Cargando…

Comparison of Objective Measures for Predicting Perceptual Balance and Visual Aesthetic Preference

The aesthetic appreciation of a picture largely depends on the perceptual balance of its elements. The underlying mental mechanisms of this relation, however, are still poorly understood. For investigating these mechanisms, objective measures of balance have been constructed, such as the Assessment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hübner, Ronald, Fillinger, Martin G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4786554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27014143
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00335
_version_ 1782420563502825472
author Hübner, Ronald
Fillinger, Martin G.
author_facet Hübner, Ronald
Fillinger, Martin G.
author_sort Hübner, Ronald
collection PubMed
description The aesthetic appreciation of a picture largely depends on the perceptual balance of its elements. The underlying mental mechanisms of this relation, however, are still poorly understood. For investigating these mechanisms, objective measures of balance have been constructed, such as the Assessment of Preference for Balance (APB) score of Wilson and Chatterjee (2005). In the present study we examined the APB measure and compared it to an alternative measure (DCM; Deviation of the Center of “Mass”) that represents the center of perceptual “mass” in a picture and its deviation from the geometric center. Additionally, we applied measures of homogeneity and of mirror symmetry. In a first experiment participants had to rate the balance and symmetry of simple pictures, whereas in a second experiment different participants rated their preference (liking) for these pictures. In a third experiment participants rated the balance as well as the preference of new pictures. Altogether, the results show that DCM scores accounted better for balance ratings than APB scores, whereas the opposite held with respect to preference. Detailed analyses revealed that these results were due to the fact that aesthetic preference does not only depend on balance but also on homogeneity, and that the APB measure takes this feature into account.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4786554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47865542016-03-24 Comparison of Objective Measures for Predicting Perceptual Balance and Visual Aesthetic Preference Hübner, Ronald Fillinger, Martin G. Front Psychol Psychology The aesthetic appreciation of a picture largely depends on the perceptual balance of its elements. The underlying mental mechanisms of this relation, however, are still poorly understood. For investigating these mechanisms, objective measures of balance have been constructed, such as the Assessment of Preference for Balance (APB) score of Wilson and Chatterjee (2005). In the present study we examined the APB measure and compared it to an alternative measure (DCM; Deviation of the Center of “Mass”) that represents the center of perceptual “mass” in a picture and its deviation from the geometric center. Additionally, we applied measures of homogeneity and of mirror symmetry. In a first experiment participants had to rate the balance and symmetry of simple pictures, whereas in a second experiment different participants rated their preference (liking) for these pictures. In a third experiment participants rated the balance as well as the preference of new pictures. Altogether, the results show that DCM scores accounted better for balance ratings than APB scores, whereas the opposite held with respect to preference. Detailed analyses revealed that these results were due to the fact that aesthetic preference does not only depend on balance but also on homogeneity, and that the APB measure takes this feature into account. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4786554/ /pubmed/27014143 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00335 Text en Copyright © 2016 Hübner and Fillinger. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Hübner, Ronald
Fillinger, Martin G.
Comparison of Objective Measures for Predicting Perceptual Balance and Visual Aesthetic Preference
title Comparison of Objective Measures for Predicting Perceptual Balance and Visual Aesthetic Preference
title_full Comparison of Objective Measures for Predicting Perceptual Balance and Visual Aesthetic Preference
title_fullStr Comparison of Objective Measures for Predicting Perceptual Balance and Visual Aesthetic Preference
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Objective Measures for Predicting Perceptual Balance and Visual Aesthetic Preference
title_short Comparison of Objective Measures for Predicting Perceptual Balance and Visual Aesthetic Preference
title_sort comparison of objective measures for predicting perceptual balance and visual aesthetic preference
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4786554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27014143
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00335
work_keys_str_mv AT hubnerronald comparisonofobjectivemeasuresforpredictingperceptualbalanceandvisualaestheticpreference
AT fillingermarting comparisonofobjectivemeasuresforpredictingperceptualbalanceandvisualaestheticpreference