Cargando…

Intima-Media Thickness Does Not Differ between Two Common Carotid Artery Segments in Children

Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) is a surrogate marker of early atherosclerotic changes in children. cIMT-studies are hard to compare, due to variations in ultrasound protocols, especially regarding the common carotid artery (CCA) segment measured in relation to the bulb. This study’s purpose w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weberruß, Heidi, Pirzer, Raphael, Dalla Pozza, Robert, Netz, Heinrich, Oberhoffer, Renate
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4788416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26968038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149057
_version_ 1782420726897180672
author Weberruß, Heidi
Pirzer, Raphael
Dalla Pozza, Robert
Netz, Heinrich
Oberhoffer, Renate
author_facet Weberruß, Heidi
Pirzer, Raphael
Dalla Pozza, Robert
Netz, Heinrich
Oberhoffer, Renate
author_sort Weberruß, Heidi
collection PubMed
description Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) is a surrogate marker of early atherosclerotic changes in children. cIMT-studies are hard to compare, due to variations in ultrasound protocols, especially regarding the common carotid artery (CCA) segment measured in relation to the bulb. This study’s purpose was therefore to compare two distinct CCA segments in children, to see if cIMT values differ substantially according to the site of measurement. cIMT was assessed after power calculation in 30 children (15 girls) aged 8–17, using B-Mode ultrasound (5–13 MHz) at two CCA locations. The first measurement was performed over a distance of 1 cm immediately after the bulb (A), the second 1cm proximal the bulb (B) over the same distance of 1cm length. Means of end-diastolic far wall cIMT were compared between measurement A and B. cIMT in 30 participants was 0.51±0.06 mm for measurement A and 0.51±0.05 mm for measurement B. Results did not differ significantly (p = .947) over a distance of 2 cm after the bulb. According to our results, studies measuring CCA IMT within the first 2 cm, either close to the bulb or further proximal, can be compared. This will improve interpretation of data and application of reference values.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4788416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47884162016-03-23 Intima-Media Thickness Does Not Differ between Two Common Carotid Artery Segments in Children Weberruß, Heidi Pirzer, Raphael Dalla Pozza, Robert Netz, Heinrich Oberhoffer, Renate PLoS One Research Article Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) is a surrogate marker of early atherosclerotic changes in children. cIMT-studies are hard to compare, due to variations in ultrasound protocols, especially regarding the common carotid artery (CCA) segment measured in relation to the bulb. This study’s purpose was therefore to compare two distinct CCA segments in children, to see if cIMT values differ substantially according to the site of measurement. cIMT was assessed after power calculation in 30 children (15 girls) aged 8–17, using B-Mode ultrasound (5–13 MHz) at two CCA locations. The first measurement was performed over a distance of 1 cm immediately after the bulb (A), the second 1cm proximal the bulb (B) over the same distance of 1cm length. Means of end-diastolic far wall cIMT were compared between measurement A and B. cIMT in 30 participants was 0.51±0.06 mm for measurement A and 0.51±0.05 mm for measurement B. Results did not differ significantly (p = .947) over a distance of 2 cm after the bulb. According to our results, studies measuring CCA IMT within the first 2 cm, either close to the bulb or further proximal, can be compared. This will improve interpretation of data and application of reference values. Public Library of Science 2016-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4788416/ /pubmed/26968038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149057 Text en © 2016 Weberruß et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Weberruß, Heidi
Pirzer, Raphael
Dalla Pozza, Robert
Netz, Heinrich
Oberhoffer, Renate
Intima-Media Thickness Does Not Differ between Two Common Carotid Artery Segments in Children
title Intima-Media Thickness Does Not Differ between Two Common Carotid Artery Segments in Children
title_full Intima-Media Thickness Does Not Differ between Two Common Carotid Artery Segments in Children
title_fullStr Intima-Media Thickness Does Not Differ between Two Common Carotid Artery Segments in Children
title_full_unstemmed Intima-Media Thickness Does Not Differ between Two Common Carotid Artery Segments in Children
title_short Intima-Media Thickness Does Not Differ between Two Common Carotid Artery Segments in Children
title_sort intima-media thickness does not differ between two common carotid artery segments in children
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4788416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26968038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149057
work_keys_str_mv AT weberrußheidi intimamediathicknessdoesnotdifferbetweentwocommoncarotidarterysegmentsinchildren
AT pirzerraphael intimamediathicknessdoesnotdifferbetweentwocommoncarotidarterysegmentsinchildren
AT dallapozzarobert intimamediathicknessdoesnotdifferbetweentwocommoncarotidarterysegmentsinchildren
AT netzheinrich intimamediathicknessdoesnotdifferbetweentwocommoncarotidarterysegmentsinchildren
AT oberhofferrenate intimamediathicknessdoesnotdifferbetweentwocommoncarotidarterysegmentsinchildren