Cargando…

Surface characterization and in vivo evaluation of laser sintered and machined implants followed by resorbable-blasting media process: A study in sheep

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the histomorphometric and histological bone response to laser-sintered implants followed by resorbable-blasting media (RBM) process relative to standard machined/RBM surface treated implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six male sheep (n=6) received 2 Ti-6Al-4V impl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bowers, Michelle, Yoo, Daniel, Marin, Charles, Gil, Luiz, Shabaka, Nour, Goldstein, Matt, Janal, Malvin, Tovar, Nick, Hirata, Ronaldo, Bonfante, Estevam, Coelho, Paulo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4788801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26827064
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.20946
_version_ 1782420766885675008
author Bowers, Michelle
Yoo, Daniel
Marin, Charles
Gil, Luiz
Shabaka, Nour
Goldstein, Matt
Janal, Malvin
Tovar, Nick
Hirata, Ronaldo
Bonfante, Estevam
Coelho, Paulo
author_facet Bowers, Michelle
Yoo, Daniel
Marin, Charles
Gil, Luiz
Shabaka, Nour
Goldstein, Matt
Janal, Malvin
Tovar, Nick
Hirata, Ronaldo
Bonfante, Estevam
Coelho, Paulo
author_sort Bowers, Michelle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the histomorphometric and histological bone response to laser-sintered implants followed by resorbable-blasting media (RBM) process relative to standard machined/RBM surface treated implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six male sheep (n=6) received 2 Ti-6Al-4V implants (1 per surface) in each side of the mandible for 6 weeks in vivo. The histomorphometric parameters bone-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) were evaluated. RESULTS: Optical interferometry revealed higher Sa and Sq values for the laser-sintered/RBM surface in relation to standard/RBM implants. No significant differences in BIC were observed between the two groups (p>0.2), but significantly higher BAFO was observed for standard/RBM implants (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that both surfaces were biocompatible and osseoconductive, and the combination of laser sintering and RBM has no advantage over the standard machined implants with subsequent RBM. Key words:Dental implants, osseointegration, resorbable- blasting media, sheep, in vivo.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4788801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47888012016-03-15 Surface characterization and in vivo evaluation of laser sintered and machined implants followed by resorbable-blasting media process: A study in sheep Bowers, Michelle Yoo, Daniel Marin, Charles Gil, Luiz Shabaka, Nour Goldstein, Matt Janal, Malvin Tovar, Nick Hirata, Ronaldo Bonfante, Estevam Coelho, Paulo Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the histomorphometric and histological bone response to laser-sintered implants followed by resorbable-blasting media (RBM) process relative to standard machined/RBM surface treated implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six male sheep (n=6) received 2 Ti-6Al-4V implants (1 per surface) in each side of the mandible for 6 weeks in vivo. The histomorphometric parameters bone-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) were evaluated. RESULTS: Optical interferometry revealed higher Sa and Sq values for the laser-sintered/RBM surface in relation to standard/RBM implants. No significant differences in BIC were observed between the two groups (p>0.2), but significantly higher BAFO was observed for standard/RBM implants (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that both surfaces were biocompatible and osseoconductive, and the combination of laser sintering and RBM has no advantage over the standard machined implants with subsequent RBM. Key words:Dental implants, osseointegration, resorbable- blasting media, sheep, in vivo. Medicina Oral S.L. 2016-03 2016-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4788801/ /pubmed/26827064 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.20946 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Bowers, Michelle
Yoo, Daniel
Marin, Charles
Gil, Luiz
Shabaka, Nour
Goldstein, Matt
Janal, Malvin
Tovar, Nick
Hirata, Ronaldo
Bonfante, Estevam
Coelho, Paulo
Surface characterization and in vivo evaluation of laser sintered and machined implants followed by resorbable-blasting media process: A study in sheep
title Surface characterization and in vivo evaluation of laser sintered and machined implants followed by resorbable-blasting media process: A study in sheep
title_full Surface characterization and in vivo evaluation of laser sintered and machined implants followed by resorbable-blasting media process: A study in sheep
title_fullStr Surface characterization and in vivo evaluation of laser sintered and machined implants followed by resorbable-blasting media process: A study in sheep
title_full_unstemmed Surface characterization and in vivo evaluation of laser sintered and machined implants followed by resorbable-blasting media process: A study in sheep
title_short Surface characterization and in vivo evaluation of laser sintered and machined implants followed by resorbable-blasting media process: A study in sheep
title_sort surface characterization and in vivo evaluation of laser sintered and machined implants followed by resorbable-blasting media process: a study in sheep
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4788801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26827064
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.20946
work_keys_str_mv AT bowersmichelle surfacecharacterizationandinvivoevaluationoflasersinteredandmachinedimplantsfollowedbyresorbableblastingmediaprocessastudyinsheep
AT yoodaniel surfacecharacterizationandinvivoevaluationoflasersinteredandmachinedimplantsfollowedbyresorbableblastingmediaprocessastudyinsheep
AT marincharles surfacecharacterizationandinvivoevaluationoflasersinteredandmachinedimplantsfollowedbyresorbableblastingmediaprocessastudyinsheep
AT gilluiz surfacecharacterizationandinvivoevaluationoflasersinteredandmachinedimplantsfollowedbyresorbableblastingmediaprocessastudyinsheep
AT shabakanour surfacecharacterizationandinvivoevaluationoflasersinteredandmachinedimplantsfollowedbyresorbableblastingmediaprocessastudyinsheep
AT goldsteinmatt surfacecharacterizationandinvivoevaluationoflasersinteredandmachinedimplantsfollowedbyresorbableblastingmediaprocessastudyinsheep
AT janalmalvin surfacecharacterizationandinvivoevaluationoflasersinteredandmachinedimplantsfollowedbyresorbableblastingmediaprocessastudyinsheep
AT tovarnick surfacecharacterizationandinvivoevaluationoflasersinteredandmachinedimplantsfollowedbyresorbableblastingmediaprocessastudyinsheep
AT hirataronaldo surfacecharacterizationandinvivoevaluationoflasersinteredandmachinedimplantsfollowedbyresorbableblastingmediaprocessastudyinsheep
AT bonfanteestevam surfacecharacterizationandinvivoevaluationoflasersinteredandmachinedimplantsfollowedbyresorbableblastingmediaprocessastudyinsheep
AT coelhopaulo surfacecharacterizationandinvivoevaluationoflasersinteredandmachinedimplantsfollowedbyresorbableblastingmediaprocessastudyinsheep