adamselisabethj usingseroprevalenceandimmunisationcoveragedatatoestimatetheglobalburdenofcongenitalrubellasyndrome19962010asystematicreview
AT cuttsfelicityt usingseroprevalenceandimmunisationcoveragedatatoestimatetheglobalburdenofcongenitalrubellasyndrome19962010asystematicreview
AT reefsusane usingseroprevalenceandimmunisationcoveragedatatoestimatetheglobalburdenofcongenitalrubellasyndrome19962010asystematicreview
AT navarannmarie usingseroprevalenceandimmunisationcoveragedatatoestimatetheglobalburdenofcongenitalrubellasyndrome19962010asystematicreview
AT simonsemily usingseroprevalenceandimmunisationcoveragedatatoestimatetheglobalburdenofcongenitalrubellasyndrome19962010asystematicreview
AT yoshidalaymyint usingseroprevalenceandimmunisationcoveragedatatoestimatetheglobalburdenofcongenitalrubellasyndrome19962010asystematicreview
AT browndavidwj usingseroprevalenceandimmunisationcoveragedatatoestimatetheglobalburdenofcongenitalrubellasyndrome19962010asystematicreview
AT jacksoncharlotte usingseroprevalenceandimmunisationcoveragedatatoestimatetheglobalburdenofcongenitalrubellasyndrome19962010asystematicreview
AT strebelpeterm usingseroprevalenceandimmunisationcoveragedatatoestimatetheglobalburdenofcongenitalrubellasyndrome19962010asystematicreview
AT dabbaghalyaj usingseroprevalenceandimmunisationcoveragedatatoestimatetheglobalburdenofcongenitalrubellasyndrome19962010asystematicreview