Cargando…

The mathematical formula of the intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) distribution of lifelong premature ejaculation differs from the IELT distribution formula of men in the general male population

PURPOSE: To find the most accurate mathematical description of the intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) distribution in the general male population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared the fitness of various well-known mathematical distributions with the IELT distribution of two previously pu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janssen, Paddy K.C., Waldinger, Marcel D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Urological Association 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4791666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26981594
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2016.57.2.119
_version_ 1782421125489229824
author Janssen, Paddy K.C.
Waldinger, Marcel D.
author_facet Janssen, Paddy K.C.
Waldinger, Marcel D.
author_sort Janssen, Paddy K.C.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To find the most accurate mathematical description of the intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) distribution in the general male population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared the fitness of various well-known mathematical distributions with the IELT distribution of two previously published stopwatch studies of the Caucasian general male population and a stopwatch study of Dutch Caucasian men with lifelong premature ejaculation (PE). The accuracy of fitness is expressed by the Goodness of Fit (GOF). The smaller the GOF, the more accurate is the fitness. RESULTS: The 3 IELT distributions are gamma distributions, but the IELT distribution of lifelong PE is another gamma distribution than the IELT distribution of men in the general male population. The Lognormal distribution of the gamma distributions most accurately fits the IELT distribution of 965 men in the general population, with a GOF of 0.057. The Gumbel Max distribution most accurately fits the IELT distribution of 110 men with lifelong PE with a GOF of 0.179. There are more men with lifelong PE ejaculating within 30 and 60 seconds than can be extrapolated from the probability density curve of the Lognormal IELT distribution of men in the general population. CONCLUSIONS: Men with lifelong PE have a distinct IELT distribution, e.g., a Gumbel Max IELT distribution, that can only be retrieved from the general male population Lognormal IELT distribution when thousands of men would participate in a IELT stopwatch study. The mathematical formula of the Lognormal IELT distribution is useful for epidemiological research of the IELT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4791666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47916662016-03-15 The mathematical formula of the intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) distribution of lifelong premature ejaculation differs from the IELT distribution formula of men in the general male population Janssen, Paddy K.C. Waldinger, Marcel D. Investig Clin Urol Original Article PURPOSE: To find the most accurate mathematical description of the intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) distribution in the general male population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared the fitness of various well-known mathematical distributions with the IELT distribution of two previously published stopwatch studies of the Caucasian general male population and a stopwatch study of Dutch Caucasian men with lifelong premature ejaculation (PE). The accuracy of fitness is expressed by the Goodness of Fit (GOF). The smaller the GOF, the more accurate is the fitness. RESULTS: The 3 IELT distributions are gamma distributions, but the IELT distribution of lifelong PE is another gamma distribution than the IELT distribution of men in the general male population. The Lognormal distribution of the gamma distributions most accurately fits the IELT distribution of 965 men in the general population, with a GOF of 0.057. The Gumbel Max distribution most accurately fits the IELT distribution of 110 men with lifelong PE with a GOF of 0.179. There are more men with lifelong PE ejaculating within 30 and 60 seconds than can be extrapolated from the probability density curve of the Lognormal IELT distribution of men in the general population. CONCLUSIONS: Men with lifelong PE have a distinct IELT distribution, e.g., a Gumbel Max IELT distribution, that can only be retrieved from the general male population Lognormal IELT distribution when thousands of men would participate in a IELT stopwatch study. The mathematical formula of the Lognormal IELT distribution is useful for epidemiological research of the IELT. The Korean Urological Association 2016-03 2016-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4791666/ /pubmed/26981594 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2016.57.2.119 Text en © The Korean Urological Association, 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Janssen, Paddy K.C.
Waldinger, Marcel D.
The mathematical formula of the intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) distribution of lifelong premature ejaculation differs from the IELT distribution formula of men in the general male population
title The mathematical formula of the intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) distribution of lifelong premature ejaculation differs from the IELT distribution formula of men in the general male population
title_full The mathematical formula of the intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) distribution of lifelong premature ejaculation differs from the IELT distribution formula of men in the general male population
title_fullStr The mathematical formula of the intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) distribution of lifelong premature ejaculation differs from the IELT distribution formula of men in the general male population
title_full_unstemmed The mathematical formula of the intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) distribution of lifelong premature ejaculation differs from the IELT distribution formula of men in the general male population
title_short The mathematical formula of the intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) distribution of lifelong premature ejaculation differs from the IELT distribution formula of men in the general male population
title_sort mathematical formula of the intravaginal ejaculation latency time (ielt) distribution of lifelong premature ejaculation differs from the ielt distribution formula of men in the general male population
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4791666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26981594
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2016.57.2.119
work_keys_str_mv AT janssenpaddykc themathematicalformulaoftheintravaginalejaculationlatencytimeieltdistributionoflifelongprematureejaculationdiffersfromtheieltdistributionformulaofmeninthegeneralmalepopulation
AT waldingermarceld themathematicalformulaoftheintravaginalejaculationlatencytimeieltdistributionoflifelongprematureejaculationdiffersfromtheieltdistributionformulaofmeninthegeneralmalepopulation
AT janssenpaddykc mathematicalformulaoftheintravaginalejaculationlatencytimeieltdistributionoflifelongprematureejaculationdiffersfromtheieltdistributionformulaofmeninthegeneralmalepopulation
AT waldingermarceld mathematicalformulaoftheintravaginalejaculationlatencytimeieltdistributionoflifelongprematureejaculationdiffersfromtheieltdistributionformulaofmeninthegeneralmalepopulation