Cargando…

Prevention of sepsis prior to prostate biopsy

PURPOSE: Urosepsis is the most feared complication of transrectal prostate biopsy. The incidence may be increasing from <1% to 2%–3% in contemporary series. Historically, fluoroquinolones have been effective antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent infective complications but antibiotic resistance is in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toner, Liam, Bolton, Damien M, Lawrentschuk, Nathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Urological Association 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4791668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26981590
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2016.57.2.94
_version_ 1782421125961089024
author Toner, Liam
Bolton, Damien M
Lawrentschuk, Nathan
author_facet Toner, Liam
Bolton, Damien M
Lawrentschuk, Nathan
author_sort Toner, Liam
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Urosepsis is the most feared complication of transrectal prostate biopsy. The incidence may be increasing from <1% to 2%–3% in contemporary series. Historically, fluoroquinolones have been effective antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent infective complications but antibiotic resistance is increasing. The increase in antibiotic resistance may contribute to reported increases in urosepsis and hospitalization after transrectal biopsy. This article will review other methods clinicians may employ to reduce the incidence of infective complications after prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using literature databases PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE in August 2015 in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) criteria. RESULTS: Effective strategies to reduce infective complications after transrectal prostate biopsy include augmented prophylaxis with other antibiotics, rectal swab culture directed antibiotic prophylaxis or a transperineal biopsy approach. Needle disinfection, minimizing the number of biopsy needles and rectal disinfectants may also be of use. These methods may be of particular utility in patients with risk factors for developing urosepsis such as recent antibiotic use and overseas travel. CONCLUSIONS: The scientific literature describes various techniques designed to reduce infective complications caused by prostate biopsy. Clinicians should consider incorporating these novel techniques into their contemporary practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4791668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47916682016-03-15 Prevention of sepsis prior to prostate biopsy Toner, Liam Bolton, Damien M Lawrentschuk, Nathan Investig Clin Urol Special Article PURPOSE: Urosepsis is the most feared complication of transrectal prostate biopsy. The incidence may be increasing from <1% to 2%–3% in contemporary series. Historically, fluoroquinolones have been effective antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent infective complications but antibiotic resistance is increasing. The increase in antibiotic resistance may contribute to reported increases in urosepsis and hospitalization after transrectal biopsy. This article will review other methods clinicians may employ to reduce the incidence of infective complications after prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using literature databases PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE in August 2015 in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) criteria. RESULTS: Effective strategies to reduce infective complications after transrectal prostate biopsy include augmented prophylaxis with other antibiotics, rectal swab culture directed antibiotic prophylaxis or a transperineal biopsy approach. Needle disinfection, minimizing the number of biopsy needles and rectal disinfectants may also be of use. These methods may be of particular utility in patients with risk factors for developing urosepsis such as recent antibiotic use and overseas travel. CONCLUSIONS: The scientific literature describes various techniques designed to reduce infective complications caused by prostate biopsy. Clinicians should consider incorporating these novel techniques into their contemporary practice. The Korean Urological Association 2016-03 2016-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4791668/ /pubmed/26981590 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2016.57.2.94 Text en © The Korean Urological Association, 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Article
Toner, Liam
Bolton, Damien M
Lawrentschuk, Nathan
Prevention of sepsis prior to prostate biopsy
title Prevention of sepsis prior to prostate biopsy
title_full Prevention of sepsis prior to prostate biopsy
title_fullStr Prevention of sepsis prior to prostate biopsy
title_full_unstemmed Prevention of sepsis prior to prostate biopsy
title_short Prevention of sepsis prior to prostate biopsy
title_sort prevention of sepsis prior to prostate biopsy
topic Special Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4791668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26981590
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2016.57.2.94
work_keys_str_mv AT tonerliam preventionofsepsispriortoprostatebiopsy
AT boltondamienm preventionofsepsispriortoprostatebiopsy
AT lawrentschuknathan preventionofsepsispriortoprostatebiopsy