Cargando…
Sella size and jaw bases - Is there a correlation???
INTRODUCTION: Sella turcica is an important cephalometric structure and attempts have been made in the past to correlate its dimensions to the malocclusion. However, no study has so far compared the size of sella to the jaw bases that determine the type of malocclusion. The present study was underta...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4792058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27041903 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.177105 |
_version_ | 1782421188099702784 |
---|---|
author | Neha, Mogra, Subraya Shetty, Vorvady Surendra Shetty, Siddarth |
author_facet | Neha, Mogra, Subraya Shetty, Vorvady Surendra Shetty, Siddarth |
author_sort | Neha, |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Sella turcica is an important cephalometric structure and attempts have been made in the past to correlate its dimensions to the malocclusion. However, no study has so far compared the size of sella to the jaw bases that determine the type of malocclusion. The present study was undertaken to find out any such correlation if it exists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lateral cephalograms of 110 adults consisting of 40 Class I, 40 Class II, and 30 Class III patients were assessed for the measurement of sella length, width, height, and area. The maxillary length, mandibular ramus height, and body length were also measured. The sella dimensions were compared among three malocclusion types by one-way ANOVA. Pearson correlation was calculated between the jaw size and sella dimensions. Furthermore, the ratio of jaw base lengths and sella area were calculated. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Mean sella length, width and area were found to be greatest in Class III, followed by Class I and least in Class II though the results were not statistically significant. 3 out of 4 measured dimensions of sella, correlated significantly with mandibular ramus and body length each. However, only one dimension of sella showed significant correlation with maxilla. The mandibular ramus and body length show a nearly constant ratio to sella area (0.83–0.85, 0.64–0.65, respectively) in all the three malocclusions. Thus, mandible has a definite and better correlation to the size of sella turcica. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4792058 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47920582016-04-01 Sella size and jaw bases - Is there a correlation??? Neha, Mogra, Subraya Shetty, Vorvady Surendra Shetty, Siddarth Contemp Clin Dent Original Article INTRODUCTION: Sella turcica is an important cephalometric structure and attempts have been made in the past to correlate its dimensions to the malocclusion. However, no study has so far compared the size of sella to the jaw bases that determine the type of malocclusion. The present study was undertaken to find out any such correlation if it exists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lateral cephalograms of 110 adults consisting of 40 Class I, 40 Class II, and 30 Class III patients were assessed for the measurement of sella length, width, height, and area. The maxillary length, mandibular ramus height, and body length were also measured. The sella dimensions were compared among three malocclusion types by one-way ANOVA. Pearson correlation was calculated between the jaw size and sella dimensions. Furthermore, the ratio of jaw base lengths and sella area were calculated. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Mean sella length, width and area were found to be greatest in Class III, followed by Class I and least in Class II though the results were not statistically significant. 3 out of 4 measured dimensions of sella, correlated significantly with mandibular ramus and body length each. However, only one dimension of sella showed significant correlation with maxilla. The mandibular ramus and body length show a nearly constant ratio to sella area (0.83–0.85, 0.64–0.65, respectively) in all the three malocclusions. Thus, mandible has a definite and better correlation to the size of sella turcica. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4792058/ /pubmed/27041903 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.177105 Text en Copyright: © Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Neha, Mogra, Subraya Shetty, Vorvady Surendra Shetty, Siddarth Sella size and jaw bases - Is there a correlation??? |
title | Sella size and jaw bases - Is there a correlation??? |
title_full | Sella size and jaw bases - Is there a correlation??? |
title_fullStr | Sella size and jaw bases - Is there a correlation??? |
title_full_unstemmed | Sella size and jaw bases - Is there a correlation??? |
title_short | Sella size and jaw bases - Is there a correlation??? |
title_sort | sella size and jaw bases - is there a correlation??? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4792058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27041903 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.177105 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT neha sellasizeandjawbasesisthereacorrelation AT mograsubraya sellasizeandjawbasesisthereacorrelation AT shettyvorvadysurendra sellasizeandjawbasesisthereacorrelation AT shettysiddarth sellasizeandjawbasesisthereacorrelation |