Cargando…

On Sequence Learning Models: Open-loop Control Not Strictly Guided by Hick’s Law

According to the Hick’s law, reaction times increase linearly with the uncertainty of target stimuli. We tested the generality of this law by measuring reaction times in a human sequence learning protocol involving serial target locations which differed in transition probability and global entropy....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pavão, Rodrigo, Savietto, Joice P., Sato, João R., Xavier, Gilberto F., Helene, André F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4792158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26975409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep23018
_version_ 1782421201850728448
author Pavão, Rodrigo
Savietto, Joice P.
Sato, João R.
Xavier, Gilberto F.
Helene, André F.
author_facet Pavão, Rodrigo
Savietto, Joice P.
Sato, João R.
Xavier, Gilberto F.
Helene, André F.
author_sort Pavão, Rodrigo
collection PubMed
description According to the Hick’s law, reaction times increase linearly with the uncertainty of target stimuli. We tested the generality of this law by measuring reaction times in a human sequence learning protocol involving serial target locations which differed in transition probability and global entropy. Our results showed that sigmoid functions better describe the relationship between reaction times and uncertainty when compared to linear functions. Sequence predictability was estimated by distinct statistical predictors: conditional probability, conditional entropy, joint probability and joint entropy measures. Conditional predictors relate to closed-loop control models describing that performance is guided by on-line access to past sequence structure to predict next location. Differently, joint predictors relate to open-loop control models assuming global access of sequence structure, requiring no constant monitoring. We tested which of these predictors better describe performance on the sequence learning protocol. Results suggest that joint predictors are more accurate than conditional predictors to track performance. In conclusion, sequence learning is better described as an open-loop process which is not precisely predicted by Hick’s law.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4792158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47921582016-03-16 On Sequence Learning Models: Open-loop Control Not Strictly Guided by Hick’s Law Pavão, Rodrigo Savietto, Joice P. Sato, João R. Xavier, Gilberto F. Helene, André F. Sci Rep Article According to the Hick’s law, reaction times increase linearly with the uncertainty of target stimuli. We tested the generality of this law by measuring reaction times in a human sequence learning protocol involving serial target locations which differed in transition probability and global entropy. Our results showed that sigmoid functions better describe the relationship between reaction times and uncertainty when compared to linear functions. Sequence predictability was estimated by distinct statistical predictors: conditional probability, conditional entropy, joint probability and joint entropy measures. Conditional predictors relate to closed-loop control models describing that performance is guided by on-line access to past sequence structure to predict next location. Differently, joint predictors relate to open-loop control models assuming global access of sequence structure, requiring no constant monitoring. We tested which of these predictors better describe performance on the sequence learning protocol. Results suggest that joint predictors are more accurate than conditional predictors to track performance. In conclusion, sequence learning is better described as an open-loop process which is not precisely predicted by Hick’s law. Nature Publishing Group 2016-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4792158/ /pubmed/26975409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep23018 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Pavão, Rodrigo
Savietto, Joice P.
Sato, João R.
Xavier, Gilberto F.
Helene, André F.
On Sequence Learning Models: Open-loop Control Not Strictly Guided by Hick’s Law
title On Sequence Learning Models: Open-loop Control Not Strictly Guided by Hick’s Law
title_full On Sequence Learning Models: Open-loop Control Not Strictly Guided by Hick’s Law
title_fullStr On Sequence Learning Models: Open-loop Control Not Strictly Guided by Hick’s Law
title_full_unstemmed On Sequence Learning Models: Open-loop Control Not Strictly Guided by Hick’s Law
title_short On Sequence Learning Models: Open-loop Control Not Strictly Guided by Hick’s Law
title_sort on sequence learning models: open-loop control not strictly guided by hick’s law
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4792158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26975409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep23018
work_keys_str_mv AT pavaorodrigo onsequencelearningmodelsopenloopcontrolnotstrictlyguidedbyhickslaw
AT saviettojoicep onsequencelearningmodelsopenloopcontrolnotstrictlyguidedbyhickslaw
AT satojoaor onsequencelearningmodelsopenloopcontrolnotstrictlyguidedbyhickslaw
AT xaviergilbertof onsequencelearningmodelsopenloopcontrolnotstrictlyguidedbyhickslaw
AT heleneandref onsequencelearningmodelsopenloopcontrolnotstrictlyguidedbyhickslaw