Cargando…

Variations in Early Response of Grapevine Wood Depending on Wound and Inoculation Combinations with Phaeoacremonium aleophilum and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora

Defense mechanisms in woody tissue are poorly understood, especially in vine colonized by trunk pathogens. However, several investigations suggest that molecular mechanisms in the central tissue of Vitis vinifera L. may be involved in trunk-defense reactions. In this work, the perception of Phaeoacr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pierron, Romain J. G., Pouzoulet, Jérôme, Couderc, Christel, Judic, Elodie, Compant, Stéphane, Jacques, Alban
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4786745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27014294
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00268
_version_ 1782420591901409280
author Pierron, Romain J. G.
Pouzoulet, Jérôme
Couderc, Christel
Judic, Elodie
Compant, Stéphane
Jacques, Alban
author_facet Pierron, Romain J. G.
Pouzoulet, Jérôme
Couderc, Christel
Judic, Elodie
Compant, Stéphane
Jacques, Alban
author_sort Pierron, Romain J. G.
collection PubMed
description Defense mechanisms in woody tissue are poorly understood, especially in vine colonized by trunk pathogens. However, several investigations suggest that molecular mechanisms in the central tissue of Vitis vinifera L. may be involved in trunk-defense reactions. In this work, the perception of Phaeoacremonium aleophilum and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora alone or together were investigated in cuttings of Cabernet Sauvignon trunks. Plant responses were analyzed at the tissue level via optical microscopy and at the cellular level via plant-gene expression. The microscopy results revealed that, 6 weeks after pathogen inoculation, newly formed vascular tissue is less developed in plants inoculated with P. chlamydospora than in plants inoculated with P. aleophilum. Co-inoculation with both pathogens resulted in an intermediate phenotype. Further analysis showed the relative expression of the following grapevine genes: PAL, PR10.3, TL, TLb, Vv17.3, STS, STS8, CWinv, PIN, CAM, LOX at 10, 24, 48, and 120 h post-inoculation (hpi). The gene set was induced by wounding before inoculation with the different pathogens, except for the genes CAM and LOX. This response generated significant noise, but the expression of the grapevine genes (PAL, PR10.3, TL, TLb, Vv17.3, STS, STS8, CWinv, and PIN) still differed due to perception of mycelium by the plant. Furthermore, at 48 hpi, the induction of PAL and STS8 differs depending on the pathogen, and a specific pattern emerges from the different inductions associated with the different treatments. Based on these results, we conclude that V. vinifera L. trunk perceives the presence of pathogens differently depending on the inoculated pathogen or even on the combination of co-inoculated pathogens, suggesting a defense orchestration in the perennial organs of woody plants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4786745
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47867452016-03-24 Variations in Early Response of Grapevine Wood Depending on Wound and Inoculation Combinations with Phaeoacremonium aleophilum and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora Pierron, Romain J. G. Pouzoulet, Jérôme Couderc, Christel Judic, Elodie Compant, Stéphane Jacques, Alban Front Plant Sci Plant Science Defense mechanisms in woody tissue are poorly understood, especially in vine colonized by trunk pathogens. However, several investigations suggest that molecular mechanisms in the central tissue of Vitis vinifera L. may be involved in trunk-defense reactions. In this work, the perception of Phaeoacremonium aleophilum and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora alone or together were investigated in cuttings of Cabernet Sauvignon trunks. Plant responses were analyzed at the tissue level via optical microscopy and at the cellular level via plant-gene expression. The microscopy results revealed that, 6 weeks after pathogen inoculation, newly formed vascular tissue is less developed in plants inoculated with P. chlamydospora than in plants inoculated with P. aleophilum. Co-inoculation with both pathogens resulted in an intermediate phenotype. Further analysis showed the relative expression of the following grapevine genes: PAL, PR10.3, TL, TLb, Vv17.3, STS, STS8, CWinv, PIN, CAM, LOX at 10, 24, 48, and 120 h post-inoculation (hpi). The gene set was induced by wounding before inoculation with the different pathogens, except for the genes CAM and LOX. This response generated significant noise, but the expression of the grapevine genes (PAL, PR10.3, TL, TLb, Vv17.3, STS, STS8, CWinv, and PIN) still differed due to perception of mycelium by the plant. Furthermore, at 48 hpi, the induction of PAL and STS8 differs depending on the pathogen, and a specific pattern emerges from the different inductions associated with the different treatments. Based on these results, we conclude that V. vinifera L. trunk perceives the presence of pathogens differently depending on the inoculated pathogen or even on the combination of co-inoculated pathogens, suggesting a defense orchestration in the perennial organs of woody plants. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4786745/ /pubmed/27014294 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00268 Text en Copyright © 2016 Pierron, Pouzoulet, Couderc, Judic, Compant and Jacques. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Pierron, Romain J. G.
Pouzoulet, Jérôme
Couderc, Christel
Judic, Elodie
Compant, Stéphane
Jacques, Alban
Variations in Early Response of Grapevine Wood Depending on Wound and Inoculation Combinations with Phaeoacremonium aleophilum and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora
title Variations in Early Response of Grapevine Wood Depending on Wound and Inoculation Combinations with Phaeoacremonium aleophilum and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora
title_full Variations in Early Response of Grapevine Wood Depending on Wound and Inoculation Combinations with Phaeoacremonium aleophilum and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora
title_fullStr Variations in Early Response of Grapevine Wood Depending on Wound and Inoculation Combinations with Phaeoacremonium aleophilum and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora
title_full_unstemmed Variations in Early Response of Grapevine Wood Depending on Wound and Inoculation Combinations with Phaeoacremonium aleophilum and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora
title_short Variations in Early Response of Grapevine Wood Depending on Wound and Inoculation Combinations with Phaeoacremonium aleophilum and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora
title_sort variations in early response of grapevine wood depending on wound and inoculation combinations with phaeoacremonium aleophilum and phaeomoniella chlamydospora
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4786745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27014294
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00268
work_keys_str_mv AT pierronromainjg variationsinearlyresponseofgrapevinewooddependingonwoundandinoculationcombinationswithphaeoacremoniumaleophilumandphaeomoniellachlamydospora
AT pouzouletjerome variationsinearlyresponseofgrapevinewooddependingonwoundandinoculationcombinationswithphaeoacremoniumaleophilumandphaeomoniellachlamydospora
AT coudercchristel variationsinearlyresponseofgrapevinewooddependingonwoundandinoculationcombinationswithphaeoacremoniumaleophilumandphaeomoniellachlamydospora
AT judicelodie variationsinearlyresponseofgrapevinewooddependingonwoundandinoculationcombinationswithphaeoacremoniumaleophilumandphaeomoniellachlamydospora
AT compantstephane variationsinearlyresponseofgrapevinewooddependingonwoundandinoculationcombinationswithphaeoacremoniumaleophilumandphaeomoniellachlamydospora
AT jacquesalban variationsinearlyresponseofgrapevinewooddependingonwoundandinoculationcombinationswithphaeoacremoniumaleophilumandphaeomoniellachlamydospora