Cargando…

Contacting authors to retrieve individual patient data: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis is considered the “gold standard” for exploring the effectiveness of interventions in different subgroups of patients. However, obtaining IPD is time-consuming and contact with the researchers responsible for the original trials is usually requ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Veroniki, Areti Angeliki, Straus, Sharon E., Ashoor, Huda, Stewart, Lesley A., Clarke, Mike, Tricco, Andrea C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4791799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26975720
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1238-z
_version_ 1782421141480013824
author Veroniki, Areti Angeliki
Straus, Sharon E.
Ashoor, Huda
Stewart, Lesley A.
Clarke, Mike
Tricco, Andrea C.
author_facet Veroniki, Areti Angeliki
Straus, Sharon E.
Ashoor, Huda
Stewart, Lesley A.
Clarke, Mike
Tricco, Andrea C.
author_sort Veroniki, Areti Angeliki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis is considered the “gold standard” for exploring the effectiveness of interventions in different subgroups of patients. However, obtaining IPD is time-consuming and contact with the researchers responsible for the original trials is usually required. To date, there are no studies evaluating different strategies to optimize the process for retrieval of IPD from such researchers. Our aim is to examine the impact of providing incentives to the researchers responsible for the trials eligible for a meta-analysis to submit their IPD. METHODS/DESIGN: We updated our previously published systematic reviews for type 1 diabetes mellitus comparing long- and intermediate-acting insulin regimens (from January 2013 to June 2015) and for Alzheimer’s dementia comparing cognitive enhancers (from January 2015 to May 2015). Eligible were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) fulfilling the eligibility criteria of the systematic reviews. We will randomly allocate authors of the reports of these RCTs into an intervention or control group. Those allocated to the intervention group will be contacted by email, mail, and phone, and will be asked to provide the IPD from their RCT and will be given a financial incentive. Those allocated to the control group will be contacted by email, mail, and phone, but will not receive a financial incentive. Our primary outcome will be the proportion of authors who provide the IPD. The secondary outcomes will be the time to return the dataset (defined as the period between the information request and the authors’ response with the dataset), and completeness of data. We will compare the response rates in the two groups using the odds ratio and the corresponding 95 % confidence interval. We will also use binary logistic regression and cox regression analyses to examine whether different RCT characteristics, such as study size and sponsor information, influence the probability of providing IPD and the time needed to share the data. DISCUSSION: This study will determine whether a financial incentive affects response rates when seeking IPD from the original researchers. We will disseminate our findings in an open access scientific journal and present results at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered in Clinical Trials.gov, ID number NCT02569411. Date of registration 5 October 2015.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4791799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47917992016-03-16 Contacting authors to retrieve individual patient data: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Veroniki, Areti Angeliki Straus, Sharon E. Ashoor, Huda Stewart, Lesley A. Clarke, Mike Tricco, Andrea C. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis is considered the “gold standard” for exploring the effectiveness of interventions in different subgroups of patients. However, obtaining IPD is time-consuming and contact with the researchers responsible for the original trials is usually required. To date, there are no studies evaluating different strategies to optimize the process for retrieval of IPD from such researchers. Our aim is to examine the impact of providing incentives to the researchers responsible for the trials eligible for a meta-analysis to submit their IPD. METHODS/DESIGN: We updated our previously published systematic reviews for type 1 diabetes mellitus comparing long- and intermediate-acting insulin regimens (from January 2013 to June 2015) and for Alzheimer’s dementia comparing cognitive enhancers (from January 2015 to May 2015). Eligible were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) fulfilling the eligibility criteria of the systematic reviews. We will randomly allocate authors of the reports of these RCTs into an intervention or control group. Those allocated to the intervention group will be contacted by email, mail, and phone, and will be asked to provide the IPD from their RCT and will be given a financial incentive. Those allocated to the control group will be contacted by email, mail, and phone, but will not receive a financial incentive. Our primary outcome will be the proportion of authors who provide the IPD. The secondary outcomes will be the time to return the dataset (defined as the period between the information request and the authors’ response with the dataset), and completeness of data. We will compare the response rates in the two groups using the odds ratio and the corresponding 95 % confidence interval. We will also use binary logistic regression and cox regression analyses to examine whether different RCT characteristics, such as study size and sponsor information, influence the probability of providing IPD and the time needed to share the data. DISCUSSION: This study will determine whether a financial incentive affects response rates when seeking IPD from the original researchers. We will disseminate our findings in an open access scientific journal and present results at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered in Clinical Trials.gov, ID number NCT02569411. Date of registration 5 October 2015. BioMed Central 2016-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4791799/ /pubmed/26975720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1238-z Text en © Veroniki et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Veroniki, Areti Angeliki
Straus, Sharon E.
Ashoor, Huda
Stewart, Lesley A.
Clarke, Mike
Tricco, Andrea C.
Contacting authors to retrieve individual patient data: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Contacting authors to retrieve individual patient data: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Contacting authors to retrieve individual patient data: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Contacting authors to retrieve individual patient data: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Contacting authors to retrieve individual patient data: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Contacting authors to retrieve individual patient data: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort contacting authors to retrieve individual patient data: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4791799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26975720
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1238-z
work_keys_str_mv AT veronikiaretiangeliki contactingauthorstoretrieveindividualpatientdatastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT straussharone contactingauthorstoretrieveindividualpatientdatastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ashoorhuda contactingauthorstoretrieveindividualpatientdatastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT stewartlesleya contactingauthorstoretrieveindividualpatientdatastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT clarkemike contactingauthorstoretrieveindividualpatientdatastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT triccoandreac contactingauthorstoretrieveindividualpatientdatastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial