Cargando…

Does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? A systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies

By reducing energy density, low-energy sweeteners (LES) might be expected to reduce energy intake (EI) and body weight (BW). To assess the totality of the evidence testing the null hypothesis that LES exposure (versus sugars or unsweetened alternatives) has no effect on EI or BW, we conducted a syst...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rogers, P J, Hogenkamp, P S, de Graaf, C, Higgs, S, Lluch, A, Ness, A R, Penfold, C, Perry, R, Putz, P, Yeomans, M R, Mela, D J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4786736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26365102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2015.177
_version_ 1782420591236612096
author Rogers, P J
Hogenkamp, P S
de Graaf, C
Higgs, S
Lluch, A
Ness, A R
Penfold, C
Perry, R
Putz, P
Yeomans, M R
Mela, D J
author_facet Rogers, P J
Hogenkamp, P S
de Graaf, C
Higgs, S
Lluch, A
Ness, A R
Penfold, C
Perry, R
Putz, P
Yeomans, M R
Mela, D J
author_sort Rogers, P J
collection PubMed
description By reducing energy density, low-energy sweeteners (LES) might be expected to reduce energy intake (EI) and body weight (BW). To assess the totality of the evidence testing the null hypothesis that LES exposure (versus sugars or unsweetened alternatives) has no effect on EI or BW, we conducted a systematic review of relevant studies in animals and humans consuming LES with ad libitum access to food energy. In 62 of 90 animal studies exposure to LES did not affect or decreased BW. Of 28 reporting increased BW, 19 compared LES with glucose exposure using a specific ‘learning' paradigm. Twelve prospective cohort studies in humans reported inconsistent associations between LES use and body mass index (−0.002 kg m(−)(2) per year, 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.009 to 0.005). Meta-analysis of short-term randomized controlled trials (129 comparisons) showed reduced total EI for LES versus sugar-sweetened food or beverage consumption before an ad libitum meal (−94 kcal, 95% CI −122 to −66), with no difference versus water (−2 kcal, 95% CI −30 to 26). This was consistent with EI results from sustained intervention randomized controlled trials (10 comparisons). Meta-analysis of sustained intervention randomized controlled trials (4 weeks to 40 months) showed that consumption of LES versus sugar led to relatively reduced BW (nine comparisons; −1.35 kg, 95% CI –2.28 to −0.42), and a similar relative reduction in BW versus water (three comparisons; −1.24 kg, 95% CI –2.22 to −0.26). Most animal studies did not mimic LES consumption by humans, and reverse causation may influence the results of prospective cohort studies. The preponderance of evidence from all human randomized controlled trials indicates that LES do not increase EI or BW, whether compared with caloric or non-caloric (for example, water) control conditions. Overall, the balance of evidence indicates that use of LES in place of sugar, in children and adults, leads to reduced EI and BW, and possibly also when compared with water.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4786736
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47867362016-03-16 Does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? A systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies Rogers, P J Hogenkamp, P S de Graaf, C Higgs, S Lluch, A Ness, A R Penfold, C Perry, R Putz, P Yeomans, M R Mela, D J Int J Obes (Lond) Review By reducing energy density, low-energy sweeteners (LES) might be expected to reduce energy intake (EI) and body weight (BW). To assess the totality of the evidence testing the null hypothesis that LES exposure (versus sugars or unsweetened alternatives) has no effect on EI or BW, we conducted a systematic review of relevant studies in animals and humans consuming LES with ad libitum access to food energy. In 62 of 90 animal studies exposure to LES did not affect or decreased BW. Of 28 reporting increased BW, 19 compared LES with glucose exposure using a specific ‘learning' paradigm. Twelve prospective cohort studies in humans reported inconsistent associations between LES use and body mass index (−0.002 kg m(−)(2) per year, 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.009 to 0.005). Meta-analysis of short-term randomized controlled trials (129 comparisons) showed reduced total EI for LES versus sugar-sweetened food or beverage consumption before an ad libitum meal (−94 kcal, 95% CI −122 to −66), with no difference versus water (−2 kcal, 95% CI −30 to 26). This was consistent with EI results from sustained intervention randomized controlled trials (10 comparisons). Meta-analysis of sustained intervention randomized controlled trials (4 weeks to 40 months) showed that consumption of LES versus sugar led to relatively reduced BW (nine comparisons; −1.35 kg, 95% CI –2.28 to −0.42), and a similar relative reduction in BW versus water (three comparisons; −1.24 kg, 95% CI –2.22 to −0.26). Most animal studies did not mimic LES consumption by humans, and reverse causation may influence the results of prospective cohort studies. The preponderance of evidence from all human randomized controlled trials indicates that LES do not increase EI or BW, whether compared with caloric or non-caloric (for example, water) control conditions. Overall, the balance of evidence indicates that use of LES in place of sugar, in children and adults, leads to reduced EI and BW, and possibly also when compared with water. Nature Publishing Group 2016-03 2015-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4786736/ /pubmed/26365102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2015.177 Text en Copyright © 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article#amp;#x02019;s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Review
Rogers, P J
Hogenkamp, P S
de Graaf, C
Higgs, S
Lluch, A
Ness, A R
Penfold, C
Perry, R
Putz, P
Yeomans, M R
Mela, D J
Does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? A systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies
title Does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? A systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies
title_full Does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? A systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies
title_fullStr Does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? A systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies
title_full_unstemmed Does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? A systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies
title_short Does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? A systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies
title_sort does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? a systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4786736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26365102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2015.177
work_keys_str_mv AT rogerspj doeslowenergysweetenerconsumptionaffectenergyintakeandbodyweightasystematicreviewincludingmetaanalysesoftheevidencefromhumanandanimalstudies
AT hogenkampps doeslowenergysweetenerconsumptionaffectenergyintakeandbodyweightasystematicreviewincludingmetaanalysesoftheevidencefromhumanandanimalstudies
AT degraafc doeslowenergysweetenerconsumptionaffectenergyintakeandbodyweightasystematicreviewincludingmetaanalysesoftheevidencefromhumanandanimalstudies
AT higgss doeslowenergysweetenerconsumptionaffectenergyintakeandbodyweightasystematicreviewincludingmetaanalysesoftheevidencefromhumanandanimalstudies
AT llucha doeslowenergysweetenerconsumptionaffectenergyintakeandbodyweightasystematicreviewincludingmetaanalysesoftheevidencefromhumanandanimalstudies
AT nessar doeslowenergysweetenerconsumptionaffectenergyintakeandbodyweightasystematicreviewincludingmetaanalysesoftheevidencefromhumanandanimalstudies
AT penfoldc doeslowenergysweetenerconsumptionaffectenergyintakeandbodyweightasystematicreviewincludingmetaanalysesoftheevidencefromhumanandanimalstudies
AT perryr doeslowenergysweetenerconsumptionaffectenergyintakeandbodyweightasystematicreviewincludingmetaanalysesoftheevidencefromhumanandanimalstudies
AT putzp doeslowenergysweetenerconsumptionaffectenergyintakeandbodyweightasystematicreviewincludingmetaanalysesoftheevidencefromhumanandanimalstudies
AT yeomansmr doeslowenergysweetenerconsumptionaffectenergyintakeandbodyweightasystematicreviewincludingmetaanalysesoftheevidencefromhumanandanimalstudies
AT meladj doeslowenergysweetenerconsumptionaffectenergyintakeandbodyweightasystematicreviewincludingmetaanalysesoftheevidencefromhumanandanimalstudies