Cargando…
Effect of various chemical agents used in gingival retraction systems on smear layer: Scanning electron microscope study
BACKGROUND: Chemical agents used for gingival retraction affects the smear layer. AIM: To determine the effect of three different chemical agents used for gingival retraction systems on smear layer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four human premolars were prepared using air-rotor with air-water spray to rec...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4792050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27041896 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.177104 |
_version_ | 1782421186274131968 |
---|---|
author | Lahoti, Krishna Shivraj |
author_facet | Lahoti, Krishna Shivraj |
author_sort | Lahoti, Krishna Shivraj |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Chemical agents used for gingival retraction affects the smear layer. AIM: To determine the effect of three different chemical agents used for gingival retraction systems on smear layer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four human premolars were prepared using air-rotor with air-water spray to receive full crown restoration. Three of them were treated with 21.3% aluminum chloride for 10 min, 0.05% oxymetazoline hydrochloride for 10 min, and expasyl for 2 min, respectively. One sample was left untreated. Then, the tooth specimens were rinsed with tap water to remove any residue of test materials. All the samples (treated and untreated) were processed by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Processed samples were examined under SEM at ×2400 to evaluate the effect of chemical agents on smear layer. RESULTS: SEM examination revealed that 0.05% oxymetazoline hydrochloride for 10 min produced no alteration to smear layer followed by minimum alteration by expasyl for 2 min and complete removal of smear layer with etching of dentin with 21.3% aluminum chloride for 10 min. CONCLUSION: 0.05% oxymetazoline hydrochloride and expasyl are kind to smear layer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4792050 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47920502016-04-01 Effect of various chemical agents used in gingival retraction systems on smear layer: Scanning electron microscope study Lahoti, Krishna Shivraj Contemp Clin Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: Chemical agents used for gingival retraction affects the smear layer. AIM: To determine the effect of three different chemical agents used for gingival retraction systems on smear layer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four human premolars were prepared using air-rotor with air-water spray to receive full crown restoration. Three of them were treated with 21.3% aluminum chloride for 10 min, 0.05% oxymetazoline hydrochloride for 10 min, and expasyl for 2 min, respectively. One sample was left untreated. Then, the tooth specimens were rinsed with tap water to remove any residue of test materials. All the samples (treated and untreated) were processed by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Processed samples were examined under SEM at ×2400 to evaluate the effect of chemical agents on smear layer. RESULTS: SEM examination revealed that 0.05% oxymetazoline hydrochloride for 10 min produced no alteration to smear layer followed by minimum alteration by expasyl for 2 min and complete removal of smear layer with etching of dentin with 21.3% aluminum chloride for 10 min. CONCLUSION: 0.05% oxymetazoline hydrochloride and expasyl are kind to smear layer. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4792050/ /pubmed/27041896 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.177104 Text en Copyright: © Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lahoti, Krishna Shivraj Effect of various chemical agents used in gingival retraction systems on smear layer: Scanning electron microscope study |
title | Effect of various chemical agents used in gingival retraction systems on smear layer: Scanning electron microscope study |
title_full | Effect of various chemical agents used in gingival retraction systems on smear layer: Scanning electron microscope study |
title_fullStr | Effect of various chemical agents used in gingival retraction systems on smear layer: Scanning electron microscope study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of various chemical agents used in gingival retraction systems on smear layer: Scanning electron microscope study |
title_short | Effect of various chemical agents used in gingival retraction systems on smear layer: Scanning electron microscope study |
title_sort | effect of various chemical agents used in gingival retraction systems on smear layer: scanning electron microscope study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4792050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27041896 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.177104 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lahotikrishnashivraj effectofvariouschemicalagentsusedingingivalretractionsystemsonsmearlayerscanningelectronmicroscopestudy |