Cargando…
Does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? A systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies
By reducing energy density, low-energy sweeteners (LES) might be expected to reduce energy intake (EI) and body weight (BW). To assess the totality of the evidence testing the null hypothesis that LES exposure (versus sugars or unsweetened alternatives) has no effect on EI or BW, we conducted a syst...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4786736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26365102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2015.177 |
_version_ | 1782420591236612096 |
---|---|
author | Rogers, P J Hogenkamp, P S de Graaf, C Higgs, S Lluch, A Ness, A R Penfold, C Perry, R Putz, P Yeomans, M R Mela, D J |
author_facet | Rogers, P J Hogenkamp, P S de Graaf, C Higgs, S Lluch, A Ness, A R Penfold, C Perry, R Putz, P Yeomans, M R Mela, D J |
author_sort | Rogers, P J |
collection | PubMed |
description | By reducing energy density, low-energy sweeteners (LES) might be expected to reduce energy intake (EI) and body weight (BW). To assess the totality of the evidence testing the null hypothesis that LES exposure (versus sugars or unsweetened alternatives) has no effect on EI or BW, we conducted a systematic review of relevant studies in animals and humans consuming LES with ad libitum access to food energy. In 62 of 90 animal studies exposure to LES did not affect or decreased BW. Of 28 reporting increased BW, 19 compared LES with glucose exposure using a specific ‘learning' paradigm. Twelve prospective cohort studies in humans reported inconsistent associations between LES use and body mass index (−0.002 kg m(−)(2) per year, 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.009 to 0.005). Meta-analysis of short-term randomized controlled trials (129 comparisons) showed reduced total EI for LES versus sugar-sweetened food or beverage consumption before an ad libitum meal (−94 kcal, 95% CI −122 to −66), with no difference versus water (−2 kcal, 95% CI −30 to 26). This was consistent with EI results from sustained intervention randomized controlled trials (10 comparisons). Meta-analysis of sustained intervention randomized controlled trials (4 weeks to 40 months) showed that consumption of LES versus sugar led to relatively reduced BW (nine comparisons; −1.35 kg, 95% CI –2.28 to −0.42), and a similar relative reduction in BW versus water (three comparisons; −1.24 kg, 95% CI –2.22 to −0.26). Most animal studies did not mimic LES consumption by humans, and reverse causation may influence the results of prospective cohort studies. The preponderance of evidence from all human randomized controlled trials indicates that LES do not increase EI or BW, whether compared with caloric or non-caloric (for example, water) control conditions. Overall, the balance of evidence indicates that use of LES in place of sugar, in children and adults, leads to reduced EI and BW, and possibly also when compared with water. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4786736 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47867362016-03-16 Does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? A systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies Rogers, P J Hogenkamp, P S de Graaf, C Higgs, S Lluch, A Ness, A R Penfold, C Perry, R Putz, P Yeomans, M R Mela, D J Int J Obes (Lond) Review By reducing energy density, low-energy sweeteners (LES) might be expected to reduce energy intake (EI) and body weight (BW). To assess the totality of the evidence testing the null hypothesis that LES exposure (versus sugars or unsweetened alternatives) has no effect on EI or BW, we conducted a systematic review of relevant studies in animals and humans consuming LES with ad libitum access to food energy. In 62 of 90 animal studies exposure to LES did not affect or decreased BW. Of 28 reporting increased BW, 19 compared LES with glucose exposure using a specific ‘learning' paradigm. Twelve prospective cohort studies in humans reported inconsistent associations between LES use and body mass index (−0.002 kg m(−)(2) per year, 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.009 to 0.005). Meta-analysis of short-term randomized controlled trials (129 comparisons) showed reduced total EI for LES versus sugar-sweetened food or beverage consumption before an ad libitum meal (−94 kcal, 95% CI −122 to −66), with no difference versus water (−2 kcal, 95% CI −30 to 26). This was consistent with EI results from sustained intervention randomized controlled trials (10 comparisons). Meta-analysis of sustained intervention randomized controlled trials (4 weeks to 40 months) showed that consumption of LES versus sugar led to relatively reduced BW (nine comparisons; −1.35 kg, 95% CI –2.28 to −0.42), and a similar relative reduction in BW versus water (three comparisons; −1.24 kg, 95% CI –2.22 to −0.26). Most animal studies did not mimic LES consumption by humans, and reverse causation may influence the results of prospective cohort studies. The preponderance of evidence from all human randomized controlled trials indicates that LES do not increase EI or BW, whether compared with caloric or non-caloric (for example, water) control conditions. Overall, the balance of evidence indicates that use of LES in place of sugar, in children and adults, leads to reduced EI and BW, and possibly also when compared with water. Nature Publishing Group 2016-03 2015-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4786736/ /pubmed/26365102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2015.177 Text en Copyright © 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article#amp;#x02019;s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Review Rogers, P J Hogenkamp, P S de Graaf, C Higgs, S Lluch, A Ness, A R Penfold, C Perry, R Putz, P Yeomans, M R Mela, D J Does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? A systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies |
title | Does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? A systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies |
title_full | Does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? A systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies |
title_fullStr | Does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? A systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? A systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies |
title_short | Does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? A systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies |
title_sort | does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? a systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4786736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26365102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2015.177 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rogerspj doeslowenergysweetenerconsumptionaffectenergyintakeandbodyweightasystematicreviewincludingmetaanalysesoftheevidencefromhumanandanimalstudies AT hogenkampps doeslowenergysweetenerconsumptionaffectenergyintakeandbodyweightasystematicreviewincludingmetaanalysesoftheevidencefromhumanandanimalstudies AT degraafc doeslowenergysweetenerconsumptionaffectenergyintakeandbodyweightasystematicreviewincludingmetaanalysesoftheevidencefromhumanandanimalstudies AT higgss doeslowenergysweetenerconsumptionaffectenergyintakeandbodyweightasystematicreviewincludingmetaanalysesoftheevidencefromhumanandanimalstudies AT llucha doeslowenergysweetenerconsumptionaffectenergyintakeandbodyweightasystematicreviewincludingmetaanalysesoftheevidencefromhumanandanimalstudies AT nessar doeslowenergysweetenerconsumptionaffectenergyintakeandbodyweightasystematicreviewincludingmetaanalysesoftheevidencefromhumanandanimalstudies AT penfoldc doeslowenergysweetenerconsumptionaffectenergyintakeandbodyweightasystematicreviewincludingmetaanalysesoftheevidencefromhumanandanimalstudies AT perryr doeslowenergysweetenerconsumptionaffectenergyintakeandbodyweightasystematicreviewincludingmetaanalysesoftheevidencefromhumanandanimalstudies AT putzp doeslowenergysweetenerconsumptionaffectenergyintakeandbodyweightasystematicreviewincludingmetaanalysesoftheevidencefromhumanandanimalstudies AT yeomansmr doeslowenergysweetenerconsumptionaffectenergyintakeandbodyweightasystematicreviewincludingmetaanalysesoftheevidencefromhumanandanimalstudies AT meladj doeslowenergysweetenerconsumptionaffectenergyintakeandbodyweightasystematicreviewincludingmetaanalysesoftheevidencefromhumanandanimalstudies |