Cargando…
The Diagnostic Value of Skin Disease Diagnosis Expert System
BACKGROUND: Evaluation is a necessary measure to ensure the effectiveness and efficiency of all systems, including expert systems. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of expert system for diagnosis of complex skin diseases. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted in 2015...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4789723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27046943 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2016.24.30-33 |
_version_ | 1782420906445897728 |
---|---|
author | Jeddi, Fatemeh Rangraz Arabfard, Masoud Arabkermany, Zahra Gilasi, Hamidreza |
author_facet | Jeddi, Fatemeh Rangraz Arabfard, Masoud Arabkermany, Zahra Gilasi, Hamidreza |
author_sort | Jeddi, Fatemeh Rangraz |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Evaluation is a necessary measure to ensure the effectiveness and efficiency of all systems, including expert systems. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of expert system for diagnosis of complex skin diseases. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted in 2015 to determine the diagnostic value of an expert system. The study population included patients who were referred to Razi Specialized Hospital, affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences. The control group was selected from patients without the selected skin diseases. Data collection tool was a checklist of clinical signs of diseases including pemphigus vulgaris, lichen planus, basal cell carcinoma, melanoma, and scabies. The sample size formula estimated 400 patients with skin diseases selected by experts and 200 patients without the selected skin diseases. Patient selection was undertaken with randomized stratified sampling and their sign and symptoms were logged into the system. Physician’s diagnosis was determined as the gold standard and was compared with the diagnosis of expert system by SPSS software version 16 and STATA. Kappa statistics, indicators of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and confidence intervals were calculated for each disease. An accuracy of 90% was considered appropriate. RESULTS: Comparing the results of expert system and physician’s diagnosis at the evaluation stage showed an accuracy of 97.1%, sensitivity of 97.5% and specificity of 96.5% The Kappa test indicated a high agreement of 93.6%. CONCLUSION: The expert system can diagnose complex skin diseases. Development of such systems is recommended to identify all skin diseases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4789723 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47897232016-04-04 The Diagnostic Value of Skin Disease Diagnosis Expert System Jeddi, Fatemeh Rangraz Arabfard, Masoud Arabkermany, Zahra Gilasi, Hamidreza Acta Inform Med Original Paper BACKGROUND: Evaluation is a necessary measure to ensure the effectiveness and efficiency of all systems, including expert systems. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of expert system for diagnosis of complex skin diseases. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted in 2015 to determine the diagnostic value of an expert system. The study population included patients who were referred to Razi Specialized Hospital, affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences. The control group was selected from patients without the selected skin diseases. Data collection tool was a checklist of clinical signs of diseases including pemphigus vulgaris, lichen planus, basal cell carcinoma, melanoma, and scabies. The sample size formula estimated 400 patients with skin diseases selected by experts and 200 patients without the selected skin diseases. Patient selection was undertaken with randomized stratified sampling and their sign and symptoms were logged into the system. Physician’s diagnosis was determined as the gold standard and was compared with the diagnosis of expert system by SPSS software version 16 and STATA. Kappa statistics, indicators of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and confidence intervals were calculated for each disease. An accuracy of 90% was considered appropriate. RESULTS: Comparing the results of expert system and physician’s diagnosis at the evaluation stage showed an accuracy of 97.1%, sensitivity of 97.5% and specificity of 96.5% The Kappa test indicated a high agreement of 93.6%. CONCLUSION: The expert system can diagnose complex skin diseases. Development of such systems is recommended to identify all skin diseases. AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2016-02 2016-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4789723/ /pubmed/27046943 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2016.24.30-33 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Fatemeh Rangraz Jeddi, Masoud Arabfard, Zahra Arbkermany, Hamidreza Gilasi http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Jeddi, Fatemeh Rangraz Arabfard, Masoud Arabkermany, Zahra Gilasi, Hamidreza The Diagnostic Value of Skin Disease Diagnosis Expert System |
title | The Diagnostic Value of Skin Disease Diagnosis Expert System |
title_full | The Diagnostic Value of Skin Disease Diagnosis Expert System |
title_fullStr | The Diagnostic Value of Skin Disease Diagnosis Expert System |
title_full_unstemmed | The Diagnostic Value of Skin Disease Diagnosis Expert System |
title_short | The Diagnostic Value of Skin Disease Diagnosis Expert System |
title_sort | diagnostic value of skin disease diagnosis expert system |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4789723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27046943 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2016.24.30-33 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jeddifatemehrangraz thediagnosticvalueofskindiseasediagnosisexpertsystem AT arabfardmasoud thediagnosticvalueofskindiseasediagnosisexpertsystem AT arabkermanyzahra thediagnosticvalueofskindiseasediagnosisexpertsystem AT gilasihamidreza thediagnosticvalueofskindiseasediagnosisexpertsystem AT jeddifatemehrangraz diagnosticvalueofskindiseasediagnosisexpertsystem AT arabfardmasoud diagnosticvalueofskindiseasediagnosisexpertsystem AT arabkermanyzahra diagnosticvalueofskindiseasediagnosisexpertsystem AT gilasihamidreza diagnosticvalueofskindiseasediagnosisexpertsystem |