Cargando…

Confidence intervals construction for difference of two means with incomplete correlated data

BACKGROUND: Incomplete data often arise in various clinical trials such as crossover trials, equivalence trials, and pre and post-test comparative studies. Various methods have been developed to construct confidence interval (CI) of risk difference or risk ratio for incomplete paired binary data. Bu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Hui-Qiong, Tang, Nian-Sheng, Yi, Jie-Yi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4788928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26969507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0125-3
_version_ 1782420793329713152
author Li, Hui-Qiong
Tang, Nian-Sheng
Yi, Jie-Yi
author_facet Li, Hui-Qiong
Tang, Nian-Sheng
Yi, Jie-Yi
author_sort Li, Hui-Qiong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Incomplete data often arise in various clinical trials such as crossover trials, equivalence trials, and pre and post-test comparative studies. Various methods have been developed to construct confidence interval (CI) of risk difference or risk ratio for incomplete paired binary data. But, there is little works done on incomplete continuous correlated data. To this end, this manuscript aims to develop several approaches to construct CI of the difference of two means for incomplete continuous correlated data. METHODS: Large sample method, hybrid method, simple Bootstrap-resampling method based on the maximum likelihood estimates (B(1)) and Ekbohm’s unbiased estimator (B(2)), and percentile Bootstrap-resampling method based on the maximum likelihood estimates (B(3)) and Ekbohm’s unbiased estimator (B(4)) are presented to construct CI of the difference of two means for incomplete continuous correlated data. Simulation studies are conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed CIs in terms of empirical coverage probability, expected interval width, and mesial and distal non-coverage probabilities. RESULTS: Empirical results show that the Bootstrap-resampling-based CIs B(1), B(2), B(4) behave satisfactorily for small to moderate sample sizes in the sense that their coverage probabilities could be well controlled around the pre-specified nominal confidence level and the ratio of their mesial non-coverage probabilities to the non-coverage probabilities could be well controlled in the interval [0.4, 0.6]. CONCLUSIONS: If one would like a CI with the shortest interval width, the Bootstrap-resampling-based CIs B(1) is the optimal choice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4788928
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47889282016-03-13 Confidence intervals construction for difference of two means with incomplete correlated data Li, Hui-Qiong Tang, Nian-Sheng Yi, Jie-Yi BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Incomplete data often arise in various clinical trials such as crossover trials, equivalence trials, and pre and post-test comparative studies. Various methods have been developed to construct confidence interval (CI) of risk difference or risk ratio for incomplete paired binary data. But, there is little works done on incomplete continuous correlated data. To this end, this manuscript aims to develop several approaches to construct CI of the difference of two means for incomplete continuous correlated data. METHODS: Large sample method, hybrid method, simple Bootstrap-resampling method based on the maximum likelihood estimates (B(1)) and Ekbohm’s unbiased estimator (B(2)), and percentile Bootstrap-resampling method based on the maximum likelihood estimates (B(3)) and Ekbohm’s unbiased estimator (B(4)) are presented to construct CI of the difference of two means for incomplete continuous correlated data. Simulation studies are conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed CIs in terms of empirical coverage probability, expected interval width, and mesial and distal non-coverage probabilities. RESULTS: Empirical results show that the Bootstrap-resampling-based CIs B(1), B(2), B(4) behave satisfactorily for small to moderate sample sizes in the sense that their coverage probabilities could be well controlled around the pre-specified nominal confidence level and the ratio of their mesial non-coverage probabilities to the non-coverage probabilities could be well controlled in the interval [0.4, 0.6]. CONCLUSIONS: If one would like a CI with the shortest interval width, the Bootstrap-resampling-based CIs B(1) is the optimal choice. BioMed Central 2016-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4788928/ /pubmed/26969507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0125-3 Text en © Li et al. 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Hui-Qiong
Tang, Nian-Sheng
Yi, Jie-Yi
Confidence intervals construction for difference of two means with incomplete correlated data
title Confidence intervals construction for difference of two means with incomplete correlated data
title_full Confidence intervals construction for difference of two means with incomplete correlated data
title_fullStr Confidence intervals construction for difference of two means with incomplete correlated data
title_full_unstemmed Confidence intervals construction for difference of two means with incomplete correlated data
title_short Confidence intervals construction for difference of two means with incomplete correlated data
title_sort confidence intervals construction for difference of two means with incomplete correlated data
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4788928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26969507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0125-3
work_keys_str_mv AT lihuiqiong confidenceintervalsconstructionfordifferenceoftwomeanswithincompletecorrelateddata
AT tangniansheng confidenceintervalsconstructionfordifferenceoftwomeanswithincompletecorrelateddata
AT yijieyi confidenceintervalsconstructionfordifferenceoftwomeanswithincompletecorrelateddata