Cargando…
A comparison of the recoverable proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from two different types of papers
Aim: Paper is used for various purposes in hospitals. Generally, there are two different types of paper, which are commonly used in our facility: wood-free paper, and paper containing wood. We compared the recoverable proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA; ATCC 43300) from...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4786743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26985400 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000266 |
_version_ | 1782420591679111168 |
---|---|
author | Kacmaz, Birgul Gul, Serdar |
author_facet | Kacmaz, Birgul Gul, Serdar |
author_sort | Kacmaz, Birgul |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aim: Paper is used for various purposes in hospitals. Generally, there are two different types of paper, which are commonly used in our facility: wood-free paper, and paper containing wood. We compared the recoverable proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA; ATCC 43300) from the surface of such papers. Method: The papers were divided into two groups: Group 1: wood-free paper; Group 2: paper containing wood. The papers were contaminated in a standardized procedure with 0.1 mL of a 5×10(7) CFU MRSA/mL stock solution. Results: The recoverable proportion of MRSA was higher in the wood-containing papers than in the papers without wood (P=0.043). Conclusion: This study indicates that if paper is purchased for healthcare facilities it should not contain wood, but rather wood-free paper types should be considered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4786743 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | German Medical Science GMS Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47867432016-03-16 A comparison of the recoverable proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from two different types of papers Kacmaz, Birgul Gul, Serdar GMS Hyg Infect Control Article Aim: Paper is used for various purposes in hospitals. Generally, there are two different types of paper, which are commonly used in our facility: wood-free paper, and paper containing wood. We compared the recoverable proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA; ATCC 43300) from the surface of such papers. Method: The papers were divided into two groups: Group 1: wood-free paper; Group 2: paper containing wood. The papers were contaminated in a standardized procedure with 0.1 mL of a 5×10(7) CFU MRSA/mL stock solution. Results: The recoverable proportion of MRSA was higher in the wood-containing papers than in the papers without wood (P=0.043). Conclusion: This study indicates that if paper is purchased for healthcare facilities it should not contain wood, but rather wood-free paper types should be considered. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2016-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4786743/ /pubmed/26985400 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000266 Text en Copyright © 2016 Kacmaz et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. |
spellingShingle | Article Kacmaz, Birgul Gul, Serdar A comparison of the recoverable proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from two different types of papers |
title | A comparison of the recoverable proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from two different types of papers |
title_full | A comparison of the recoverable proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from two different types of papers |
title_fullStr | A comparison of the recoverable proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from two different types of papers |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of the recoverable proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from two different types of papers |
title_short | A comparison of the recoverable proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from two different types of papers |
title_sort | comparison of the recoverable proportion of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus from two different types of papers |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4786743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26985400 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000266 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kacmazbirgul acomparisonoftherecoverableproportionofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusfromtwodifferenttypesofpapers AT gulserdar acomparisonoftherecoverableproportionofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusfromtwodifferenttypesofpapers AT kacmazbirgul comparisonoftherecoverableproportionofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusfromtwodifferenttypesofpapers AT gulserdar comparisonoftherecoverableproportionofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusfromtwodifferenttypesofpapers |