Cargando…
Barriers and facilitators related to implementation of regulated midwifery in Manitoba: a case study
BACKGROUND: In 2000, midwifery was regulated in the Canadian Province of Manitoba. Since the establishment of the midwifery program, little formal research has analyzed the utilization of regulated midwifery services. In Manitoba, the demand for midwifery services has exceeded the number of midwives...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4791836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26976610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1334-5 |
_version_ | 1782421144719065088 |
---|---|
author | Thiessen, Kellie Heaman, Maureen Mignone, Javier Martens, Patricia Robinson, Kristine |
author_facet | Thiessen, Kellie Heaman, Maureen Mignone, Javier Martens, Patricia Robinson, Kristine |
author_sort | Thiessen, Kellie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In 2000, midwifery was regulated in the Canadian Province of Manitoba. Since the establishment of the midwifery program, little formal research has analyzed the utilization of regulated midwifery services. In Manitoba, the demand for midwifery services has exceeded the number of midwives in practice. The specific objective of this study was to explore factors influencing the implementation and utilization of regulated midwifery services in Manitoba. METHODS: The case study design incorporated qualitative exploratory descriptive methods, using data derived from two sources: interviews and public documents. Twenty-four key informants were purposefully selected to participate in semi-structured in-depth interviews. All documents analyzed were in the public domain. Content analysis was employed to analyze the documents and transcripts of the interviews. RESULTS: The results of the study were informed by the Behavioral Model of Health Services Use. Three main topic areas were explored: facilitators, barriers, and future strategies and recommendations. The most common themes arising under facilitators were funding of midwifery services and strategies to integrate the profession. Power and conflict, and lack of a productive education program emerged as the most prominent themes under barriers. Finally, future strategies for sustaining the midwifery profession focused on ensuring avenues for registration and education, improving management strategies and accountability frameworks within the employment model, enhancing the work environment, and evaluating both the practice and employment models. Results of the document analysis supported the themes arising from the interviews. CONCLUSION: These findings on factors that influenced the implementation and integration of midwifery in Manitoba may provide useful information to key stakeholders in Manitoba, as well as other provinces as they work toward successful implementation of regulated midwifery practice. Funding for new positions and programs was consistently noted as a successful strategy. While barriers such as structures of power within Regional Health Authorities and inter and intra-professional conflict were identified, the lack of a productive midwifery education program emerged as the most prominent barrier. This new knowledge highlights issues that impact the ongoing growth and capacity of the midwifery profession and suggests directions for ensuring its sustainability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4791836 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47918362016-03-16 Barriers and facilitators related to implementation of regulated midwifery in Manitoba: a case study Thiessen, Kellie Heaman, Maureen Mignone, Javier Martens, Patricia Robinson, Kristine BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: In 2000, midwifery was regulated in the Canadian Province of Manitoba. Since the establishment of the midwifery program, little formal research has analyzed the utilization of regulated midwifery services. In Manitoba, the demand for midwifery services has exceeded the number of midwives in practice. The specific objective of this study was to explore factors influencing the implementation and utilization of regulated midwifery services in Manitoba. METHODS: The case study design incorporated qualitative exploratory descriptive methods, using data derived from two sources: interviews and public documents. Twenty-four key informants were purposefully selected to participate in semi-structured in-depth interviews. All documents analyzed were in the public domain. Content analysis was employed to analyze the documents and transcripts of the interviews. RESULTS: The results of the study were informed by the Behavioral Model of Health Services Use. Three main topic areas were explored: facilitators, barriers, and future strategies and recommendations. The most common themes arising under facilitators were funding of midwifery services and strategies to integrate the profession. Power and conflict, and lack of a productive education program emerged as the most prominent themes under barriers. Finally, future strategies for sustaining the midwifery profession focused on ensuring avenues for registration and education, improving management strategies and accountability frameworks within the employment model, enhancing the work environment, and evaluating both the practice and employment models. Results of the document analysis supported the themes arising from the interviews. CONCLUSION: These findings on factors that influenced the implementation and integration of midwifery in Manitoba may provide useful information to key stakeholders in Manitoba, as well as other provinces as they work toward successful implementation of regulated midwifery practice. Funding for new positions and programs was consistently noted as a successful strategy. While barriers such as structures of power within Regional Health Authorities and inter and intra-professional conflict were identified, the lack of a productive midwifery education program emerged as the most prominent barrier. This new knowledge highlights issues that impact the ongoing growth and capacity of the midwifery profession and suggests directions for ensuring its sustainability. BioMed Central 2016-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4791836/ /pubmed/26976610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1334-5 Text en © Thiessen et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Thiessen, Kellie Heaman, Maureen Mignone, Javier Martens, Patricia Robinson, Kristine Barriers and facilitators related to implementation of regulated midwifery in Manitoba: a case study |
title | Barriers and facilitators related to implementation of regulated midwifery in Manitoba: a case study |
title_full | Barriers and facilitators related to implementation of regulated midwifery in Manitoba: a case study |
title_fullStr | Barriers and facilitators related to implementation of regulated midwifery in Manitoba: a case study |
title_full_unstemmed | Barriers and facilitators related to implementation of regulated midwifery in Manitoba: a case study |
title_short | Barriers and facilitators related to implementation of regulated midwifery in Manitoba: a case study |
title_sort | barriers and facilitators related to implementation of regulated midwifery in manitoba: a case study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4791836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26976610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1334-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thiessenkellie barriersandfacilitatorsrelatedtoimplementationofregulatedmidwiferyinmanitobaacasestudy AT heamanmaureen barriersandfacilitatorsrelatedtoimplementationofregulatedmidwiferyinmanitobaacasestudy AT mignonejavier barriersandfacilitatorsrelatedtoimplementationofregulatedmidwiferyinmanitobaacasestudy AT martenspatricia barriersandfacilitatorsrelatedtoimplementationofregulatedmidwiferyinmanitobaacasestudy AT robinsonkristine barriersandfacilitatorsrelatedtoimplementationofregulatedmidwiferyinmanitobaacasestudy |