Cargando…

Single-cell transcriptome analysis of endometrial tissue

STUDY QUESTION: How can we study the full transcriptome of endometrial stromal and epithelial cells at the single-cell level? SUMMARY ANSWER: By compiling and developing novel analytical tools for biopsy, tissue cryopreservation and disaggregation, single-cell sorting, library preparation, RNA seque...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krjutškov, K., Katayama, S., Saare, M., Vera-Rodriguez, M., Lubenets, D., Samuel, K., Laisk-Podar, T., Teder, H., Einarsdottir, E., Salumets, A., Kere, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4791917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26874359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew008
_version_ 1782421163343872000
author Krjutškov, K.
Katayama, S.
Saare, M.
Vera-Rodriguez, M.
Lubenets, D.
Samuel, K.
Laisk-Podar, T.
Teder, H.
Einarsdottir, E.
Salumets, A.
Kere, J.
author_facet Krjutškov, K.
Katayama, S.
Saare, M.
Vera-Rodriguez, M.
Lubenets, D.
Samuel, K.
Laisk-Podar, T.
Teder, H.
Einarsdottir, E.
Salumets, A.
Kere, J.
author_sort Krjutškov, K.
collection PubMed
description STUDY QUESTION: How can we study the full transcriptome of endometrial stromal and epithelial cells at the single-cell level? SUMMARY ANSWER: By compiling and developing novel analytical tools for biopsy, tissue cryopreservation and disaggregation, single-cell sorting, library preparation, RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and statistical data analysis. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Although single-cell transcriptome analyses from various biopsied tissues have been published recently, corresponding protocols for human endometrium have not been described. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The frozen-thawed endometrial biopsies were fluorescence-activated cell sorted (FACS) to distinguish CD13-positive stromal and CD9-positive epithelial cells and single-cell transcriptome analysis performed from biopsied tissues without culturing the cells. We studied gene transcription, applying a modern and efficient RNA-seq protocol. In parallel, endometrial stromal cells were cultured and global expression profiles were compared with uncultured cells. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: For method validation, we used two endometrial biopsies, one from mid-secretory phase (Day 21, LH+8) and another from late-secretory phase (Day 25). The samples underwent single-cell FACS sorting, single-cell RNA-seq library preparation and Illumina sequencing. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Here we present a complete pipeline for single-cell gene-expression studies, from clinical sampling to statistical data analysis. Tissue manipulation, starting from disaggregation and cell-type-specific labelling and ending with single-cell automated sorting, is managed within 90 min at low temperature to minimize changes in the gene expression profile. The single living stromal and epithelial cells were sorted using CD13- and CD9-specific antibodies, respectively. Of the 8622 detected genes, 2661 were more active in cultured stromal cells than in biopsy cells. In the comparison of biopsy versus cultured cells, 5603 commonly expressed genes were detected, with 241 significantly differentially expressed genes. Of these, 231 genes were up- and 10 down-regulated in cultured cells, respectively. In addition, we performed a gene ontology analysis of the differentially expressed genes and found that these genes are mainly related to cell cycle, translational processes and metabolism. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although CD9-positive single epithelial cells sorting was successfully established in our laboratory, the amount of transcriptome data per individual epithelial cell was low, complicating further analysis. This step most likely failed due to the high dose of RNases that are released by the cells' natural processes, or due to rapid turnaround time or the apoptotic conditions in freezing- or single-cell solutions. Since only the cells from the late-secretory phase were subject to more focused analysis, further studies including larger sample size from the different time-points of the natural menstrual cycle are needed. The methodology also needs further optimization to examine different cell types at high quality. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The symbiosis between clinical biopsy and the sophisticated laboratory and bioinformatic protocols described here brings together clinical diagnostic needs and modern laboratory and bioinformatic solutions, enabling us to implement a precise analytical toolbox for studying the endometrial tissue even at the single-cell level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4791917
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47919172016-03-16 Single-cell transcriptome analysis of endometrial tissue Krjutškov, K. Katayama, S. Saare, M. Vera-Rodriguez, M. Lubenets, D. Samuel, K. Laisk-Podar, T. Teder, H. Einarsdottir, E. Salumets, A. Kere, J. Hum Reprod Original Articles STUDY QUESTION: How can we study the full transcriptome of endometrial stromal and epithelial cells at the single-cell level? SUMMARY ANSWER: By compiling and developing novel analytical tools for biopsy, tissue cryopreservation and disaggregation, single-cell sorting, library preparation, RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and statistical data analysis. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Although single-cell transcriptome analyses from various biopsied tissues have been published recently, corresponding protocols for human endometrium have not been described. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The frozen-thawed endometrial biopsies were fluorescence-activated cell sorted (FACS) to distinguish CD13-positive stromal and CD9-positive epithelial cells and single-cell transcriptome analysis performed from biopsied tissues without culturing the cells. We studied gene transcription, applying a modern and efficient RNA-seq protocol. In parallel, endometrial stromal cells were cultured and global expression profiles were compared with uncultured cells. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: For method validation, we used two endometrial biopsies, one from mid-secretory phase (Day 21, LH+8) and another from late-secretory phase (Day 25). The samples underwent single-cell FACS sorting, single-cell RNA-seq library preparation and Illumina sequencing. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Here we present a complete pipeline for single-cell gene-expression studies, from clinical sampling to statistical data analysis. Tissue manipulation, starting from disaggregation and cell-type-specific labelling and ending with single-cell automated sorting, is managed within 90 min at low temperature to minimize changes in the gene expression profile. The single living stromal and epithelial cells were sorted using CD13- and CD9-specific antibodies, respectively. Of the 8622 detected genes, 2661 were more active in cultured stromal cells than in biopsy cells. In the comparison of biopsy versus cultured cells, 5603 commonly expressed genes were detected, with 241 significantly differentially expressed genes. Of these, 231 genes were up- and 10 down-regulated in cultured cells, respectively. In addition, we performed a gene ontology analysis of the differentially expressed genes and found that these genes are mainly related to cell cycle, translational processes and metabolism. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although CD9-positive single epithelial cells sorting was successfully established in our laboratory, the amount of transcriptome data per individual epithelial cell was low, complicating further analysis. This step most likely failed due to the high dose of RNases that are released by the cells' natural processes, or due to rapid turnaround time or the apoptotic conditions in freezing- or single-cell solutions. Since only the cells from the late-secretory phase were subject to more focused analysis, further studies including larger sample size from the different time-points of the natural menstrual cycle are needed. The methodology also needs further optimization to examine different cell types at high quality. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The symbiosis between clinical biopsy and the sophisticated laboratory and bioinformatic protocols described here brings together clinical diagnostic needs and modern laboratory and bioinformatic solutions, enabling us to implement a precise analytical toolbox for studying the endometrial tissue even at the single-cell level. Oxford University Press 2016-04 2016-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4791917/ /pubmed/26874359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew008 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Krjutškov, K.
Katayama, S.
Saare, M.
Vera-Rodriguez, M.
Lubenets, D.
Samuel, K.
Laisk-Podar, T.
Teder, H.
Einarsdottir, E.
Salumets, A.
Kere, J.
Single-cell transcriptome analysis of endometrial tissue
title Single-cell transcriptome analysis of endometrial tissue
title_full Single-cell transcriptome analysis of endometrial tissue
title_fullStr Single-cell transcriptome analysis of endometrial tissue
title_full_unstemmed Single-cell transcriptome analysis of endometrial tissue
title_short Single-cell transcriptome analysis of endometrial tissue
title_sort single-cell transcriptome analysis of endometrial tissue
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4791917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26874359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew008
work_keys_str_mv AT krjutskovk singlecelltranscriptomeanalysisofendometrialtissue
AT katayamas singlecelltranscriptomeanalysisofendometrialtissue
AT saarem singlecelltranscriptomeanalysisofendometrialtissue
AT verarodriguezm singlecelltranscriptomeanalysisofendometrialtissue
AT lubenetsd singlecelltranscriptomeanalysisofendometrialtissue
AT samuelk singlecelltranscriptomeanalysisofendometrialtissue
AT laiskpodart singlecelltranscriptomeanalysisofendometrialtissue
AT tederh singlecelltranscriptomeanalysisofendometrialtissue
AT einarsdottire singlecelltranscriptomeanalysisofendometrialtissue
AT salumetsa singlecelltranscriptomeanalysisofendometrialtissue
AT kerej singlecelltranscriptomeanalysisofendometrialtissue