Cargando…

Clinical Outcome of a Wide-diameter Bone-anchored Hearing Implant and a Surgical Technique With Tissue Preservation

To investigate the clinical outcome of a surgical technique with tissue preservation for a wide bone-anchored hearing implant concerning postoperative complications, skin reactions, implant loss, and implant stability. STUDY DESIGN: Consecutive, prospective case series. SETTING: Tertiary referral ce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mowinckel, Marius S., Møller, Martin N., Wielandt, Kirsten N., Foghsgaard, Søren
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4792196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26954348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000990
_version_ 1782421205695856640
author Mowinckel, Marius S.
Møller, Martin N.
Wielandt, Kirsten N.
Foghsgaard, Søren
author_facet Mowinckel, Marius S.
Møller, Martin N.
Wielandt, Kirsten N.
Foghsgaard, Søren
author_sort Mowinckel, Marius S.
collection PubMed
description To investigate the clinical outcome of a surgical technique with tissue preservation for a wide bone-anchored hearing implant concerning postoperative complications, skin reactions, implant loss, and implant stability. STUDY DESIGN: Consecutive, prospective case series. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Twenty-four adult patients with normal skin quality were enrolled. INTERVENTION(S): Implantation of bone-anchored implant was performed using a one-stage linear-incision technique with tissue preservation surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES(S): Skin and soft tissue reactions according to Holgers grading system. Pain and numbness measured according to visual analogue scale. Implant stability quotient values were recorded using resonance frequency analysis. Follow-up at 10 days, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: Primary implant stability was good and a significant increase in implant stability quotient occurred during the first 10 days and continued to be stable throughout the 1-year observation period. No implants were lost. Skin and soft tissue reactions were few, no reaction (Holger grade 0) was observed in 88% of the follow-up examinations and no grade 4 reactions occurred. Pain and numbness were minimal. CONCLUSION: The wide implant showed good stability initially and throughout the observation period. Skin and soft tissue reactions were rare and minor. No implants were lost.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4792196
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47921962016-04-05 Clinical Outcome of a Wide-diameter Bone-anchored Hearing Implant and a Surgical Technique With Tissue Preservation Mowinckel, Marius S. Møller, Martin N. Wielandt, Kirsten N. Foghsgaard, Søren Otol Neurotol Prosthetic Devices To investigate the clinical outcome of a surgical technique with tissue preservation for a wide bone-anchored hearing implant concerning postoperative complications, skin reactions, implant loss, and implant stability. STUDY DESIGN: Consecutive, prospective case series. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Twenty-four adult patients with normal skin quality were enrolled. INTERVENTION(S): Implantation of bone-anchored implant was performed using a one-stage linear-incision technique with tissue preservation surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES(S): Skin and soft tissue reactions according to Holgers grading system. Pain and numbness measured according to visual analogue scale. Implant stability quotient values were recorded using resonance frequency analysis. Follow-up at 10 days, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: Primary implant stability was good and a significant increase in implant stability quotient occurred during the first 10 days and continued to be stable throughout the 1-year observation period. No implants were lost. Skin and soft tissue reactions were few, no reaction (Holger grade 0) was observed in 88% of the follow-up examinations and no grade 4 reactions occurred. Pain and numbness were minimal. CONCLUSION: The wide implant showed good stability initially and throughout the observation period. Skin and soft tissue reactions were rare and minor. No implants were lost. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016-04 2016-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4792196/ /pubmed/26954348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000990 Text en Copyright © 2016 Otology & Neurotology, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0, where it is permissible to download, share and reproduce the work in any medium, provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle Prosthetic Devices
Mowinckel, Marius S.
Møller, Martin N.
Wielandt, Kirsten N.
Foghsgaard, Søren
Clinical Outcome of a Wide-diameter Bone-anchored Hearing Implant and a Surgical Technique With Tissue Preservation
title Clinical Outcome of a Wide-diameter Bone-anchored Hearing Implant and a Surgical Technique With Tissue Preservation
title_full Clinical Outcome of a Wide-diameter Bone-anchored Hearing Implant and a Surgical Technique With Tissue Preservation
title_fullStr Clinical Outcome of a Wide-diameter Bone-anchored Hearing Implant and a Surgical Technique With Tissue Preservation
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Outcome of a Wide-diameter Bone-anchored Hearing Implant and a Surgical Technique With Tissue Preservation
title_short Clinical Outcome of a Wide-diameter Bone-anchored Hearing Implant and a Surgical Technique With Tissue Preservation
title_sort clinical outcome of a wide-diameter bone-anchored hearing implant and a surgical technique with tissue preservation
topic Prosthetic Devices
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4792196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26954348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000990
work_keys_str_mv AT mowinckelmariuss clinicaloutcomeofawidediameterboneanchoredhearingimplantandasurgicaltechniquewithtissuepreservation
AT møllermartinn clinicaloutcomeofawidediameterboneanchoredhearingimplantandasurgicaltechniquewithtissuepreservation
AT wielandtkirstenn clinicaloutcomeofawidediameterboneanchoredhearingimplantandasurgicaltechniquewithtissuepreservation
AT foghsgaardsøren clinicaloutcomeofawidediameterboneanchoredhearingimplantandasurgicaltechniquewithtissuepreservation