Cargando…

The Diagnostic Value of Skin Disease Diagnosis Expert System

BACKGROUND: Evaluation is a necessary measure to ensure the effectiveness and efficiency of all systems, including expert systems. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of expert system for diagnosis of complex skin diseases. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted in 2015...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeddi, Fatemeh Rangraz, Arabfard, Masoud, Arabkermany, Zahra, Gilasi, Hamidreza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4789723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27046943
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2016.24.30-33
_version_ 1782420906445897728
author Jeddi, Fatemeh Rangraz
Arabfard, Masoud
Arabkermany, Zahra
Gilasi, Hamidreza
author_facet Jeddi, Fatemeh Rangraz
Arabfard, Masoud
Arabkermany, Zahra
Gilasi, Hamidreza
author_sort Jeddi, Fatemeh Rangraz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evaluation is a necessary measure to ensure the effectiveness and efficiency of all systems, including expert systems. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of expert system for diagnosis of complex skin diseases. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted in 2015 to determine the diagnostic value of an expert system. The study population included patients who were referred to Razi Specialized Hospital, affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences. The control group was selected from patients without the selected skin diseases. Data collection tool was a checklist of clinical signs of diseases including pemphigus vulgaris, lichen planus, basal cell carcinoma, melanoma, and scabies. The sample size formula estimated 400 patients with skin diseases selected by experts and 200 patients without the selected skin diseases. Patient selection was undertaken with randomized stratified sampling and their sign and symptoms were logged into the system. Physician’s diagnosis was determined as the gold standard and was compared with the diagnosis of expert system by SPSS software version 16 and STATA. Kappa statistics, indicators of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and confidence intervals were calculated for each disease. An accuracy of 90% was considered appropriate. RESULTS: Comparing the results of expert system and physician’s diagnosis at the evaluation stage showed an accuracy of 97.1%, sensitivity of 97.5% and specificity of 96.5% The Kappa test indicated a high agreement of 93.6%. CONCLUSION: The expert system can diagnose complex skin diseases. Development of such systems is recommended to identify all skin diseases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4789723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47897232016-04-04 The Diagnostic Value of Skin Disease Diagnosis Expert System Jeddi, Fatemeh Rangraz Arabfard, Masoud Arabkermany, Zahra Gilasi, Hamidreza Acta Inform Med Original Paper BACKGROUND: Evaluation is a necessary measure to ensure the effectiveness and efficiency of all systems, including expert systems. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of expert system for diagnosis of complex skin diseases. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted in 2015 to determine the diagnostic value of an expert system. The study population included patients who were referred to Razi Specialized Hospital, affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences. The control group was selected from patients without the selected skin diseases. Data collection tool was a checklist of clinical signs of diseases including pemphigus vulgaris, lichen planus, basal cell carcinoma, melanoma, and scabies. The sample size formula estimated 400 patients with skin diseases selected by experts and 200 patients without the selected skin diseases. Patient selection was undertaken with randomized stratified sampling and their sign and symptoms were logged into the system. Physician’s diagnosis was determined as the gold standard and was compared with the diagnosis of expert system by SPSS software version 16 and STATA. Kappa statistics, indicators of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and confidence intervals were calculated for each disease. An accuracy of 90% was considered appropriate. RESULTS: Comparing the results of expert system and physician’s diagnosis at the evaluation stage showed an accuracy of 97.1%, sensitivity of 97.5% and specificity of 96.5% The Kappa test indicated a high agreement of 93.6%. CONCLUSION: The expert system can diagnose complex skin diseases. Development of such systems is recommended to identify all skin diseases. AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2016-02 2016-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4789723/ /pubmed/27046943 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2016.24.30-33 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Fatemeh Rangraz Jeddi, Masoud Arabfard, Zahra Arbkermany, Hamidreza Gilasi http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Jeddi, Fatemeh Rangraz
Arabfard, Masoud
Arabkermany, Zahra
Gilasi, Hamidreza
The Diagnostic Value of Skin Disease Diagnosis Expert System
title The Diagnostic Value of Skin Disease Diagnosis Expert System
title_full The Diagnostic Value of Skin Disease Diagnosis Expert System
title_fullStr The Diagnostic Value of Skin Disease Diagnosis Expert System
title_full_unstemmed The Diagnostic Value of Skin Disease Diagnosis Expert System
title_short The Diagnostic Value of Skin Disease Diagnosis Expert System
title_sort diagnostic value of skin disease diagnosis expert system
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4789723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27046943
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2016.24.30-33
work_keys_str_mv AT jeddifatemehrangraz thediagnosticvalueofskindiseasediagnosisexpertsystem
AT arabfardmasoud thediagnosticvalueofskindiseasediagnosisexpertsystem
AT arabkermanyzahra thediagnosticvalueofskindiseasediagnosisexpertsystem
AT gilasihamidreza thediagnosticvalueofskindiseasediagnosisexpertsystem
AT jeddifatemehrangraz diagnosticvalueofskindiseasediagnosisexpertsystem
AT arabfardmasoud diagnosticvalueofskindiseasediagnosisexpertsystem
AT arabkermanyzahra diagnosticvalueofskindiseasediagnosisexpertsystem
AT gilasihamidreza diagnosticvalueofskindiseasediagnosisexpertsystem