Cargando…

A Comparative Study in Learning Curves of Two Different Intracorporeal Knot Tying Techniques

Objectives. In our study we are aiming to analyse the learning curves in our surgical trainees by using two standard methods of intracorporeal knot tying. Material and Method. Two randomized groups of trainees are trained with two different intracorporeal knot tying techniques (loop and winding) by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thiyagarajan, Manuneethimaran, Ravindrakumar, Chandru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4789041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27022482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3059434
_version_ 1782420807865073664
author Thiyagarajan, Manuneethimaran
Ravindrakumar, Chandru
author_facet Thiyagarajan, Manuneethimaran
Ravindrakumar, Chandru
author_sort Thiyagarajan, Manuneethimaran
collection PubMed
description Objectives. In our study we are aiming to analyse the learning curves in our surgical trainees by using two standard methods of intracorporeal knot tying. Material and Method. Two randomized groups of trainees are trained with two different intracorporeal knot tying techniques (loop and winding) by single surgeon for eight sessions. In each session participants were allowed to make as many numbers of knots in thirty minutes. The duration for each set of knots and the number of knots for each session were calculated. At the end each session, participants were asked about their frustration level, difficulty in making knot, and dexterity. Results. In winding method the number of knots tied was increasing significantly in each session with less frustration and less difficulty level. Discussion. The suturing and knotting skill improved in every session in both groups. But group B (winding method) trainees made significantly higher number of knots and they took less time for each set of knots than group A (loop method). Although both knotting methods are standard methods, the learning curve is better in loop method. Conclusion. The winding method of knotting is simpler and easier to perform, especially for the surgeons who have limited laparoscopic experience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4789041
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47890412016-03-28 A Comparative Study in Learning Curves of Two Different Intracorporeal Knot Tying Techniques Thiyagarajan, Manuneethimaran Ravindrakumar, Chandru Minim Invasive Surg Research Article Objectives. In our study we are aiming to analyse the learning curves in our surgical trainees by using two standard methods of intracorporeal knot tying. Material and Method. Two randomized groups of trainees are trained with two different intracorporeal knot tying techniques (loop and winding) by single surgeon for eight sessions. In each session participants were allowed to make as many numbers of knots in thirty minutes. The duration for each set of knots and the number of knots for each session were calculated. At the end each session, participants were asked about their frustration level, difficulty in making knot, and dexterity. Results. In winding method the number of knots tied was increasing significantly in each session with less frustration and less difficulty level. Discussion. The suturing and knotting skill improved in every session in both groups. But group B (winding method) trainees made significantly higher number of knots and they took less time for each set of knots than group A (loop method). Although both knotting methods are standard methods, the learning curve is better in loop method. Conclusion. The winding method of knotting is simpler and easier to perform, especially for the surgeons who have limited laparoscopic experience. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4789041/ /pubmed/27022482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3059434 Text en Copyright © 2016 M. Thiyagarajan and C. Ravindrakumar. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Thiyagarajan, Manuneethimaran
Ravindrakumar, Chandru
A Comparative Study in Learning Curves of Two Different Intracorporeal Knot Tying Techniques
title A Comparative Study in Learning Curves of Two Different Intracorporeal Knot Tying Techniques
title_full A Comparative Study in Learning Curves of Two Different Intracorporeal Knot Tying Techniques
title_fullStr A Comparative Study in Learning Curves of Two Different Intracorporeal Knot Tying Techniques
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study in Learning Curves of Two Different Intracorporeal Knot Tying Techniques
title_short A Comparative Study in Learning Curves of Two Different Intracorporeal Knot Tying Techniques
title_sort comparative study in learning curves of two different intracorporeal knot tying techniques
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4789041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27022482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3059434
work_keys_str_mv AT thiyagarajanmanuneethimaran acomparativestudyinlearningcurvesoftwodifferentintracorporealknottyingtechniques
AT ravindrakumarchandru acomparativestudyinlearningcurvesoftwodifferentintracorporealknottyingtechniques
AT thiyagarajanmanuneethimaran comparativestudyinlearningcurvesoftwodifferentintracorporealknottyingtechniques
AT ravindrakumarchandru comparativestudyinlearningcurvesoftwodifferentintracorporealknottyingtechniques