Cargando…

“Anyone Know What Species This Is?” – Twitter Conversations as Embryonic Citizen Science Communities

Social media like blogs, micro-blogs or social networks are increasingly being investigated and employed to detect and predict trends for not only social and physical phenomena, but also to capture environmental information. Here we argue that opportunistic biodiversity observations published throug...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daume, Stefan, Galaz, Victor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4788454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26967526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151387
_version_ 1782420735688441856
author Daume, Stefan
Galaz, Victor
author_facet Daume, Stefan
Galaz, Victor
author_sort Daume, Stefan
collection PubMed
description Social media like blogs, micro-blogs or social networks are increasingly being investigated and employed to detect and predict trends for not only social and physical phenomena, but also to capture environmental information. Here we argue that opportunistic biodiversity observations published through Twitter represent one promising and until now unexplored example of such data mining. As we elaborate, it can contribute to real-time information to traditional ecological monitoring programmes including those sourced via citizen science activities. Using Twitter data collected for a generic assessment of social media data in ecological monitoring we investigated a sample of what we denote biodiversity observations with species determination requests (N = 191). These entail images posted as messages on the micro-blog service Twitter. As we show, these frequently trigger conversations leading to taxonomic determinations of those observations. All analysed Tweets were posted with species determination requests, which generated replies for 64% of Tweets, 86% of those contained at least one suggested determination, of which 76% were assessed as correct. All posted observations included or linked to images with the overall image quality categorised as satisfactory or better for 81% of the sample and leading to taxonomic determinations at the species level in 71% of provided determinations. We claim that the original message authors and conversation participants can be viewed as implicit or embryonic citizen science communities which have to offer valuable contributions both as an opportunistic data source in ecological monitoring as well as potential active contributors to citizen science programmes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4788454
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47884542016-03-23 “Anyone Know What Species This Is?” – Twitter Conversations as Embryonic Citizen Science Communities Daume, Stefan Galaz, Victor PLoS One Research Article Social media like blogs, micro-blogs or social networks are increasingly being investigated and employed to detect and predict trends for not only social and physical phenomena, but also to capture environmental information. Here we argue that opportunistic biodiversity observations published through Twitter represent one promising and until now unexplored example of such data mining. As we elaborate, it can contribute to real-time information to traditional ecological monitoring programmes including those sourced via citizen science activities. Using Twitter data collected for a generic assessment of social media data in ecological monitoring we investigated a sample of what we denote biodiversity observations with species determination requests (N = 191). These entail images posted as messages on the micro-blog service Twitter. As we show, these frequently trigger conversations leading to taxonomic determinations of those observations. All analysed Tweets were posted with species determination requests, which generated replies for 64% of Tweets, 86% of those contained at least one suggested determination, of which 76% were assessed as correct. All posted observations included or linked to images with the overall image quality categorised as satisfactory or better for 81% of the sample and leading to taxonomic determinations at the species level in 71% of provided determinations. We claim that the original message authors and conversation participants can be viewed as implicit or embryonic citizen science communities which have to offer valuable contributions both as an opportunistic data source in ecological monitoring as well as potential active contributors to citizen science programmes. Public Library of Science 2016-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4788454/ /pubmed/26967526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151387 Text en © 2016 Daume, Galaz http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Daume, Stefan
Galaz, Victor
“Anyone Know What Species This Is?” – Twitter Conversations as Embryonic Citizen Science Communities
title “Anyone Know What Species This Is?” – Twitter Conversations as Embryonic Citizen Science Communities
title_full “Anyone Know What Species This Is?” – Twitter Conversations as Embryonic Citizen Science Communities
title_fullStr “Anyone Know What Species This Is?” – Twitter Conversations as Embryonic Citizen Science Communities
title_full_unstemmed “Anyone Know What Species This Is?” – Twitter Conversations as Embryonic Citizen Science Communities
title_short “Anyone Know What Species This Is?” – Twitter Conversations as Embryonic Citizen Science Communities
title_sort “anyone know what species this is?” – twitter conversations as embryonic citizen science communities
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4788454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26967526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151387
work_keys_str_mv AT daumestefan anyoneknowwhatspeciesthisistwitterconversationsasembryoniccitizensciencecommunities
AT galazvictor anyoneknowwhatspeciesthisistwitterconversationsasembryoniccitizensciencecommunities