Cargando…

A comparison of no-slip, stress-free and inviscid models of rapidly rotating fluid in a spherical shell

We investigate how the choice of either no-slip or stress-free boundary conditions affects numerical models of rapidly rotating flow in Earth’s core by computing solutions of the weakly-viscous magnetostrophic equations within a spherical shell, driven by a prescribed body force. For non-axisymmetri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Livermore, Philip W., Bailey, Lewis M., Hollerbach, Rainer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4793234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26980289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep22812
_version_ 1782421367892738048
author Livermore, Philip W.
Bailey, Lewis M.
Hollerbach, Rainer
author_facet Livermore, Philip W.
Bailey, Lewis M.
Hollerbach, Rainer
author_sort Livermore, Philip W.
collection PubMed
description We investigate how the choice of either no-slip or stress-free boundary conditions affects numerical models of rapidly rotating flow in Earth’s core by computing solutions of the weakly-viscous magnetostrophic equations within a spherical shell, driven by a prescribed body force. For non-axisymmetric solutions, we show that models with either choice of boundary condition have thin boundary layers of depth E(1/2), where E is the Ekman number, and a free-stream flow that converges to the formally inviscid solution. At Earth-like values of viscosity, the boundary layer thickness is approximately 1 m, for either choice of condition. In contrast, the axisymmetric flows depend crucially on the choice of boundary condition, in both their structure and magnitude (either E(−1/2) or E(−1)). These very large zonal flows arise from requiring viscosity to balance residual axisymmetric torques. We demonstrate that switching the mechanical boundary conditions can cause a distinct change of structure of the flow, including a sign-change close to the equator, even at asymptotically low viscosity. Thus implementation of stress-free boundary conditions, compared with no-slip conditions, may yield qualitatively different dynamics in weakly-viscous magnetostrophic models of Earth’s core. We further show that convergence of the free-stream flow to its asymptotic structure requires E ≤ 10(−5).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4793234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47932342016-03-16 A comparison of no-slip, stress-free and inviscid models of rapidly rotating fluid in a spherical shell Livermore, Philip W. Bailey, Lewis M. Hollerbach, Rainer Sci Rep Article We investigate how the choice of either no-slip or stress-free boundary conditions affects numerical models of rapidly rotating flow in Earth’s core by computing solutions of the weakly-viscous magnetostrophic equations within a spherical shell, driven by a prescribed body force. For non-axisymmetric solutions, we show that models with either choice of boundary condition have thin boundary layers of depth E(1/2), where E is the Ekman number, and a free-stream flow that converges to the formally inviscid solution. At Earth-like values of viscosity, the boundary layer thickness is approximately 1 m, for either choice of condition. In contrast, the axisymmetric flows depend crucially on the choice of boundary condition, in both their structure and magnitude (either E(−1/2) or E(−1)). These very large zonal flows arise from requiring viscosity to balance residual axisymmetric torques. We demonstrate that switching the mechanical boundary conditions can cause a distinct change of structure of the flow, including a sign-change close to the equator, even at asymptotically low viscosity. Thus implementation of stress-free boundary conditions, compared with no-slip conditions, may yield qualitatively different dynamics in weakly-viscous magnetostrophic models of Earth’s core. We further show that convergence of the free-stream flow to its asymptotic structure requires E ≤ 10(−5). Nature Publishing Group 2016-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4793234/ /pubmed/26980289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep22812 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Livermore, Philip W.
Bailey, Lewis M.
Hollerbach, Rainer
A comparison of no-slip, stress-free and inviscid models of rapidly rotating fluid in a spherical shell
title A comparison of no-slip, stress-free and inviscid models of rapidly rotating fluid in a spherical shell
title_full A comparison of no-slip, stress-free and inviscid models of rapidly rotating fluid in a spherical shell
title_fullStr A comparison of no-slip, stress-free and inviscid models of rapidly rotating fluid in a spherical shell
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of no-slip, stress-free and inviscid models of rapidly rotating fluid in a spherical shell
title_short A comparison of no-slip, stress-free and inviscid models of rapidly rotating fluid in a spherical shell
title_sort comparison of no-slip, stress-free and inviscid models of rapidly rotating fluid in a spherical shell
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4793234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26980289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep22812
work_keys_str_mv AT livermorephilipw acomparisonofnoslipstressfreeandinviscidmodelsofrapidlyrotatingfluidinasphericalshell
AT baileylewism acomparisonofnoslipstressfreeandinviscidmodelsofrapidlyrotatingfluidinasphericalshell
AT hollerbachrainer acomparisonofnoslipstressfreeandinviscidmodelsofrapidlyrotatingfluidinasphericalshell
AT livermorephilipw comparisonofnoslipstressfreeandinviscidmodelsofrapidlyrotatingfluidinasphericalshell
AT baileylewism comparisonofnoslipstressfreeandinviscidmodelsofrapidlyrotatingfluidinasphericalshell
AT hollerbachrainer comparisonofnoslipstressfreeandinviscidmodelsofrapidlyrotatingfluidinasphericalshell