Cargando…

Long-term outcome of dental implants after maxillary augmentation with and without bone grafting

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the technique of sinus bone reformation, which consists of elevating the sinus membrane and placement the implant without bone graft, compared with the widely-used technique involving raising the maxillary sinus and grafting, using animal hydroxyapatite as the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cara-Fuentes, Manuel, Machuca-Ariza, Jesús, Ruiz-Martos, Alberto, Ramos-Robles, Mª-Carmen, Martínez-Lara, Ildefonso
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4788804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26827071
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.21055
_version_ 1782420767581929472
author Cara-Fuentes, Manuel
Machuca-Ariza, Jesús
Ruiz-Martos, Alberto
Ramos-Robles, Mª-Carmen
Martínez-Lara, Ildefonso
author_facet Cara-Fuentes, Manuel
Machuca-Ariza, Jesús
Ruiz-Martos, Alberto
Ramos-Robles, Mª-Carmen
Martínez-Lara, Ildefonso
author_sort Cara-Fuentes, Manuel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the technique of sinus bone reformation, which consists of elevating the sinus membrane and placement the implant without bone graft, compared with the widely-used technique involving raising the maxillary sinus and grafting, using animal hydroxyapatite as the filler, while simultaneously fixing the implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study on two groups of patients who underwent elevation of the sinus membrane and simultaneous placement of the implant. The grafting technique was applied to one group, while the other had no graft. An alveolar ridge height of 4 to 7 mm was necessary. Radiological control was undertaken at 6 months and one year post-prosthetic loading. In each group 38 implants were placed. RESULTS: No significant behavioural differences were observed in the implants according to the Albrektsson success criteria. Implant failure was observed in 2 implants from the bone grafting group (success rate 93%) and in 1 implant from the reformation group (success rate 97%). In this group, bone formation was observed on both sides of each implant, the bone gain was measured using image management software (2.7±0.9mm mesial and 2.6±0.9mm distal). There was no correlation between mesial and distal bone gain and implant´s length. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that bone reformation is a valid technique in cases involving atrophy of the posterior maxilla. Primary stability, maintenance of space by the implant, and the formation of a blood clot are crucial in this technique in order to achieve bone formation around the implant. It is an alternative to the conventional technique of sinus lift with filling material, and has several advantages over this procedure, including a lower infection risk, as it does not involve a biomaterial, reduced cost, a simpler technique, and better acceptance by the patient. Key words:Bone formation, sinus membrane elevation, maxillary sinus, bone grafting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4788804
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47888042016-03-15 Long-term outcome of dental implants after maxillary augmentation with and without bone grafting Cara-Fuentes, Manuel Machuca-Ariza, Jesús Ruiz-Martos, Alberto Ramos-Robles, Mª-Carmen Martínez-Lara, Ildefonso Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Research BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the technique of sinus bone reformation, which consists of elevating the sinus membrane and placement the implant without bone graft, compared with the widely-used technique involving raising the maxillary sinus and grafting, using animal hydroxyapatite as the filler, while simultaneously fixing the implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study on two groups of patients who underwent elevation of the sinus membrane and simultaneous placement of the implant. The grafting technique was applied to one group, while the other had no graft. An alveolar ridge height of 4 to 7 mm was necessary. Radiological control was undertaken at 6 months and one year post-prosthetic loading. In each group 38 implants were placed. RESULTS: No significant behavioural differences were observed in the implants according to the Albrektsson success criteria. Implant failure was observed in 2 implants from the bone grafting group (success rate 93%) and in 1 implant from the reformation group (success rate 97%). In this group, bone formation was observed on both sides of each implant, the bone gain was measured using image management software (2.7±0.9mm mesial and 2.6±0.9mm distal). There was no correlation between mesial and distal bone gain and implant´s length. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that bone reformation is a valid technique in cases involving atrophy of the posterior maxilla. Primary stability, maintenance of space by the implant, and the formation of a blood clot are crucial in this technique in order to achieve bone formation around the implant. It is an alternative to the conventional technique of sinus lift with filling material, and has several advantages over this procedure, including a lower infection risk, as it does not involve a biomaterial, reduced cost, a simpler technique, and better acceptance by the patient. Key words:Bone formation, sinus membrane elevation, maxillary sinus, bone grafting. Medicina Oral S.L. 2016-03 2016-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4788804/ /pubmed/26827071 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.21055 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Cara-Fuentes, Manuel
Machuca-Ariza, Jesús
Ruiz-Martos, Alberto
Ramos-Robles, Mª-Carmen
Martínez-Lara, Ildefonso
Long-term outcome of dental implants after maxillary augmentation with and without bone grafting
title Long-term outcome of dental implants after maxillary augmentation with and without bone grafting
title_full Long-term outcome of dental implants after maxillary augmentation with and without bone grafting
title_fullStr Long-term outcome of dental implants after maxillary augmentation with and without bone grafting
title_full_unstemmed Long-term outcome of dental implants after maxillary augmentation with and without bone grafting
title_short Long-term outcome of dental implants after maxillary augmentation with and without bone grafting
title_sort long-term outcome of dental implants after maxillary augmentation with and without bone grafting
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4788804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26827071
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.21055
work_keys_str_mv AT carafuentesmanuel longtermoutcomeofdentalimplantsaftermaxillaryaugmentationwithandwithoutbonegrafting
AT machucaarizajesus longtermoutcomeofdentalimplantsaftermaxillaryaugmentationwithandwithoutbonegrafting
AT ruizmartosalberto longtermoutcomeofdentalimplantsaftermaxillaryaugmentationwithandwithoutbonegrafting
AT ramosroblesmacarmen longtermoutcomeofdentalimplantsaftermaxillaryaugmentationwithandwithoutbonegrafting
AT martinezlaraildefonso longtermoutcomeofdentalimplantsaftermaxillaryaugmentationwithandwithoutbonegrafting