Cargando…
On Sequence Learning Models: Open-loop Control Not Strictly Guided by Hick’s Law
According to the Hick’s law, reaction times increase linearly with the uncertainty of target stimuli. We tested the generality of this law by measuring reaction times in a human sequence learning protocol involving serial target locations which differed in transition probability and global entropy....
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4792158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26975409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep23018 |
_version_ | 1782421201850728448 |
---|---|
author | Pavão, Rodrigo Savietto, Joice P. Sato, João R. Xavier, Gilberto F. Helene, André F. |
author_facet | Pavão, Rodrigo Savietto, Joice P. Sato, João R. Xavier, Gilberto F. Helene, André F. |
author_sort | Pavão, Rodrigo |
collection | PubMed |
description | According to the Hick’s law, reaction times increase linearly with the uncertainty of target stimuli. We tested the generality of this law by measuring reaction times in a human sequence learning protocol involving serial target locations which differed in transition probability and global entropy. Our results showed that sigmoid functions better describe the relationship between reaction times and uncertainty when compared to linear functions. Sequence predictability was estimated by distinct statistical predictors: conditional probability, conditional entropy, joint probability and joint entropy measures. Conditional predictors relate to closed-loop control models describing that performance is guided by on-line access to past sequence structure to predict next location. Differently, joint predictors relate to open-loop control models assuming global access of sequence structure, requiring no constant monitoring. We tested which of these predictors better describe performance on the sequence learning protocol. Results suggest that joint predictors are more accurate than conditional predictors to track performance. In conclusion, sequence learning is better described as an open-loop process which is not precisely predicted by Hick’s law. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4792158 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47921582016-03-16 On Sequence Learning Models: Open-loop Control Not Strictly Guided by Hick’s Law Pavão, Rodrigo Savietto, Joice P. Sato, João R. Xavier, Gilberto F. Helene, André F. Sci Rep Article According to the Hick’s law, reaction times increase linearly with the uncertainty of target stimuli. We tested the generality of this law by measuring reaction times in a human sequence learning protocol involving serial target locations which differed in transition probability and global entropy. Our results showed that sigmoid functions better describe the relationship between reaction times and uncertainty when compared to linear functions. Sequence predictability was estimated by distinct statistical predictors: conditional probability, conditional entropy, joint probability and joint entropy measures. Conditional predictors relate to closed-loop control models describing that performance is guided by on-line access to past sequence structure to predict next location. Differently, joint predictors relate to open-loop control models assuming global access of sequence structure, requiring no constant monitoring. We tested which of these predictors better describe performance on the sequence learning protocol. Results suggest that joint predictors are more accurate than conditional predictors to track performance. In conclusion, sequence learning is better described as an open-loop process which is not precisely predicted by Hick’s law. Nature Publishing Group 2016-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4792158/ /pubmed/26975409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep23018 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Pavão, Rodrigo Savietto, Joice P. Sato, João R. Xavier, Gilberto F. Helene, André F. On Sequence Learning Models: Open-loop Control Not Strictly Guided by Hick’s Law |
title | On Sequence Learning Models: Open-loop Control Not Strictly Guided by Hick’s Law |
title_full | On Sequence Learning Models: Open-loop Control Not Strictly Guided by Hick’s Law |
title_fullStr | On Sequence Learning Models: Open-loop Control Not Strictly Guided by Hick’s Law |
title_full_unstemmed | On Sequence Learning Models: Open-loop Control Not Strictly Guided by Hick’s Law |
title_short | On Sequence Learning Models: Open-loop Control Not Strictly Guided by Hick’s Law |
title_sort | on sequence learning models: open-loop control not strictly guided by hick’s law |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4792158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26975409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep23018 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pavaorodrigo onsequencelearningmodelsopenloopcontrolnotstrictlyguidedbyhickslaw AT saviettojoicep onsequencelearningmodelsopenloopcontrolnotstrictlyguidedbyhickslaw AT satojoaor onsequencelearningmodelsopenloopcontrolnotstrictlyguidedbyhickslaw AT xaviergilbertof onsequencelearningmodelsopenloopcontrolnotstrictlyguidedbyhickslaw AT heleneandref onsequencelearningmodelsopenloopcontrolnotstrictlyguidedbyhickslaw |