Cargando…
Intima-Media Thickness Does Not Differ between Two Common Carotid Artery Segments in Children
Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) is a surrogate marker of early atherosclerotic changes in children. cIMT-studies are hard to compare, due to variations in ultrasound protocols, especially regarding the common carotid artery (CCA) segment measured in relation to the bulb. This study’s purpose w...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4788416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26968038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149057 |
_version_ | 1782420726897180672 |
---|---|
author | Weberruß, Heidi Pirzer, Raphael Dalla Pozza, Robert Netz, Heinrich Oberhoffer, Renate |
author_facet | Weberruß, Heidi Pirzer, Raphael Dalla Pozza, Robert Netz, Heinrich Oberhoffer, Renate |
author_sort | Weberruß, Heidi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) is a surrogate marker of early atherosclerotic changes in children. cIMT-studies are hard to compare, due to variations in ultrasound protocols, especially regarding the common carotid artery (CCA) segment measured in relation to the bulb. This study’s purpose was therefore to compare two distinct CCA segments in children, to see if cIMT values differ substantially according to the site of measurement. cIMT was assessed after power calculation in 30 children (15 girls) aged 8–17, using B-Mode ultrasound (5–13 MHz) at two CCA locations. The first measurement was performed over a distance of 1 cm immediately after the bulb (A), the second 1cm proximal the bulb (B) over the same distance of 1cm length. Means of end-diastolic far wall cIMT were compared between measurement A and B. cIMT in 30 participants was 0.51±0.06 mm for measurement A and 0.51±0.05 mm for measurement B. Results did not differ significantly (p = .947) over a distance of 2 cm after the bulb. According to our results, studies measuring CCA IMT within the first 2 cm, either close to the bulb or further proximal, can be compared. This will improve interpretation of data and application of reference values. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4788416 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47884162016-03-23 Intima-Media Thickness Does Not Differ between Two Common Carotid Artery Segments in Children Weberruß, Heidi Pirzer, Raphael Dalla Pozza, Robert Netz, Heinrich Oberhoffer, Renate PLoS One Research Article Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) is a surrogate marker of early atherosclerotic changes in children. cIMT-studies are hard to compare, due to variations in ultrasound protocols, especially regarding the common carotid artery (CCA) segment measured in relation to the bulb. This study’s purpose was therefore to compare two distinct CCA segments in children, to see if cIMT values differ substantially according to the site of measurement. cIMT was assessed after power calculation in 30 children (15 girls) aged 8–17, using B-Mode ultrasound (5–13 MHz) at two CCA locations. The first measurement was performed over a distance of 1 cm immediately after the bulb (A), the second 1cm proximal the bulb (B) over the same distance of 1cm length. Means of end-diastolic far wall cIMT were compared between measurement A and B. cIMT in 30 participants was 0.51±0.06 mm for measurement A and 0.51±0.05 mm for measurement B. Results did not differ significantly (p = .947) over a distance of 2 cm after the bulb. According to our results, studies measuring CCA IMT within the first 2 cm, either close to the bulb or further proximal, can be compared. This will improve interpretation of data and application of reference values. Public Library of Science 2016-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4788416/ /pubmed/26968038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149057 Text en © 2016 Weberruß et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Weberruß, Heidi Pirzer, Raphael Dalla Pozza, Robert Netz, Heinrich Oberhoffer, Renate Intima-Media Thickness Does Not Differ between Two Common Carotid Artery Segments in Children |
title | Intima-Media Thickness Does Not Differ between Two Common Carotid Artery Segments in Children |
title_full | Intima-Media Thickness Does Not Differ between Two Common Carotid Artery Segments in Children |
title_fullStr | Intima-Media Thickness Does Not Differ between Two Common Carotid Artery Segments in Children |
title_full_unstemmed | Intima-Media Thickness Does Not Differ between Two Common Carotid Artery Segments in Children |
title_short | Intima-Media Thickness Does Not Differ between Two Common Carotid Artery Segments in Children |
title_sort | intima-media thickness does not differ between two common carotid artery segments in children |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4788416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26968038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149057 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weberrußheidi intimamediathicknessdoesnotdifferbetweentwocommoncarotidarterysegmentsinchildren AT pirzerraphael intimamediathicknessdoesnotdifferbetweentwocommoncarotidarterysegmentsinchildren AT dallapozzarobert intimamediathicknessdoesnotdifferbetweentwocommoncarotidarterysegmentsinchildren AT netzheinrich intimamediathicknessdoesnotdifferbetweentwocommoncarotidarterysegmentsinchildren AT oberhofferrenate intimamediathicknessdoesnotdifferbetweentwocommoncarotidarterysegmentsinchildren |