Cargando…

Sella size and jaw bases - Is there a correlation???

INTRODUCTION: Sella turcica is an important cephalometric structure and attempts have been made in the past to correlate its dimensions to the malocclusion. However, no study has so far compared the size of sella to the jaw bases that determine the type of malocclusion. The present study was underta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neha, Mogra, Subraya, Shetty, Vorvady Surendra, Shetty, Siddarth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4792058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27041903
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.177105
_version_ 1782421188099702784
author Neha,
Mogra, Subraya
Shetty, Vorvady Surendra
Shetty, Siddarth
author_facet Neha,
Mogra, Subraya
Shetty, Vorvady Surendra
Shetty, Siddarth
author_sort Neha,
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Sella turcica is an important cephalometric structure and attempts have been made in the past to correlate its dimensions to the malocclusion. However, no study has so far compared the size of sella to the jaw bases that determine the type of malocclusion. The present study was undertaken to find out any such correlation if it exists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lateral cephalograms of 110 adults consisting of 40 Class I, 40 Class II, and 30 Class III patients were assessed for the measurement of sella length, width, height, and area. The maxillary length, mandibular ramus height, and body length were also measured. The sella dimensions were compared among three malocclusion types by one-way ANOVA. Pearson correlation was calculated between the jaw size and sella dimensions. Furthermore, the ratio of jaw base lengths and sella area were calculated. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Mean sella length, width and area were found to be greatest in Class III, followed by Class I and least in Class II though the results were not statistically significant. 3 out of 4 measured dimensions of sella, correlated significantly with mandibular ramus and body length each. However, only one dimension of sella showed significant correlation with maxilla. The mandibular ramus and body length show a nearly constant ratio to sella area (0.83–0.85, 0.64–0.65, respectively) in all the three malocclusions. Thus, mandible has a definite and better correlation to the size of sella turcica.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4792058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47920582016-04-01 Sella size and jaw bases - Is there a correlation??? Neha, Mogra, Subraya Shetty, Vorvady Surendra Shetty, Siddarth Contemp Clin Dent Original Article INTRODUCTION: Sella turcica is an important cephalometric structure and attempts have been made in the past to correlate its dimensions to the malocclusion. However, no study has so far compared the size of sella to the jaw bases that determine the type of malocclusion. The present study was undertaken to find out any such correlation if it exists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lateral cephalograms of 110 adults consisting of 40 Class I, 40 Class II, and 30 Class III patients were assessed for the measurement of sella length, width, height, and area. The maxillary length, mandibular ramus height, and body length were also measured. The sella dimensions were compared among three malocclusion types by one-way ANOVA. Pearson correlation was calculated between the jaw size and sella dimensions. Furthermore, the ratio of jaw base lengths and sella area were calculated. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Mean sella length, width and area were found to be greatest in Class III, followed by Class I and least in Class II though the results were not statistically significant. 3 out of 4 measured dimensions of sella, correlated significantly with mandibular ramus and body length each. However, only one dimension of sella showed significant correlation with maxilla. The mandibular ramus and body length show a nearly constant ratio to sella area (0.83–0.85, 0.64–0.65, respectively) in all the three malocclusions. Thus, mandible has a definite and better correlation to the size of sella turcica. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4792058/ /pubmed/27041903 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.177105 Text en Copyright: © Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Neha,
Mogra, Subraya
Shetty, Vorvady Surendra
Shetty, Siddarth
Sella size and jaw bases - Is there a correlation???
title Sella size and jaw bases - Is there a correlation???
title_full Sella size and jaw bases - Is there a correlation???
title_fullStr Sella size and jaw bases - Is there a correlation???
title_full_unstemmed Sella size and jaw bases - Is there a correlation???
title_short Sella size and jaw bases - Is there a correlation???
title_sort sella size and jaw bases - is there a correlation???
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4792058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27041903
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.177105
work_keys_str_mv AT neha sellasizeandjawbasesisthereacorrelation
AT mograsubraya sellasizeandjawbasesisthereacorrelation
AT shettyvorvadysurendra sellasizeandjawbasesisthereacorrelation
AT shettysiddarth sellasizeandjawbasesisthereacorrelation