Cargando…
Surface characterization and in vivo evaluation of laser sintered and machined implants followed by resorbable-blasting media process: A study in sheep
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the histomorphometric and histological bone response to laser-sintered implants followed by resorbable-blasting media (RBM) process relative to standard machined/RBM surface treated implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six male sheep (n=6) received 2 Ti-6Al-4V impl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medicina Oral S.L.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4788801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26827064 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.20946 |
_version_ | 1782420766885675008 |
---|---|
author | Bowers, Michelle Yoo, Daniel Marin, Charles Gil, Luiz Shabaka, Nour Goldstein, Matt Janal, Malvin Tovar, Nick Hirata, Ronaldo Bonfante, Estevam Coelho, Paulo |
author_facet | Bowers, Michelle Yoo, Daniel Marin, Charles Gil, Luiz Shabaka, Nour Goldstein, Matt Janal, Malvin Tovar, Nick Hirata, Ronaldo Bonfante, Estevam Coelho, Paulo |
author_sort | Bowers, Michelle |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the histomorphometric and histological bone response to laser-sintered implants followed by resorbable-blasting media (RBM) process relative to standard machined/RBM surface treated implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six male sheep (n=6) received 2 Ti-6Al-4V implants (1 per surface) in each side of the mandible for 6 weeks in vivo. The histomorphometric parameters bone-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) were evaluated. RESULTS: Optical interferometry revealed higher Sa and Sq values for the laser-sintered/RBM surface in relation to standard/RBM implants. No significant differences in BIC were observed between the two groups (p>0.2), but significantly higher BAFO was observed for standard/RBM implants (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that both surfaces were biocompatible and osseoconductive, and the combination of laser sintering and RBM has no advantage over the standard machined implants with subsequent RBM. Key words:Dental implants, osseointegration, resorbable- blasting media, sheep, in vivo. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4788801 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medicina Oral S.L. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47888012016-03-15 Surface characterization and in vivo evaluation of laser sintered and machined implants followed by resorbable-blasting media process: A study in sheep Bowers, Michelle Yoo, Daniel Marin, Charles Gil, Luiz Shabaka, Nour Goldstein, Matt Janal, Malvin Tovar, Nick Hirata, Ronaldo Bonfante, Estevam Coelho, Paulo Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the histomorphometric and histological bone response to laser-sintered implants followed by resorbable-blasting media (RBM) process relative to standard machined/RBM surface treated implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six male sheep (n=6) received 2 Ti-6Al-4V implants (1 per surface) in each side of the mandible for 6 weeks in vivo. The histomorphometric parameters bone-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) were evaluated. RESULTS: Optical interferometry revealed higher Sa and Sq values for the laser-sintered/RBM surface in relation to standard/RBM implants. No significant differences in BIC were observed between the two groups (p>0.2), but significantly higher BAFO was observed for standard/RBM implants (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that both surfaces were biocompatible and osseoconductive, and the combination of laser sintering and RBM has no advantage over the standard machined implants with subsequent RBM. Key words:Dental implants, osseointegration, resorbable- blasting media, sheep, in vivo. Medicina Oral S.L. 2016-03 2016-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4788801/ /pubmed/26827064 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.20946 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Bowers, Michelle Yoo, Daniel Marin, Charles Gil, Luiz Shabaka, Nour Goldstein, Matt Janal, Malvin Tovar, Nick Hirata, Ronaldo Bonfante, Estevam Coelho, Paulo Surface characterization and in vivo evaluation of laser sintered and machined implants followed by resorbable-blasting media process: A study in sheep |
title | Surface characterization and in vivo evaluation of laser sintered and machined
implants followed by resorbable-blasting media process: A study in sheep |
title_full | Surface characterization and in vivo evaluation of laser sintered and machined
implants followed by resorbable-blasting media process: A study in sheep |
title_fullStr | Surface characterization and in vivo evaluation of laser sintered and machined
implants followed by resorbable-blasting media process: A study in sheep |
title_full_unstemmed | Surface characterization and in vivo evaluation of laser sintered and machined
implants followed by resorbable-blasting media process: A study in sheep |
title_short | Surface characterization and in vivo evaluation of laser sintered and machined
implants followed by resorbable-blasting media process: A study in sheep |
title_sort | surface characterization and in vivo evaluation of laser sintered and machined
implants followed by resorbable-blasting media process: a study in sheep |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4788801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26827064 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.20946 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bowersmichelle surfacecharacterizationandinvivoevaluationoflasersinteredandmachinedimplantsfollowedbyresorbableblastingmediaprocessastudyinsheep AT yoodaniel surfacecharacterizationandinvivoevaluationoflasersinteredandmachinedimplantsfollowedbyresorbableblastingmediaprocessastudyinsheep AT marincharles surfacecharacterizationandinvivoevaluationoflasersinteredandmachinedimplantsfollowedbyresorbableblastingmediaprocessastudyinsheep AT gilluiz surfacecharacterizationandinvivoevaluationoflasersinteredandmachinedimplantsfollowedbyresorbableblastingmediaprocessastudyinsheep AT shabakanour surfacecharacterizationandinvivoevaluationoflasersinteredandmachinedimplantsfollowedbyresorbableblastingmediaprocessastudyinsheep AT goldsteinmatt surfacecharacterizationandinvivoevaluationoflasersinteredandmachinedimplantsfollowedbyresorbableblastingmediaprocessastudyinsheep AT janalmalvin surfacecharacterizationandinvivoevaluationoflasersinteredandmachinedimplantsfollowedbyresorbableblastingmediaprocessastudyinsheep AT tovarnick surfacecharacterizationandinvivoevaluationoflasersinteredandmachinedimplantsfollowedbyresorbableblastingmediaprocessastudyinsheep AT hirataronaldo surfacecharacterizationandinvivoevaluationoflasersinteredandmachinedimplantsfollowedbyresorbableblastingmediaprocessastudyinsheep AT bonfanteestevam surfacecharacterizationandinvivoevaluationoflasersinteredandmachinedimplantsfollowedbyresorbableblastingmediaprocessastudyinsheep AT coelhopaulo surfacecharacterizationandinvivoevaluationoflasersinteredandmachinedimplantsfollowedbyresorbableblastingmediaprocessastudyinsheep |