Cargando…

A comparison of the recoverable proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from two different types of papers

Aim: Paper is used for various purposes in hospitals. Generally, there are two different types of paper, which are commonly used in our facility: wood-free paper, and paper containing wood. We compared the recoverable proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA; ATCC 43300) from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kacmaz, Birgul, Gul, Serdar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4786743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26985400
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000266
_version_ 1782420591679111168
author Kacmaz, Birgul
Gul, Serdar
author_facet Kacmaz, Birgul
Gul, Serdar
author_sort Kacmaz, Birgul
collection PubMed
description Aim: Paper is used for various purposes in hospitals. Generally, there are two different types of paper, which are commonly used in our facility: wood-free paper, and paper containing wood. We compared the recoverable proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA; ATCC 43300) from the surface of such papers. Method: The papers were divided into two groups: Group 1: wood-free paper; Group 2: paper containing wood. The papers were contaminated in a standardized procedure with 0.1 mL of a 5×10(7) CFU MRSA/mL stock solution. Results: The recoverable proportion of MRSA was higher in the wood-containing papers than in the papers without wood (P=0.043). Conclusion: This study indicates that if paper is purchased for healthcare facilities it should not contain wood, but rather wood-free paper types should be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4786743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47867432016-03-16 A comparison of the recoverable proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from two different types of papers Kacmaz, Birgul Gul, Serdar GMS Hyg Infect Control Article Aim: Paper is used for various purposes in hospitals. Generally, there are two different types of paper, which are commonly used in our facility: wood-free paper, and paper containing wood. We compared the recoverable proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA; ATCC 43300) from the surface of such papers. Method: The papers were divided into two groups: Group 1: wood-free paper; Group 2: paper containing wood. The papers were contaminated in a standardized procedure with 0.1 mL of a 5×10(7) CFU MRSA/mL stock solution. Results: The recoverable proportion of MRSA was higher in the wood-containing papers than in the papers without wood (P=0.043). Conclusion: This study indicates that if paper is purchased for healthcare facilities it should not contain wood, but rather wood-free paper types should be considered. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2016-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4786743/ /pubmed/26985400 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000266 Text en Copyright © 2016 Kacmaz et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
spellingShingle Article
Kacmaz, Birgul
Gul, Serdar
A comparison of the recoverable proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from two different types of papers
title A comparison of the recoverable proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from two different types of papers
title_full A comparison of the recoverable proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from two different types of papers
title_fullStr A comparison of the recoverable proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from two different types of papers
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of the recoverable proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from two different types of papers
title_short A comparison of the recoverable proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from two different types of papers
title_sort comparison of the recoverable proportion of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus from two different types of papers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4786743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26985400
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000266
work_keys_str_mv AT kacmazbirgul acomparisonoftherecoverableproportionofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusfromtwodifferenttypesofpapers
AT gulserdar acomparisonoftherecoverableproportionofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusfromtwodifferenttypesofpapers
AT kacmazbirgul comparisonoftherecoverableproportionofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusfromtwodifferenttypesofpapers
AT gulserdar comparisonoftherecoverableproportionofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusfromtwodifferenttypesofpapers