Cargando…

Adaptive graph-based multiple testing procedures

Multiple testing procedures defined by directed, weighted graphs have recently been proposed as an intuitive visual tool for constructing multiple testing strategies that reflect the often complex contextual relations between hypotheses in clinical trials. Many well-known sequentially rejective test...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klinglmueller, Florian, Posch, Martin, Koenig, Franz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4789493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25319733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pst.1640
_version_ 1782420866347302912
author Klinglmueller, Florian
Posch, Martin
Koenig, Franz
author_facet Klinglmueller, Florian
Posch, Martin
Koenig, Franz
author_sort Klinglmueller, Florian
collection PubMed
description Multiple testing procedures defined by directed, weighted graphs have recently been proposed as an intuitive visual tool for constructing multiple testing strategies that reflect the often complex contextual relations between hypotheses in clinical trials. Many well-known sequentially rejective tests, such as (parallel) gatekeeping tests or hierarchical testing procedures are special cases of the graph based tests. We generalize these graph-based multiple testing procedures to adaptive trial designs with an interim analysis. These designs permit mid-trial design modifications based on unblinded interim data as well as external information, while providing strong family wise error rate control. To maintain the familywise error rate, it is not required to prespecify the adaption rule in detail. Because the adaptive test does not require knowledge of the multivariate distribution of test statistics, it is applicable in a wide range of scenarios including trials with multiple treatment comparisons, endpoints or subgroups, or combinations thereof. Examples of adaptations are dropping of treatment arms, selection of subpopulations, and sample size reassessment. If, in the interim analysis, it is decided to continue the trial as planned, the adaptive test reduces to the originally planned multiple testing procedure. Only if adaptations are actually implemented, an adjusted test needs to be applied. The procedure is illustrated with a case study and its operating characteristics are investigated by simulations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4789493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47894932016-03-14 Adaptive graph-based multiple testing procedures Klinglmueller, Florian Posch, Martin Koenig, Franz Pharm Stat Article Multiple testing procedures defined by directed, weighted graphs have recently been proposed as an intuitive visual tool for constructing multiple testing strategies that reflect the often complex contextual relations between hypotheses in clinical trials. Many well-known sequentially rejective tests, such as (parallel) gatekeeping tests or hierarchical testing procedures are special cases of the graph based tests. We generalize these graph-based multiple testing procedures to adaptive trial designs with an interim analysis. These designs permit mid-trial design modifications based on unblinded interim data as well as external information, while providing strong family wise error rate control. To maintain the familywise error rate, it is not required to prespecify the adaption rule in detail. Because the adaptive test does not require knowledge of the multivariate distribution of test statistics, it is applicable in a wide range of scenarios including trials with multiple treatment comparisons, endpoints or subgroups, or combinations thereof. Examples of adaptations are dropping of treatment arms, selection of subpopulations, and sample size reassessment. If, in the interim analysis, it is decided to continue the trial as planned, the adaptive test reduces to the originally planned multiple testing procedure. Only if adaptations are actually implemented, an adjusted test needs to be applied. The procedure is illustrated with a case study and its operating characteristics are investigated by simulations. 2014-10-16 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4789493/ /pubmed/25319733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pst.1640 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Klinglmueller, Florian
Posch, Martin
Koenig, Franz
Adaptive graph-based multiple testing procedures
title Adaptive graph-based multiple testing procedures
title_full Adaptive graph-based multiple testing procedures
title_fullStr Adaptive graph-based multiple testing procedures
title_full_unstemmed Adaptive graph-based multiple testing procedures
title_short Adaptive graph-based multiple testing procedures
title_sort adaptive graph-based multiple testing procedures
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4789493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25319733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pst.1640
work_keys_str_mv AT klinglmuellerflorian adaptivegraphbasedmultipletestingprocedures
AT poschmartin adaptivegraphbasedmultipletestingprocedures
AT koenigfranz adaptivegraphbasedmultipletestingprocedures