Cargando…

Effect of various chemical agents used in gingival retraction systems on smear layer: Scanning electron microscope study

BACKGROUND: Chemical agents used for gingival retraction affects the smear layer. AIM: To determine the effect of three different chemical agents used for gingival retraction systems on smear layer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four human premolars were prepared using air-rotor with air-water spray to rec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Lahoti, Krishna Shivraj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4792050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27041896
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.177104
_version_ 1782421186274131968
author Lahoti, Krishna Shivraj
author_facet Lahoti, Krishna Shivraj
author_sort Lahoti, Krishna Shivraj
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chemical agents used for gingival retraction affects the smear layer. AIM: To determine the effect of three different chemical agents used for gingival retraction systems on smear layer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four human premolars were prepared using air-rotor with air-water spray to receive full crown restoration. Three of them were treated with 21.3% aluminum chloride for 10 min, 0.05% oxymetazoline hydrochloride for 10 min, and expasyl for 2 min, respectively. One sample was left untreated. Then, the tooth specimens were rinsed with tap water to remove any residue of test materials. All the samples (treated and untreated) were processed by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Processed samples were examined under SEM at ×2400 to evaluate the effect of chemical agents on smear layer. RESULTS: SEM examination revealed that 0.05% oxymetazoline hydrochloride for 10 min produced no alteration to smear layer followed by minimum alteration by expasyl for 2 min and complete removal of smear layer with etching of dentin with 21.3% aluminum chloride for 10 min. CONCLUSION: 0.05% oxymetazoline hydrochloride and expasyl are kind to smear layer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4792050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47920502016-04-01 Effect of various chemical agents used in gingival retraction systems on smear layer: Scanning electron microscope study Lahoti, Krishna Shivraj Contemp Clin Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: Chemical agents used for gingival retraction affects the smear layer. AIM: To determine the effect of three different chemical agents used for gingival retraction systems on smear layer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four human premolars were prepared using air-rotor with air-water spray to receive full crown restoration. Three of them were treated with 21.3% aluminum chloride for 10 min, 0.05% oxymetazoline hydrochloride for 10 min, and expasyl for 2 min, respectively. One sample was left untreated. Then, the tooth specimens were rinsed with tap water to remove any residue of test materials. All the samples (treated and untreated) were processed by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Processed samples were examined under SEM at ×2400 to evaluate the effect of chemical agents on smear layer. RESULTS: SEM examination revealed that 0.05% oxymetazoline hydrochloride for 10 min produced no alteration to smear layer followed by minimum alteration by expasyl for 2 min and complete removal of smear layer with etching of dentin with 21.3% aluminum chloride for 10 min. CONCLUSION: 0.05% oxymetazoline hydrochloride and expasyl are kind to smear layer. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4792050/ /pubmed/27041896 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.177104 Text en Copyright: © Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lahoti, Krishna Shivraj
Effect of various chemical agents used in gingival retraction systems on smear layer: Scanning electron microscope study
title Effect of various chemical agents used in gingival retraction systems on smear layer: Scanning electron microscope study
title_full Effect of various chemical agents used in gingival retraction systems on smear layer: Scanning electron microscope study
title_fullStr Effect of various chemical agents used in gingival retraction systems on smear layer: Scanning electron microscope study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of various chemical agents used in gingival retraction systems on smear layer: Scanning electron microscope study
title_short Effect of various chemical agents used in gingival retraction systems on smear layer: Scanning electron microscope study
title_sort effect of various chemical agents used in gingival retraction systems on smear layer: scanning electron microscope study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4792050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27041896
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.177104
work_keys_str_mv AT lahotikrishnashivraj effectofvariouschemicalagentsusedingingivalretractionsystemsonsmearlayerscanningelectronmicroscopestudy