Cargando…
Comparison of Accuracy in Calculation of Absorbed Dose to Patients Following Bone Scan with (99m)Tc-Marked Diphosphonates by Two Different Background Correction Methods
To improve the accuracy of the activity quantification and the image quality in scintigraphy, scatter correction is a vital procedure. The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy in calculation of absorbed dose to patients following bone scan with (99m)Tc-marked diphosphonates ((99m)Tc-MDP) by...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4786961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27014610 |
_version_ | 1782420629244346368 |
---|---|
author | Shahbazi-Gahrouei, Daryoush Damoori, Mehri Tavakoli, Mohammad Bagher Moslehi, Masoud |
author_facet | Shahbazi-Gahrouei, Daryoush Damoori, Mehri Tavakoli, Mohammad Bagher Moslehi, Masoud |
author_sort | Shahbazi-Gahrouei, Daryoush |
collection | PubMed |
description | To improve the accuracy of the activity quantification and the image quality in scintigraphy, scatter correction is a vital procedure. The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy in calculation of absorbed dose to patients following bone scan with (99m)Tc-marked diphosphonates ((99m)Tc-MDP) by two different methods of background correction in conjugate view method. This study involved 22 patients referring to the Nuclear Medicine Center of Shahid Chamran Hospital, Isfahan, Iran. After the injection of (99m)Tc-MDP, whole-body images from patients were acquired at 10, 60, 90, and 180 min. Organ activities were calculated using the conjugate view method by Buijs and conventional background correction. Finally, the absorbed dose was calculated using the Medical Internal Radiation Dosimetry (MIRD) technique. The results of this study showed that the absorbed dose per unit of injected activity (rad/mCi) ± standard deviation for pelvis bone, bladder, and kidneys by Buijs method was 0.19 ± 0.05, 0.08 ± 0.01, and 0.03 ± 0.01 and by conventional method was 0.13 ± 0.04, 0.08 ± 0.01, and 0.024 ± 0.01, respectively. This showed that Buijs background correction method had a high accuracy compared to conventional method for the estimated absorbed dose of bone and kidneys whereas, for the bladder, its accuracy was low. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4786961 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47869612016-03-24 Comparison of Accuracy in Calculation of Absorbed Dose to Patients Following Bone Scan with (99m)Tc-Marked Diphosphonates by Two Different Background Correction Methods Shahbazi-Gahrouei, Daryoush Damoori, Mehri Tavakoli, Mohammad Bagher Moslehi, Masoud J Med Signals Sens Original Article To improve the accuracy of the activity quantification and the image quality in scintigraphy, scatter correction is a vital procedure. The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy in calculation of absorbed dose to patients following bone scan with (99m)Tc-marked diphosphonates ((99m)Tc-MDP) by two different methods of background correction in conjugate view method. This study involved 22 patients referring to the Nuclear Medicine Center of Shahid Chamran Hospital, Isfahan, Iran. After the injection of (99m)Tc-MDP, whole-body images from patients were acquired at 10, 60, 90, and 180 min. Organ activities were calculated using the conjugate view method by Buijs and conventional background correction. Finally, the absorbed dose was calculated using the Medical Internal Radiation Dosimetry (MIRD) technique. The results of this study showed that the absorbed dose per unit of injected activity (rad/mCi) ± standard deviation for pelvis bone, bladder, and kidneys by Buijs method was 0.19 ± 0.05, 0.08 ± 0.01, and 0.03 ± 0.01 and by conventional method was 0.13 ± 0.04, 0.08 ± 0.01, and 0.024 ± 0.01, respectively. This showed that Buijs background correction method had a high accuracy compared to conventional method for the estimated absorbed dose of bone and kidneys whereas, for the bladder, its accuracy was low. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4786961/ /pubmed/27014610 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Journal of Medical Signals & Sensors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Shahbazi-Gahrouei, Daryoush Damoori, Mehri Tavakoli, Mohammad Bagher Moslehi, Masoud Comparison of Accuracy in Calculation of Absorbed Dose to Patients Following Bone Scan with (99m)Tc-Marked Diphosphonates by Two Different Background Correction Methods |
title | Comparison of Accuracy in Calculation of Absorbed Dose to Patients Following Bone Scan with (99m)Tc-Marked Diphosphonates by Two Different Background Correction Methods |
title_full | Comparison of Accuracy in Calculation of Absorbed Dose to Patients Following Bone Scan with (99m)Tc-Marked Diphosphonates by Two Different Background Correction Methods |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Accuracy in Calculation of Absorbed Dose to Patients Following Bone Scan with (99m)Tc-Marked Diphosphonates by Two Different Background Correction Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Accuracy in Calculation of Absorbed Dose to Patients Following Bone Scan with (99m)Tc-Marked Diphosphonates by Two Different Background Correction Methods |
title_short | Comparison of Accuracy in Calculation of Absorbed Dose to Patients Following Bone Scan with (99m)Tc-Marked Diphosphonates by Two Different Background Correction Methods |
title_sort | comparison of accuracy in calculation of absorbed dose to patients following bone scan with (99m)tc-marked diphosphonates by two different background correction methods |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4786961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27014610 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shahbazigahroueidaryoush comparisonofaccuracyincalculationofabsorbeddosetopatientsfollowingbonescanwith99mtcmarkeddiphosphonatesbytwodifferentbackgroundcorrectionmethods AT damoorimehri comparisonofaccuracyincalculationofabsorbeddosetopatientsfollowingbonescanwith99mtcmarkeddiphosphonatesbytwodifferentbackgroundcorrectionmethods AT tavakolimohammadbagher comparisonofaccuracyincalculationofabsorbeddosetopatientsfollowingbonescanwith99mtcmarkeddiphosphonatesbytwodifferentbackgroundcorrectionmethods AT moslehimasoud comparisonofaccuracyincalculationofabsorbeddosetopatientsfollowingbonescanwith99mtcmarkeddiphosphonatesbytwodifferentbackgroundcorrectionmethods |