Cargando…

Upright magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine: Back pain and radiculopathy

BACKGROUND: Lumbar back pain and radiculopathy are common diagnoses. Unfortunately, conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and clinical symptoms do not necessarily correlate in the lumbar spine. With upright imaging, disc pathologies or foraminal stenosis may become more salient, lea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nguyen, Ha Son, Doan, Ninh, Shabani, Saman, Baisden, Jamie, Wolfla, Christopher, Paskoff, Glenn, Shender, Barry, Stemper, Brian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4790145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27041883
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.176619
_version_ 1782420947552174080
author Nguyen, Ha Son
Doan, Ninh
Shabani, Saman
Baisden, Jamie
Wolfla, Christopher
Paskoff, Glenn
Shender, Barry
Stemper, Brian
author_facet Nguyen, Ha Son
Doan, Ninh
Shabani, Saman
Baisden, Jamie
Wolfla, Christopher
Paskoff, Glenn
Shender, Barry
Stemper, Brian
author_sort Nguyen, Ha Son
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lumbar back pain and radiculopathy are common diagnoses. Unfortunately, conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and clinical symptoms do not necessarily correlate in the lumbar spine. With upright imaging, disc pathologies or foraminal stenosis may become more salient, leading to improvements in diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen adults (10 asymptomatic and 7 symptomatic volunteers) provided their informed consent and participated in the study. A 0.6T upright MRI scan was performed on each adult in the seated position. Parameters were obtained from the L2/3 level to the L5/S1 level including those pertaining to the foramen [cross-sectional area (CSA), height, mid-disc width, width, thickness of ligamentum flavum], disc (bulge, height, width), vertebral body (height and width), and alignment (lordosis angle, wedge angle, lumbosacral angle). Each parameter was compared based on the spinal level and volunteer group using two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA). Bonferroni post hoc analysis was used to assess the differences between individual spinal levels. RESULTS: Mid-disc width accounted for 56% of maximum foramen width in symptomatic volunteers and over 63% in asymptomatic volunteers. Disc bulge was 48% greater in symptomatic volunteers compared to asymptomatic volunteers. CSA was generally smaller in symptomatic volunteers compared to asymptomatic volunteers, particularly at the L4-L5 and L5-S1 spinal levels. Thickness of ligamentum flavum (TLF) generally increased from the cranial to caudal spinal levels where the L4-L5 and L5-S1 spinal levels were significantly thicker than the L1-L2 spinal level. CONCLUSIONS: The data implied that upright MRI could be a useful diagnostic option, as it can delineate pertinent differences between symptomatic volunteers and asymptomatic volunteers, especially with respect to foraminal geometry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4790145
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47901452016-04-01 Upright magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine: Back pain and radiculopathy Nguyen, Ha Son Doan, Ninh Shabani, Saman Baisden, Jamie Wolfla, Christopher Paskoff, Glenn Shender, Barry Stemper, Brian J Craniovertebr Junction Spine Original Article BACKGROUND: Lumbar back pain and radiculopathy are common diagnoses. Unfortunately, conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and clinical symptoms do not necessarily correlate in the lumbar spine. With upright imaging, disc pathologies or foraminal stenosis may become more salient, leading to improvements in diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen adults (10 asymptomatic and 7 symptomatic volunteers) provided their informed consent and participated in the study. A 0.6T upright MRI scan was performed on each adult in the seated position. Parameters were obtained from the L2/3 level to the L5/S1 level including those pertaining to the foramen [cross-sectional area (CSA), height, mid-disc width, width, thickness of ligamentum flavum], disc (bulge, height, width), vertebral body (height and width), and alignment (lordosis angle, wedge angle, lumbosacral angle). Each parameter was compared based on the spinal level and volunteer group using two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA). Bonferroni post hoc analysis was used to assess the differences between individual spinal levels. RESULTS: Mid-disc width accounted for 56% of maximum foramen width in symptomatic volunteers and over 63% in asymptomatic volunteers. Disc bulge was 48% greater in symptomatic volunteers compared to asymptomatic volunteers. CSA was generally smaller in symptomatic volunteers compared to asymptomatic volunteers, particularly at the L4-L5 and L5-S1 spinal levels. Thickness of ligamentum flavum (TLF) generally increased from the cranial to caudal spinal levels where the L4-L5 and L5-S1 spinal levels were significantly thicker than the L1-L2 spinal level. CONCLUSIONS: The data implied that upright MRI could be a useful diagnostic option, as it can delineate pertinent differences between symptomatic volunteers and asymptomatic volunteers, especially with respect to foraminal geometry. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4790145/ /pubmed/27041883 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.176619 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nguyen, Ha Son
Doan, Ninh
Shabani, Saman
Baisden, Jamie
Wolfla, Christopher
Paskoff, Glenn
Shender, Barry
Stemper, Brian
Upright magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine: Back pain and radiculopathy
title Upright magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine: Back pain and radiculopathy
title_full Upright magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine: Back pain and radiculopathy
title_fullStr Upright magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine: Back pain and radiculopathy
title_full_unstemmed Upright magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine: Back pain and radiculopathy
title_short Upright magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine: Back pain and radiculopathy
title_sort upright magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine: back pain and radiculopathy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4790145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27041883
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.176619
work_keys_str_mv AT nguyenhason uprightmagneticresonanceimagingofthelumbarspinebackpainandradiculopathy
AT doanninh uprightmagneticresonanceimagingofthelumbarspinebackpainandradiculopathy
AT shabanisaman uprightmagneticresonanceimagingofthelumbarspinebackpainandradiculopathy
AT baisdenjamie uprightmagneticresonanceimagingofthelumbarspinebackpainandradiculopathy
AT wolflachristopher uprightmagneticresonanceimagingofthelumbarspinebackpainandradiculopathy
AT paskoffglenn uprightmagneticresonanceimagingofthelumbarspinebackpainandradiculopathy
AT shenderbarry uprightmagneticresonanceimagingofthelumbarspinebackpainandradiculopathy
AT stemperbrian uprightmagneticresonanceimagingofthelumbarspinebackpainandradiculopathy