Cargando…

Study protocol: developing a decision system for inclusive housing: applying a systematic, mixed-method quasi-experimental design

BACKGROUND: Identifying the housing preferences of people with complex disabilities is a much needed, but under-developed area of practice and scholarship. Despite the recognition that housing is a social determinant of health and quality of life, there is an absence of empirical methodologies that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zeeman, Heidi, Kendall, Elizabeth, Whitty, Jennifer A., Wright, Courtney J., Townsend, Clare, Smith, Dianne, Lakhani, Ali, Kennerley, Samantha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4791886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26975348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2936-x
_version_ 1782421156148543488
author Zeeman, Heidi
Kendall, Elizabeth
Whitty, Jennifer A.
Wright, Courtney J.
Townsend, Clare
Smith, Dianne
Lakhani, Ali
Kennerley, Samantha
author_facet Zeeman, Heidi
Kendall, Elizabeth
Whitty, Jennifer A.
Wright, Courtney J.
Townsend, Clare
Smith, Dianne
Lakhani, Ali
Kennerley, Samantha
author_sort Zeeman, Heidi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Identifying the housing preferences of people with complex disabilities is a much needed, but under-developed area of practice and scholarship. Despite the recognition that housing is a social determinant of health and quality of life, there is an absence of empirical methodologies that can practically and systematically involve consumers in this complex service delivery and housing design market. A rigorous process for making effective and consistent development decisions is needed to ensure resources are used effectively and the needs of consumers with complex disability are properly met. METHODS/DESIGN: This 3-year project aims to identify how the public and private housing market in Australia can better respond to the needs of people with complex disabilities whilst simultaneously achieving key corporate objectives. First, using the Customer Relationship Management framework, qualitative (Nominal Group Technique) and quantitative (Discrete Choice Experiment) methods will be used to quantify the housing preferences of consumers and their carers. A systematic mixed-method, quasi-experimental design will then be used to quantify the development priorities of other key stakeholders (e.g., architects, developers, Government housing services etc.) in relation to inclusive housing for people with complex disabilities. Stakeholders randomly assigned to Group 1 (experimental group) will participate in a series of focus groups employing Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) methodology. Stakeholders randomly assigned to Group 2 (control group) will participate in focus groups employing existing decision making processes to inclusive housing development (e.g., Risk, Opportunity, Cost, Benefit considerations). Using comparative stakeholder analysis, this research design will enable the AHP methodology (a proposed tool to guide inclusive housing development decisions) to be tested. DISCUSSION: It is anticipated that the findings of this study will enable stakeholders to incorporate consumer housing preferences into commercial decisions. Housing designers and developers will benefit from the creation of a parsimonious set of consumer-led housing preferences by which to make informed investments in future housing and contribute to future housing policy. The research design has not been applied in the Australian research context or elsewhere, and will provide a much needed blueprint for market investment to develop viable, consumer directed inclusive housing options for people with complex disability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4791886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47918862016-03-16 Study protocol: developing a decision system for inclusive housing: applying a systematic, mixed-method quasi-experimental design Zeeman, Heidi Kendall, Elizabeth Whitty, Jennifer A. Wright, Courtney J. Townsend, Clare Smith, Dianne Lakhani, Ali Kennerley, Samantha BMC Public Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Identifying the housing preferences of people with complex disabilities is a much needed, but under-developed area of practice and scholarship. Despite the recognition that housing is a social determinant of health and quality of life, there is an absence of empirical methodologies that can practically and systematically involve consumers in this complex service delivery and housing design market. A rigorous process for making effective and consistent development decisions is needed to ensure resources are used effectively and the needs of consumers with complex disability are properly met. METHODS/DESIGN: This 3-year project aims to identify how the public and private housing market in Australia can better respond to the needs of people with complex disabilities whilst simultaneously achieving key corporate objectives. First, using the Customer Relationship Management framework, qualitative (Nominal Group Technique) and quantitative (Discrete Choice Experiment) methods will be used to quantify the housing preferences of consumers and their carers. A systematic mixed-method, quasi-experimental design will then be used to quantify the development priorities of other key stakeholders (e.g., architects, developers, Government housing services etc.) in relation to inclusive housing for people with complex disabilities. Stakeholders randomly assigned to Group 1 (experimental group) will participate in a series of focus groups employing Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) methodology. Stakeholders randomly assigned to Group 2 (control group) will participate in focus groups employing existing decision making processes to inclusive housing development (e.g., Risk, Opportunity, Cost, Benefit considerations). Using comparative stakeholder analysis, this research design will enable the AHP methodology (a proposed tool to guide inclusive housing development decisions) to be tested. DISCUSSION: It is anticipated that the findings of this study will enable stakeholders to incorporate consumer housing preferences into commercial decisions. Housing designers and developers will benefit from the creation of a parsimonious set of consumer-led housing preferences by which to make informed investments in future housing and contribute to future housing policy. The research design has not been applied in the Australian research context or elsewhere, and will provide a much needed blueprint for market investment to develop viable, consumer directed inclusive housing options for people with complex disability. BioMed Central 2016-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4791886/ /pubmed/26975348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2936-x Text en © Zeeman et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Zeeman, Heidi
Kendall, Elizabeth
Whitty, Jennifer A.
Wright, Courtney J.
Townsend, Clare
Smith, Dianne
Lakhani, Ali
Kennerley, Samantha
Study protocol: developing a decision system for inclusive housing: applying a systematic, mixed-method quasi-experimental design
title Study protocol: developing a decision system for inclusive housing: applying a systematic, mixed-method quasi-experimental design
title_full Study protocol: developing a decision system for inclusive housing: applying a systematic, mixed-method quasi-experimental design
title_fullStr Study protocol: developing a decision system for inclusive housing: applying a systematic, mixed-method quasi-experimental design
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol: developing a decision system for inclusive housing: applying a systematic, mixed-method quasi-experimental design
title_short Study protocol: developing a decision system for inclusive housing: applying a systematic, mixed-method quasi-experimental design
title_sort study protocol: developing a decision system for inclusive housing: applying a systematic, mixed-method quasi-experimental design
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4791886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26975348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2936-x
work_keys_str_mv AT zeemanheidi studyprotocoldevelopingadecisionsystemforinclusivehousingapplyingasystematicmixedmethodquasiexperimentaldesign
AT kendallelizabeth studyprotocoldevelopingadecisionsystemforinclusivehousingapplyingasystematicmixedmethodquasiexperimentaldesign
AT whittyjennifera studyprotocoldevelopingadecisionsystemforinclusivehousingapplyingasystematicmixedmethodquasiexperimentaldesign
AT wrightcourtneyj studyprotocoldevelopingadecisionsystemforinclusivehousingapplyingasystematicmixedmethodquasiexperimentaldesign
AT townsendclare studyprotocoldevelopingadecisionsystemforinclusivehousingapplyingasystematicmixedmethodquasiexperimentaldesign
AT smithdianne studyprotocoldevelopingadecisionsystemforinclusivehousingapplyingasystematicmixedmethodquasiexperimentaldesign
AT lakhaniali studyprotocoldevelopingadecisionsystemforinclusivehousingapplyingasystematicmixedmethodquasiexperimentaldesign
AT kennerleysamantha studyprotocoldevelopingadecisionsystemforinclusivehousingapplyingasystematicmixedmethodquasiexperimentaldesign