Cargando…

Femtosecond lasers for laser in situ keratomileusis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to review and meta-analyze whether there are differences between reported femtosecond (FS) lasers for laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in terms of efficacy, predictability, and safety as primary outcomes and corneal flap thickness measurements and pre-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huhtala, Anne, Pietilä, Juhani, Mäkinen, Petri, Uusitalo, Hannu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4788361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27022236
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S99394
_version_ 1782420718169882624
author Huhtala, Anne
Pietilä, Juhani
Mäkinen, Petri
Uusitalo, Hannu
author_facet Huhtala, Anne
Pietilä, Juhani
Mäkinen, Petri
Uusitalo, Hannu
author_sort Huhtala, Anne
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to review and meta-analyze whether there are differences between reported femtosecond (FS) lasers for laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in terms of efficacy, predictability, and safety as primary outcomes and corneal flap thickness measurements and pre- and postoperative complications as secondary outcomes. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL Trials Library databases was conducted to identify the relevant prospective randomized controlled trials of FS lasers for LASIK. Thirty-one articles describing a total of 5,404 eyes were included. RESULTS: Based on efficacy, IntraLase FS 10 and 30 kHz gave the best results. Based on predictability and safety, there were no differences between various FS lasers. FEMTO LDV and IntraLase FS 60 kHz produced the most accurate flap thicknesses. IntraLase and Wavelight SF200 had the fewest intraoperative complications. IntraLase, Visumax, and Wavelight FS200 had the most seldom postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: There were dissimilarities between different FS lasers based on efficacy and intraoperative and postoperative complications. All FS lasers were predictable and safe for making corneal flaps in LASIK.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4788361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47883612016-03-28 Femtosecond lasers for laser in situ keratomileusis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Huhtala, Anne Pietilä, Juhani Mäkinen, Petri Uusitalo, Hannu Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to review and meta-analyze whether there are differences between reported femtosecond (FS) lasers for laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in terms of efficacy, predictability, and safety as primary outcomes and corneal flap thickness measurements and pre- and postoperative complications as secondary outcomes. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL Trials Library databases was conducted to identify the relevant prospective randomized controlled trials of FS lasers for LASIK. Thirty-one articles describing a total of 5,404 eyes were included. RESULTS: Based on efficacy, IntraLase FS 10 and 30 kHz gave the best results. Based on predictability and safety, there were no differences between various FS lasers. FEMTO LDV and IntraLase FS 60 kHz produced the most accurate flap thicknesses. IntraLase and Wavelight SF200 had the fewest intraoperative complications. IntraLase, Visumax, and Wavelight FS200 had the most seldom postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: There were dissimilarities between different FS lasers based on efficacy and intraoperative and postoperative complications. All FS lasers were predictable and safe for making corneal flaps in LASIK. Dove Medical Press 2016-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4788361/ /pubmed/27022236 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S99394 Text en © 2016 Huhtala et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Huhtala, Anne
Pietilä, Juhani
Mäkinen, Petri
Uusitalo, Hannu
Femtosecond lasers for laser in situ keratomileusis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Femtosecond lasers for laser in situ keratomileusis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Femtosecond lasers for laser in situ keratomileusis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Femtosecond lasers for laser in situ keratomileusis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Femtosecond lasers for laser in situ keratomileusis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Femtosecond lasers for laser in situ keratomileusis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort femtosecond lasers for laser in situ keratomileusis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4788361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27022236
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S99394
work_keys_str_mv AT huhtalaanne femtosecondlasersforlaserinsitukeratomileusisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pietilajuhani femtosecondlasersforlaserinsitukeratomileusisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT makinenpetri femtosecondlasersforlaserinsitukeratomileusisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT uusitalohannu femtosecondlasersforlaserinsitukeratomileusisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis