Cargando…

Should Israel be concerned by the high proportion of medical care paid for privately: comments from a U.S. perspective

As a frequent visitor to Israel, I am keenly aware of the concerns of many Israelis that limits in government funding is forcing a high proportion of the country’s medical care to be paid by private sources. Frequently used statistics suggested that close to 40 % of health care is paid for by privat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Altman, Stuart
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4791941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26981233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13584-016-0068-5
_version_ 1782421168234430464
author Altman, Stuart
author_facet Altman, Stuart
author_sort Altman, Stuart
collection PubMed
description As a frequent visitor to Israel, I am keenly aware of the concerns of many Israelis that limits in government funding is forcing a high proportion of the country’s medical care to be paid by private sources. Frequently used statistics suggested that close to 40 % of health care is paid for by private funds and that this generates inequalities in terms of access to needed services. The results of a recent IJHPR paper by Engelcin-Nissan and Shmueli cast some doubts on these concerns although they do suggest some degree of inequality in access to needed care. The authors suggest that a better measure of the proportion of private uses of care is not 39 % but about 15 %. And that for some essential medical services it is much lower; in particular, it is less than 10 % for primary care. On the other hand, the study indicates that, in 2009, 15 % of hospitalizations had some private funding. Moreover, a related study has indicated that in 2014 60 % of surgeries were supported by private funds. The authors raise additional concerns that sicker individuals and those with higher income are more likely to use private financing. Whether this level of private spending and its concentration on sicker and higher income individuals violates the commitment of equity and fairness is up to the citizens of Israel. For those of us in the U.S. we only wish our level of inequality was so low. In making the decision on what Israel should do about its inequality it would be helpful to understand why individuals use private funding for services that are covered by the national health insurance system. And, most importantly does using a different source of funds (private versus public) impact on the health outcomes of the care involved. This issue is particularly relevant with respect to the very high use of private financing for surgeries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4791941
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47919412016-03-16 Should Israel be concerned by the high proportion of medical care paid for privately: comments from a U.S. perspective Altman, Stuart Isr J Health Policy Res Commentary As a frequent visitor to Israel, I am keenly aware of the concerns of many Israelis that limits in government funding is forcing a high proportion of the country’s medical care to be paid by private sources. Frequently used statistics suggested that close to 40 % of health care is paid for by private funds and that this generates inequalities in terms of access to needed services. The results of a recent IJHPR paper by Engelcin-Nissan and Shmueli cast some doubts on these concerns although they do suggest some degree of inequality in access to needed care. The authors suggest that a better measure of the proportion of private uses of care is not 39 % but about 15 %. And that for some essential medical services it is much lower; in particular, it is less than 10 % for primary care. On the other hand, the study indicates that, in 2009, 15 % of hospitalizations had some private funding. Moreover, a related study has indicated that in 2014 60 % of surgeries were supported by private funds. The authors raise additional concerns that sicker individuals and those with higher income are more likely to use private financing. Whether this level of private spending and its concentration on sicker and higher income individuals violates the commitment of equity and fairness is up to the citizens of Israel. For those of us in the U.S. we only wish our level of inequality was so low. In making the decision on what Israel should do about its inequality it would be helpful to understand why individuals use private funding for services that are covered by the national health insurance system. And, most importantly does using a different source of funds (private versus public) impact on the health outcomes of the care involved. This issue is particularly relevant with respect to the very high use of private financing for surgeries. BioMed Central 2016-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4791941/ /pubmed/26981233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13584-016-0068-5 Text en © Altman. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
Altman, Stuart
Should Israel be concerned by the high proportion of medical care paid for privately: comments from a U.S. perspective
title Should Israel be concerned by the high proportion of medical care paid for privately: comments from a U.S. perspective
title_full Should Israel be concerned by the high proportion of medical care paid for privately: comments from a U.S. perspective
title_fullStr Should Israel be concerned by the high proportion of medical care paid for privately: comments from a U.S. perspective
title_full_unstemmed Should Israel be concerned by the high proportion of medical care paid for privately: comments from a U.S. perspective
title_short Should Israel be concerned by the high proportion of medical care paid for privately: comments from a U.S. perspective
title_sort should israel be concerned by the high proportion of medical care paid for privately: comments from a u.s. perspective
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4791941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26981233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13584-016-0068-5
work_keys_str_mv AT altmanstuart shouldisraelbeconcernedbythehighproportionofmedicalcarepaidforprivatelycommentsfromausperspective