Cargando…

Barriers and facilitators related to implementation of regulated midwifery in Manitoba: a case study

BACKGROUND: In 2000, midwifery was regulated in the Canadian Province of Manitoba. Since the establishment of the midwifery program, little formal research has analyzed the utilization of regulated midwifery services. In Manitoba, the demand for midwifery services has exceeded the number of midwives...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thiessen, Kellie, Heaman, Maureen, Mignone, Javier, Martens, Patricia, Robinson, Kristine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4791836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26976610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1334-5
_version_ 1782421144719065088
author Thiessen, Kellie
Heaman, Maureen
Mignone, Javier
Martens, Patricia
Robinson, Kristine
author_facet Thiessen, Kellie
Heaman, Maureen
Mignone, Javier
Martens, Patricia
Robinson, Kristine
author_sort Thiessen, Kellie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2000, midwifery was regulated in the Canadian Province of Manitoba. Since the establishment of the midwifery program, little formal research has analyzed the utilization of regulated midwifery services. In Manitoba, the demand for midwifery services has exceeded the number of midwives in practice. The specific objective of this study was to explore factors influencing the implementation and utilization of regulated midwifery services in Manitoba. METHODS: The case study design incorporated qualitative exploratory descriptive methods, using data derived from two sources: interviews and public documents. Twenty-four key informants were purposefully selected to participate in semi-structured in-depth interviews. All documents analyzed were in the public domain. Content analysis was employed to analyze the documents and transcripts of the interviews. RESULTS: The results of the study were informed by the Behavioral Model of Health Services Use. Three main topic areas were explored: facilitators, barriers, and future strategies and recommendations. The most common themes arising under facilitators were funding of midwifery services and strategies to integrate the profession. Power and conflict, and lack of a productive education program emerged as the most prominent themes under barriers. Finally, future strategies for sustaining the midwifery profession focused on ensuring avenues for registration and education, improving management strategies and accountability frameworks within the employment model, enhancing the work environment, and evaluating both the practice and employment models. Results of the document analysis supported the themes arising from the interviews. CONCLUSION: These findings on factors that influenced the implementation and integration of midwifery in Manitoba may provide useful information to key stakeholders in Manitoba, as well as other provinces as they work toward successful implementation of regulated midwifery practice. Funding for new positions and programs was consistently noted as a successful strategy. While barriers such as structures of power within Regional Health Authorities and inter and intra-professional conflict were identified, the lack of a productive midwifery education program emerged as the most prominent barrier. This new knowledge highlights issues that impact the ongoing growth and capacity of the midwifery profession and suggests directions for ensuring its sustainability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4791836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47918362016-03-16 Barriers and facilitators related to implementation of regulated midwifery in Manitoba: a case study Thiessen, Kellie Heaman, Maureen Mignone, Javier Martens, Patricia Robinson, Kristine BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: In 2000, midwifery was regulated in the Canadian Province of Manitoba. Since the establishment of the midwifery program, little formal research has analyzed the utilization of regulated midwifery services. In Manitoba, the demand for midwifery services has exceeded the number of midwives in practice. The specific objective of this study was to explore factors influencing the implementation and utilization of regulated midwifery services in Manitoba. METHODS: The case study design incorporated qualitative exploratory descriptive methods, using data derived from two sources: interviews and public documents. Twenty-four key informants were purposefully selected to participate in semi-structured in-depth interviews. All documents analyzed were in the public domain. Content analysis was employed to analyze the documents and transcripts of the interviews. RESULTS: The results of the study were informed by the Behavioral Model of Health Services Use. Three main topic areas were explored: facilitators, barriers, and future strategies and recommendations. The most common themes arising under facilitators were funding of midwifery services and strategies to integrate the profession. Power and conflict, and lack of a productive education program emerged as the most prominent themes under barriers. Finally, future strategies for sustaining the midwifery profession focused on ensuring avenues for registration and education, improving management strategies and accountability frameworks within the employment model, enhancing the work environment, and evaluating both the practice and employment models. Results of the document analysis supported the themes arising from the interviews. CONCLUSION: These findings on factors that influenced the implementation and integration of midwifery in Manitoba may provide useful information to key stakeholders in Manitoba, as well as other provinces as they work toward successful implementation of regulated midwifery practice. Funding for new positions and programs was consistently noted as a successful strategy. While barriers such as structures of power within Regional Health Authorities and inter and intra-professional conflict were identified, the lack of a productive midwifery education program emerged as the most prominent barrier. This new knowledge highlights issues that impact the ongoing growth and capacity of the midwifery profession and suggests directions for ensuring its sustainability. BioMed Central 2016-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4791836/ /pubmed/26976610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1334-5 Text en © Thiessen et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Thiessen, Kellie
Heaman, Maureen
Mignone, Javier
Martens, Patricia
Robinson, Kristine
Barriers and facilitators related to implementation of regulated midwifery in Manitoba: a case study
title Barriers and facilitators related to implementation of regulated midwifery in Manitoba: a case study
title_full Barriers and facilitators related to implementation of regulated midwifery in Manitoba: a case study
title_fullStr Barriers and facilitators related to implementation of regulated midwifery in Manitoba: a case study
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and facilitators related to implementation of regulated midwifery in Manitoba: a case study
title_short Barriers and facilitators related to implementation of regulated midwifery in Manitoba: a case study
title_sort barriers and facilitators related to implementation of regulated midwifery in manitoba: a case study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4791836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26976610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1334-5
work_keys_str_mv AT thiessenkellie barriersandfacilitatorsrelatedtoimplementationofregulatedmidwiferyinmanitobaacasestudy
AT heamanmaureen barriersandfacilitatorsrelatedtoimplementationofregulatedmidwiferyinmanitobaacasestudy
AT mignonejavier barriersandfacilitatorsrelatedtoimplementationofregulatedmidwiferyinmanitobaacasestudy
AT martenspatricia barriersandfacilitatorsrelatedtoimplementationofregulatedmidwiferyinmanitobaacasestudy
AT robinsonkristine barriersandfacilitatorsrelatedtoimplementationofregulatedmidwiferyinmanitobaacasestudy