Cargando…

Basophil activation test: food challenge in a test tube or specialist research tool?

Oral food challenge (OFC) is the gold-standard to diagnose food allergy; however, it is a labour and resource-intensive procedure with the risk of causing an acute allergic reaction, which is potentially severe. Therefore, OFC are reserved for cases where the clinical history and the results of skin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santos, Alexandra F., Lack, Gideon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4791855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26981234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13601-016-0098-7
_version_ 1782421149071704064
author Santos, Alexandra F.
Lack, Gideon
author_facet Santos, Alexandra F.
Lack, Gideon
author_sort Santos, Alexandra F.
collection PubMed
description Oral food challenge (OFC) is the gold-standard to diagnose food allergy; however, it is a labour and resource-intensive procedure with the risk of causing an acute allergic reaction, which is potentially severe. Therefore, OFC are reserved for cases where the clinical history and the results of skin prick test and/or specific IgE do not confirm or exclude the diagnosis of food allergy. This is a significant proportion of patients seen in Allergy clinics and results in a high demand for OFC. The basophil activation test (BAT) has emerged as a new diagnostic test for food allergy. With high diagnostic accuracy, it can be particularly helpful in the cases where skin prick test and specific IgE are equivocal and may allow reducing the need for OFC. BAT has high specificity, which confers a high degree of certainty in confirming the diagnosis of food allergy and allows deferring the performance of OFC in patients with a positive BAT. The diagnostic utility of BAT is allergen-specific and needs to be validated for different allergens and in specific patient populations. Standardisation of the laboratory methodology and of the data analyses would help to enable a wider clinical application of BAT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4791855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47918552016-03-16 Basophil activation test: food challenge in a test tube or specialist research tool? Santos, Alexandra F. Lack, Gideon Clin Transl Allergy Review Oral food challenge (OFC) is the gold-standard to diagnose food allergy; however, it is a labour and resource-intensive procedure with the risk of causing an acute allergic reaction, which is potentially severe. Therefore, OFC are reserved for cases where the clinical history and the results of skin prick test and/or specific IgE do not confirm or exclude the diagnosis of food allergy. This is a significant proportion of patients seen in Allergy clinics and results in a high demand for OFC. The basophil activation test (BAT) has emerged as a new diagnostic test for food allergy. With high diagnostic accuracy, it can be particularly helpful in the cases where skin prick test and specific IgE are equivocal and may allow reducing the need for OFC. BAT has high specificity, which confers a high degree of certainty in confirming the diagnosis of food allergy and allows deferring the performance of OFC in patients with a positive BAT. The diagnostic utility of BAT is allergen-specific and needs to be validated for different allergens and in specific patient populations. Standardisation of the laboratory methodology and of the data analyses would help to enable a wider clinical application of BAT. BioMed Central 2016-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4791855/ /pubmed/26981234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13601-016-0098-7 Text en © Santos and Lack. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Santos, Alexandra F.
Lack, Gideon
Basophil activation test: food challenge in a test tube or specialist research tool?
title Basophil activation test: food challenge in a test tube or specialist research tool?
title_full Basophil activation test: food challenge in a test tube or specialist research tool?
title_fullStr Basophil activation test: food challenge in a test tube or specialist research tool?
title_full_unstemmed Basophil activation test: food challenge in a test tube or specialist research tool?
title_short Basophil activation test: food challenge in a test tube or specialist research tool?
title_sort basophil activation test: food challenge in a test tube or specialist research tool?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4791855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26981234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13601-016-0098-7
work_keys_str_mv AT santosalexandraf basophilactivationtestfoodchallengeinatesttubeorspecialistresearchtool
AT lackgideon basophilactivationtestfoodchallengeinatesttubeorspecialistresearchtool