Cargando…

Comparative experimental investigation on the efficacy of mono- and multiprobiotic strains in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease prevention

BACKGROUND: To investigate the efficacy of different probiotic strains, their combinations and forms (alive or lyophilized) in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) prevention. METHODS: In this study, 70 rats have been used divided into 7 groups of 10 animals in each: I – intact rats, II-VII – ra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kobyliak, Nazarii, Falalyeyeva, Tetyana, Virchenko, Oleksandr, Mykhalchyshyn, Galyna, Bodnar, Petro, Spivak, Mykola, Yankovsky, Dmytro, Beregova, Tetyana, Ostapchenko, Lyudmyla
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4791938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26976285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-016-0451-2
_version_ 1782421167525593088
author Kobyliak, Nazarii
Falalyeyeva, Tetyana
Virchenko, Oleksandr
Mykhalchyshyn, Galyna
Bodnar, Petro
Spivak, Mykola
Yankovsky, Dmytro
Beregova, Tetyana
Ostapchenko, Lyudmyla
author_facet Kobyliak, Nazarii
Falalyeyeva, Tetyana
Virchenko, Oleksandr
Mykhalchyshyn, Galyna
Bodnar, Petro
Spivak, Mykola
Yankovsky, Dmytro
Beregova, Tetyana
Ostapchenko, Lyudmyla
author_sort Kobyliak, Nazarii
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To investigate the efficacy of different probiotic strains, their combinations and forms (alive or lyophilized) in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) prevention. METHODS: In this study, 70 rats have been used divided into 7 groups of 10 animals in each: I – intact rats, II-VII – rats with monosodium glutamate (MSG)-induced NAFLD. Rats with NAFLD were untreated (group II, MSG-obesity group) and treated with probiotics (groups III–VII). In order to develop NAFLD, newborn rats of groups II–VII were injected with a solution of monosodium glutamate (MSG) (4 mg/g) subcutaneously (s.c.) at 2nd,4th, 6th, 8th,10th postnatal day. The groups III–V received lyophilized monoprobiotics B. animalis VKL, B. animalis VKB, L.casei IMVB-7280, respectively. The group VI received 2.5 ml/kg of an aqueous solution of a mixture of the three probiotic strains (2:1:1 Lactobacillus casei IMVB-7280, Bifidobacterium animalis VKL, Bifidobacterium animalis VKB) at a dose of 50 mg/kg (5 × 10(9) CFU/kg) (g) (intragastrically). The group VII was treated with multiprobiotic “Symbiter” containing biomass of 14 alive probiotic strains (Lactobacillus + Lactococcus (6 × 10(10) CFU/g), Bifidobacterium (1 × 10(10)/g), Propionibacterium (3 × 10(10)/g), Acetobacter (1 × 10(6)/g)) at a dose of 140 mg/kg (1.4 × 10(10) CFU/kg). The treatment with probiotics was started at the age of 1 month. There were 3 courses of treatment, each included 2-week administration and 2-week break. All parameters were measured in 4-month aged rats. RESULTS: Introduction of MSG during the neonatal period leads to the NAFLD development in the 4-months old rats. For steatosis degree there was no significant difference between MSG-obesity group and lyophilized monocomponent probiotics groups (III–V). The highest manifestation of steatosis was observed for B. animalis VKL group (2.0 ± 0.25) as compared to B. animalis VKB (1.70 ± 0.21) and L. casei IMVB-7280 (1.80 ± 0.20). The steatosis score changes between all monoprobiotics groups (III–V) were insignificant. Administration from birth of both alive (VII) and lyophilized (VI) probiotic mixture lead to a significant decrease by 69.5 % (p < 0.001) and 43.5 % (p < 0.025) of steatosis score respectively as compared to the MSG-obesity group (2.3 ± 0.21 %). For both alive and lyophilized probiotic mixtures, reduction of lobular inflammation was observed. These histological data were confirmed by the significant decrease of total lipids and triglycerides content in the liver approximately by 22–25 % in groups treated with probiotic mixtures (VI, VII) compared to the MSG-obesity group. CONCLUSION: We established failure of NAFLD prevention with lyophilized monoprobiotic strains and the efficacy of probiotic mixture with the preference of alive probiotic strains.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4791938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47919382016-03-16 Comparative experimental investigation on the efficacy of mono- and multiprobiotic strains in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease prevention Kobyliak, Nazarii Falalyeyeva, Tetyana Virchenko, Oleksandr Mykhalchyshyn, Galyna Bodnar, Petro Spivak, Mykola Yankovsky, Dmytro Beregova, Tetyana Ostapchenko, Lyudmyla BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: To investigate the efficacy of different probiotic strains, their combinations and forms (alive or lyophilized) in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) prevention. METHODS: In this study, 70 rats have been used divided into 7 groups of 10 animals in each: I – intact rats, II-VII – rats with monosodium glutamate (MSG)-induced NAFLD. Rats with NAFLD were untreated (group II, MSG-obesity group) and treated with probiotics (groups III–VII). In order to develop NAFLD, newborn rats of groups II–VII were injected with a solution of monosodium glutamate (MSG) (4 mg/g) subcutaneously (s.c.) at 2nd,4th, 6th, 8th,10th postnatal day. The groups III–V received lyophilized monoprobiotics B. animalis VKL, B. animalis VKB, L.casei IMVB-7280, respectively. The group VI received 2.5 ml/kg of an aqueous solution of a mixture of the three probiotic strains (2:1:1 Lactobacillus casei IMVB-7280, Bifidobacterium animalis VKL, Bifidobacterium animalis VKB) at a dose of 50 mg/kg (5 × 10(9) CFU/kg) (g) (intragastrically). The group VII was treated with multiprobiotic “Symbiter” containing biomass of 14 alive probiotic strains (Lactobacillus + Lactococcus (6 × 10(10) CFU/g), Bifidobacterium (1 × 10(10)/g), Propionibacterium (3 × 10(10)/g), Acetobacter (1 × 10(6)/g)) at a dose of 140 mg/kg (1.4 × 10(10) CFU/kg). The treatment with probiotics was started at the age of 1 month. There were 3 courses of treatment, each included 2-week administration and 2-week break. All parameters were measured in 4-month aged rats. RESULTS: Introduction of MSG during the neonatal period leads to the NAFLD development in the 4-months old rats. For steatosis degree there was no significant difference between MSG-obesity group and lyophilized monocomponent probiotics groups (III–V). The highest manifestation of steatosis was observed for B. animalis VKL group (2.0 ± 0.25) as compared to B. animalis VKB (1.70 ± 0.21) and L. casei IMVB-7280 (1.80 ± 0.20). The steatosis score changes between all monoprobiotics groups (III–V) were insignificant. Administration from birth of both alive (VII) and lyophilized (VI) probiotic mixture lead to a significant decrease by 69.5 % (p < 0.001) and 43.5 % (p < 0.025) of steatosis score respectively as compared to the MSG-obesity group (2.3 ± 0.21 %). For both alive and lyophilized probiotic mixtures, reduction of lobular inflammation was observed. These histological data were confirmed by the significant decrease of total lipids and triglycerides content in the liver approximately by 22–25 % in groups treated with probiotic mixtures (VI, VII) compared to the MSG-obesity group. CONCLUSION: We established failure of NAFLD prevention with lyophilized monoprobiotic strains and the efficacy of probiotic mixture with the preference of alive probiotic strains. BioMed Central 2016-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4791938/ /pubmed/26976285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-016-0451-2 Text en © Kobyliak et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kobyliak, Nazarii
Falalyeyeva, Tetyana
Virchenko, Oleksandr
Mykhalchyshyn, Galyna
Bodnar, Petro
Spivak, Mykola
Yankovsky, Dmytro
Beregova, Tetyana
Ostapchenko, Lyudmyla
Comparative experimental investigation on the efficacy of mono- and multiprobiotic strains in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease prevention
title Comparative experimental investigation on the efficacy of mono- and multiprobiotic strains in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease prevention
title_full Comparative experimental investigation on the efficacy of mono- and multiprobiotic strains in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease prevention
title_fullStr Comparative experimental investigation on the efficacy of mono- and multiprobiotic strains in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease prevention
title_full_unstemmed Comparative experimental investigation on the efficacy of mono- and multiprobiotic strains in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease prevention
title_short Comparative experimental investigation on the efficacy of mono- and multiprobiotic strains in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease prevention
title_sort comparative experimental investigation on the efficacy of mono- and multiprobiotic strains in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease prevention
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4791938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26976285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-016-0451-2
work_keys_str_mv AT kobyliaknazarii comparativeexperimentalinvestigationontheefficacyofmonoandmultiprobioticstrainsinnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseprevention
AT falalyeyevatetyana comparativeexperimentalinvestigationontheefficacyofmonoandmultiprobioticstrainsinnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseprevention
AT virchenkooleksandr comparativeexperimentalinvestigationontheefficacyofmonoandmultiprobioticstrainsinnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseprevention
AT mykhalchyshyngalyna comparativeexperimentalinvestigationontheefficacyofmonoandmultiprobioticstrainsinnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseprevention
AT bodnarpetro comparativeexperimentalinvestigationontheefficacyofmonoandmultiprobioticstrainsinnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseprevention
AT spivakmykola comparativeexperimentalinvestigationontheefficacyofmonoandmultiprobioticstrainsinnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseprevention
AT yankovskydmytro comparativeexperimentalinvestigationontheefficacyofmonoandmultiprobioticstrainsinnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseprevention
AT beregovatetyana comparativeexperimentalinvestigationontheefficacyofmonoandmultiprobioticstrainsinnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseprevention
AT ostapchenkolyudmyla comparativeexperimentalinvestigationontheefficacyofmonoandmultiprobioticstrainsinnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseprevention