Cargando…

Elaboration over a Discourse Facilitates Retrieval in Sentence Processing

Language comprehension requires access to stored knowledge and the ability to combine knowledge in new, meaningful ways. Previous work has shown that processing linguistically more complex expressions (‘Texas cattle rancher’ vs. ‘rancher’) leads to slow-downs in reading during initial processing, po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Troyer, Melissa, Hofmeister, Philip, Kutas, Marta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4791404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27014172
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00374
_version_ 1782421080853446656
author Troyer, Melissa
Hofmeister, Philip
Kutas, Marta
author_facet Troyer, Melissa
Hofmeister, Philip
Kutas, Marta
author_sort Troyer, Melissa
collection PubMed
description Language comprehension requires access to stored knowledge and the ability to combine knowledge in new, meaningful ways. Previous work has shown that processing linguistically more complex expressions (‘Texas cattle rancher’ vs. ‘rancher’) leads to slow-downs in reading during initial processing, possibly reflecting effort in combining information. Conversely, when this information must subsequently be retrieved (as in filler-gap constructions), processing is facilitated for more complex expressions, possibly because more semantic cues are available during retrieval. To follow up on this hypothesis, we tested whether information distributed across a short discourse can similarly provide effective cues for retrieval. Participants read texts introducing two referents (e.g., two senators), one of whom was described in greater detail than the other (e.g., ‘The Democrat had voted for one of the senators, and the Republican had voted for the other, a man from Ohio who was running for president’). The final sentence (e.g., ‘The senator who the {Republican/Democrat}had voted for…’) contained a relative clause picking out either the Many-Cue referent (with ‘Republican’) or the One-Cue referent (with ‘Democrat’). We predicted facilitated retrieval (faster reading times) for the Many-Cue condition at the verb region (‘had voted for’), where readers could understand that ‘The senator’ is the object of the verb. As predicted, this pattern was observed at the retrieval region and continued throughout the rest of the sentence. Participants also completed the Author/Magazine Recognition Tests (ART/MRT; Stanovich and West, 1989), providing a proxy for world knowledge. Since higher ART/MRT scores may index (a) greater experience accessing relevant knowledge and/or (b) richer/more highly structured representations in semantic memory, we predicted it would be positively associated with effects of elaboration on retrieval. We did not observe the predicted interaction between ART/MRT scores and Cue condition at the retrieval region, though ART/MRT interacted with Cue condition in other locations in the sentence. In sum, we found that providing more elaborative information over the course of a text can facilitate retrieval for referents, consistent with a framework in which referential elaboration over a discourse and not just local linguistic information directly impacts information retrieval during sentence processing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4791404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47914042016-03-24 Elaboration over a Discourse Facilitates Retrieval in Sentence Processing Troyer, Melissa Hofmeister, Philip Kutas, Marta Front Psychol Psychology Language comprehension requires access to stored knowledge and the ability to combine knowledge in new, meaningful ways. Previous work has shown that processing linguistically more complex expressions (‘Texas cattle rancher’ vs. ‘rancher’) leads to slow-downs in reading during initial processing, possibly reflecting effort in combining information. Conversely, when this information must subsequently be retrieved (as in filler-gap constructions), processing is facilitated for more complex expressions, possibly because more semantic cues are available during retrieval. To follow up on this hypothesis, we tested whether information distributed across a short discourse can similarly provide effective cues for retrieval. Participants read texts introducing two referents (e.g., two senators), one of whom was described in greater detail than the other (e.g., ‘The Democrat had voted for one of the senators, and the Republican had voted for the other, a man from Ohio who was running for president’). The final sentence (e.g., ‘The senator who the {Republican/Democrat}had voted for…’) contained a relative clause picking out either the Many-Cue referent (with ‘Republican’) or the One-Cue referent (with ‘Democrat’). We predicted facilitated retrieval (faster reading times) for the Many-Cue condition at the verb region (‘had voted for’), where readers could understand that ‘The senator’ is the object of the verb. As predicted, this pattern was observed at the retrieval region and continued throughout the rest of the sentence. Participants also completed the Author/Magazine Recognition Tests (ART/MRT; Stanovich and West, 1989), providing a proxy for world knowledge. Since higher ART/MRT scores may index (a) greater experience accessing relevant knowledge and/or (b) richer/more highly structured representations in semantic memory, we predicted it would be positively associated with effects of elaboration on retrieval. We did not observe the predicted interaction between ART/MRT scores and Cue condition at the retrieval region, though ART/MRT interacted with Cue condition in other locations in the sentence. In sum, we found that providing more elaborative information over the course of a text can facilitate retrieval for referents, consistent with a framework in which referential elaboration over a discourse and not just local linguistic information directly impacts information retrieval during sentence processing. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4791404/ /pubmed/27014172 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00374 Text en Copyright © 2016 Troyer, Hofmeister and Kutas. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Troyer, Melissa
Hofmeister, Philip
Kutas, Marta
Elaboration over a Discourse Facilitates Retrieval in Sentence Processing
title Elaboration over a Discourse Facilitates Retrieval in Sentence Processing
title_full Elaboration over a Discourse Facilitates Retrieval in Sentence Processing
title_fullStr Elaboration over a Discourse Facilitates Retrieval in Sentence Processing
title_full_unstemmed Elaboration over a Discourse Facilitates Retrieval in Sentence Processing
title_short Elaboration over a Discourse Facilitates Retrieval in Sentence Processing
title_sort elaboration over a discourse facilitates retrieval in sentence processing
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4791404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27014172
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00374
work_keys_str_mv AT troyermelissa elaborationoveradiscoursefacilitatesretrievalinsentenceprocessing
AT hofmeisterphilip elaborationoveradiscoursefacilitatesretrievalinsentenceprocessing
AT kutasmarta elaborationoveradiscoursefacilitatesretrievalinsentenceprocessing