Cargando…
A Comparative Study in Learning Curves of Two Different Intracorporeal Knot Tying Techniques
Objectives. In our study we are aiming to analyse the learning curves in our surgical trainees by using two standard methods of intracorporeal knot tying. Material and Method. Two randomized groups of trainees are trained with two different intracorporeal knot tying techniques (loop and winding) by...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4789041/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27022482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3059434 |
_version_ | 1782420807865073664 |
---|---|
author | Thiyagarajan, Manuneethimaran Ravindrakumar, Chandru |
author_facet | Thiyagarajan, Manuneethimaran Ravindrakumar, Chandru |
author_sort | Thiyagarajan, Manuneethimaran |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives. In our study we are aiming to analyse the learning curves in our surgical trainees by using two standard methods of intracorporeal knot tying. Material and Method. Two randomized groups of trainees are trained with two different intracorporeal knot tying techniques (loop and winding) by single surgeon for eight sessions. In each session participants were allowed to make as many numbers of knots in thirty minutes. The duration for each set of knots and the number of knots for each session were calculated. At the end each session, participants were asked about their frustration level, difficulty in making knot, and dexterity. Results. In winding method the number of knots tied was increasing significantly in each session with less frustration and less difficulty level. Discussion. The suturing and knotting skill improved in every session in both groups. But group B (winding method) trainees made significantly higher number of knots and they took less time for each set of knots than group A (loop method). Although both knotting methods are standard methods, the learning curve is better in loop method. Conclusion. The winding method of knotting is simpler and easier to perform, especially for the surgeons who have limited laparoscopic experience. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4789041 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47890412016-03-28 A Comparative Study in Learning Curves of Two Different Intracorporeal Knot Tying Techniques Thiyagarajan, Manuneethimaran Ravindrakumar, Chandru Minim Invasive Surg Research Article Objectives. In our study we are aiming to analyse the learning curves in our surgical trainees by using two standard methods of intracorporeal knot tying. Material and Method. Two randomized groups of trainees are trained with two different intracorporeal knot tying techniques (loop and winding) by single surgeon for eight sessions. In each session participants were allowed to make as many numbers of knots in thirty minutes. The duration for each set of knots and the number of knots for each session were calculated. At the end each session, participants were asked about their frustration level, difficulty in making knot, and dexterity. Results. In winding method the number of knots tied was increasing significantly in each session with less frustration and less difficulty level. Discussion. The suturing and knotting skill improved in every session in both groups. But group B (winding method) trainees made significantly higher number of knots and they took less time for each set of knots than group A (loop method). Although both knotting methods are standard methods, the learning curve is better in loop method. Conclusion. The winding method of knotting is simpler and easier to perform, especially for the surgeons who have limited laparoscopic experience. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4789041/ /pubmed/27022482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3059434 Text en Copyright © 2016 M. Thiyagarajan and C. Ravindrakumar. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Thiyagarajan, Manuneethimaran Ravindrakumar, Chandru A Comparative Study in Learning Curves of Two Different Intracorporeal Knot Tying Techniques |
title | A Comparative Study in Learning Curves of Two Different Intracorporeal Knot Tying Techniques |
title_full | A Comparative Study in Learning Curves of Two Different Intracorporeal Knot Tying Techniques |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Study in Learning Curves of Two Different Intracorporeal Knot Tying Techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Study in Learning Curves of Two Different Intracorporeal Knot Tying Techniques |
title_short | A Comparative Study in Learning Curves of Two Different Intracorporeal Knot Tying Techniques |
title_sort | comparative study in learning curves of two different intracorporeal knot tying techniques |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4789041/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27022482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3059434 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thiyagarajanmanuneethimaran acomparativestudyinlearningcurvesoftwodifferentintracorporealknottyingtechniques AT ravindrakumarchandru acomparativestudyinlearningcurvesoftwodifferentintracorporealknottyingtechniques AT thiyagarajanmanuneethimaran comparativestudyinlearningcurvesoftwodifferentintracorporealknottyingtechniques AT ravindrakumarchandru comparativestudyinlearningcurvesoftwodifferentintracorporealknottyingtechniques |