Cargando…

The impact of communicating genetic risks of disease on risk-reducing health behaviour: systematic review with meta-analysis

Objective To assess the impact of communicating DNA based disease risk estimates on risk-reducing health behaviours and motivation to engage in such behaviours. Design Systematic review with meta-analysis, using Cochrane methods. Data sources Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Centr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hollands, Gareth J, French, David P, Griffin, Simon J, Prevost, A Toby, Sutton, Stephen, King, Sarah, Marteau, Theresa M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4793156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26979548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i1102
_version_ 1782421351345160192
author Hollands, Gareth J
French, David P
Griffin, Simon J
Prevost, A Toby
Sutton, Stephen
King, Sarah
Marteau, Theresa M
author_facet Hollands, Gareth J
French, David P
Griffin, Simon J
Prevost, A Toby
Sutton, Stephen
King, Sarah
Marteau, Theresa M
author_sort Hollands, Gareth J
collection PubMed
description Objective To assess the impact of communicating DNA based disease risk estimates on risk-reducing health behaviours and motivation to engage in such behaviours. Design Systematic review with meta-analysis, using Cochrane methods. Data sources Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to 25 February 2015. Backward and forward citation searches were also conducted. Study selection Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials involving adults in which one group received personalised DNA based estimates of disease risk for conditions where risk could be reduced by behaviour change. Eligible studies included a measure of risk-reducing behaviour. Results We examined 10 515 abstracts and included 18 studies that reported on seven behavioural outcomes, including smoking cessation (six studies; n=2663), diet (seven studies; n=1784), and physical activity (six studies; n=1704). Meta-analysis revealed no significant effects of communicating DNA based risk estimates on smoking cessation (odds ratio 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.63 to 1.35, P=0.67), diet (standardised mean difference 0.12, 95% confidence interval −0.00 to 0.24, P=0.05), or physical activity (standardised mean difference −0.03, 95% confidence interval −0.13 to 0.08, P=0.62). There were also no effects on any other behaviours (alcohol use, medication use, sun protection behaviours, and attendance at screening or behavioural support programmes) or on motivation to change behaviour, and no adverse effects, such as depression and anxiety. Subgroup analyses provided no clear evidence that communication of a risk-conferring genotype affected behaviour more than communication of the absence of such a genotype. However, studies were predominantly at high or unclear risk of bias, and evidence was typically of low quality. Conclusions Expectations that communicating DNA based risk estimates changes behaviour is not supported by existing evidence. These results do not support use of genetic testing or the search for risk-conferring gene variants for common complex diseases on the basis that they motivate risk-reducing behaviour. Systematic review registration This is a revised and updated version of a Cochrane review from 2010, adding 11 studies to the seven previously identified.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4793156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47931562016-03-29 The impact of communicating genetic risks of disease on risk-reducing health behaviour: systematic review with meta-analysis Hollands, Gareth J French, David P Griffin, Simon J Prevost, A Toby Sutton, Stephen King, Sarah Marteau, Theresa M BMJ Research Objective To assess the impact of communicating DNA based disease risk estimates on risk-reducing health behaviours and motivation to engage in such behaviours. Design Systematic review with meta-analysis, using Cochrane methods. Data sources Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to 25 February 2015. Backward and forward citation searches were also conducted. Study selection Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials involving adults in which one group received personalised DNA based estimates of disease risk for conditions where risk could be reduced by behaviour change. Eligible studies included a measure of risk-reducing behaviour. Results We examined 10 515 abstracts and included 18 studies that reported on seven behavioural outcomes, including smoking cessation (six studies; n=2663), diet (seven studies; n=1784), and physical activity (six studies; n=1704). Meta-analysis revealed no significant effects of communicating DNA based risk estimates on smoking cessation (odds ratio 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.63 to 1.35, P=0.67), diet (standardised mean difference 0.12, 95% confidence interval −0.00 to 0.24, P=0.05), or physical activity (standardised mean difference −0.03, 95% confidence interval −0.13 to 0.08, P=0.62). There were also no effects on any other behaviours (alcohol use, medication use, sun protection behaviours, and attendance at screening or behavioural support programmes) or on motivation to change behaviour, and no adverse effects, such as depression and anxiety. Subgroup analyses provided no clear evidence that communication of a risk-conferring genotype affected behaviour more than communication of the absence of such a genotype. However, studies were predominantly at high or unclear risk of bias, and evidence was typically of low quality. Conclusions Expectations that communicating DNA based risk estimates changes behaviour is not supported by existing evidence. These results do not support use of genetic testing or the search for risk-conferring gene variants for common complex diseases on the basis that they motivate risk-reducing behaviour. Systematic review registration This is a revised and updated version of a Cochrane review from 2010, adding 11 studies to the seven previously identified. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2016-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4793156/ /pubmed/26979548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i1102 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Hollands, Gareth J
French, David P
Griffin, Simon J
Prevost, A Toby
Sutton, Stephen
King, Sarah
Marteau, Theresa M
The impact of communicating genetic risks of disease on risk-reducing health behaviour: systematic review with meta-analysis
title The impact of communicating genetic risks of disease on risk-reducing health behaviour: systematic review with meta-analysis
title_full The impact of communicating genetic risks of disease on risk-reducing health behaviour: systematic review with meta-analysis
title_fullStr The impact of communicating genetic risks of disease on risk-reducing health behaviour: systematic review with meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The impact of communicating genetic risks of disease on risk-reducing health behaviour: systematic review with meta-analysis
title_short The impact of communicating genetic risks of disease on risk-reducing health behaviour: systematic review with meta-analysis
title_sort impact of communicating genetic risks of disease on risk-reducing health behaviour: systematic review with meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4793156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26979548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i1102
work_keys_str_mv AT hollandsgarethj theimpactofcommunicatinggeneticrisksofdiseaseonriskreducinghealthbehavioursystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT frenchdavidp theimpactofcommunicatinggeneticrisksofdiseaseonriskreducinghealthbehavioursystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT griffinsimonj theimpactofcommunicatinggeneticrisksofdiseaseonriskreducinghealthbehavioursystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT prevostatoby theimpactofcommunicatinggeneticrisksofdiseaseonriskreducinghealthbehavioursystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT suttonstephen theimpactofcommunicatinggeneticrisksofdiseaseonriskreducinghealthbehavioursystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT kingsarah theimpactofcommunicatinggeneticrisksofdiseaseonriskreducinghealthbehavioursystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT marteautheresam theimpactofcommunicatinggeneticrisksofdiseaseonriskreducinghealthbehavioursystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT hollandsgarethj impactofcommunicatinggeneticrisksofdiseaseonriskreducinghealthbehavioursystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT frenchdavidp impactofcommunicatinggeneticrisksofdiseaseonriskreducinghealthbehavioursystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT griffinsimonj impactofcommunicatinggeneticrisksofdiseaseonriskreducinghealthbehavioursystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT prevostatoby impactofcommunicatinggeneticrisksofdiseaseonriskreducinghealthbehavioursystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT suttonstephen impactofcommunicatinggeneticrisksofdiseaseonriskreducinghealthbehavioursystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT kingsarah impactofcommunicatinggeneticrisksofdiseaseonriskreducinghealthbehavioursystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT marteautheresam impactofcommunicatinggeneticrisksofdiseaseonriskreducinghealthbehavioursystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis