Cargando…

Reducing bias in population and landscape genetic inferences: the effects of sampling related individuals and multiple life stages

In population or landscape genetics studies, an unbiased sampling scheme is essential for generating accurate results, but logistics may lead to deviations from the sample design. Such deviations may come in the form of sampling multiple life stages. Presently, it is largely unknown what effect samp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peterman, William, Brocato, Emily R., Semlitsch, Raymond D., Eggert, Lori S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4793335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26989639
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1813
_version_ 1782421387616452608
author Peterman, William
Brocato, Emily R.
Semlitsch, Raymond D.
Eggert, Lori S.
author_facet Peterman, William
Brocato, Emily R.
Semlitsch, Raymond D.
Eggert, Lori S.
author_sort Peterman, William
collection PubMed
description In population or landscape genetics studies, an unbiased sampling scheme is essential for generating accurate results, but logistics may lead to deviations from the sample design. Such deviations may come in the form of sampling multiple life stages. Presently, it is largely unknown what effect sampling different life stages can have on population or landscape genetic inference, or how mixing life stages can affect the parameters being measured. Additionally, the removal of siblings from a data set is considered best-practice, but direct comparisons of inferences made with and without siblings are limited. In this study, we sampled embryos, larvae, and adult Ambystoma maculatum from five ponds in Missouri, and analyzed them at 15 microsatellite loci. We calculated allelic richness, heterozygosity and effective population sizes for each life stage at each pond and tested for genetic differentiation (F(ST) and D(C)) and isolation-by-distance (IBD) among ponds. We tested for differences in each of these measures between life stages, and in a pooled population of all life stages. All calculations were done with and without sibling pairs to assess the effect of sibling removal. We also assessed the effect of reducing the number of microsatellites used to make inference. No statistically significant differences were found among ponds or life stages for any of the population genetic measures, but patterns of IBD differed among life stages. There was significant IBD when using adult samples, but tests using embryos, larvae, or a combination of the three life stages were not significant. We found that increasing the ratio of larval or embryo samples in the analysis of genetic distance weakened the IBD relationship, and when using D(C), the IBD was no longer significant when larvae and embryos exceeded 60% of the population sample. Further, power to detect an IBD relationship was reduced when fewer microsatellites were used in the analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4793335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47933352016-03-17 Reducing bias in population and landscape genetic inferences: the effects of sampling related individuals and multiple life stages Peterman, William Brocato, Emily R. Semlitsch, Raymond D. Eggert, Lori S. PeerJ Conservation Biology In population or landscape genetics studies, an unbiased sampling scheme is essential for generating accurate results, but logistics may lead to deviations from the sample design. Such deviations may come in the form of sampling multiple life stages. Presently, it is largely unknown what effect sampling different life stages can have on population or landscape genetic inference, or how mixing life stages can affect the parameters being measured. Additionally, the removal of siblings from a data set is considered best-practice, but direct comparisons of inferences made with and without siblings are limited. In this study, we sampled embryos, larvae, and adult Ambystoma maculatum from five ponds in Missouri, and analyzed them at 15 microsatellite loci. We calculated allelic richness, heterozygosity and effective population sizes for each life stage at each pond and tested for genetic differentiation (F(ST) and D(C)) and isolation-by-distance (IBD) among ponds. We tested for differences in each of these measures between life stages, and in a pooled population of all life stages. All calculations were done with and without sibling pairs to assess the effect of sibling removal. We also assessed the effect of reducing the number of microsatellites used to make inference. No statistically significant differences were found among ponds or life stages for any of the population genetic measures, but patterns of IBD differed among life stages. There was significant IBD when using adult samples, but tests using embryos, larvae, or a combination of the three life stages were not significant. We found that increasing the ratio of larval or embryo samples in the analysis of genetic distance weakened the IBD relationship, and when using D(C), the IBD was no longer significant when larvae and embryos exceeded 60% of the population sample. Further, power to detect an IBD relationship was reduced when fewer microsatellites were used in the analysis. PeerJ Inc. 2016-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4793335/ /pubmed/26989639 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1813 Text en ©2016 Peterman et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Conservation Biology
Peterman, William
Brocato, Emily R.
Semlitsch, Raymond D.
Eggert, Lori S.
Reducing bias in population and landscape genetic inferences: the effects of sampling related individuals and multiple life stages
title Reducing bias in population and landscape genetic inferences: the effects of sampling related individuals and multiple life stages
title_full Reducing bias in population and landscape genetic inferences: the effects of sampling related individuals and multiple life stages
title_fullStr Reducing bias in population and landscape genetic inferences: the effects of sampling related individuals and multiple life stages
title_full_unstemmed Reducing bias in population and landscape genetic inferences: the effects of sampling related individuals and multiple life stages
title_short Reducing bias in population and landscape genetic inferences: the effects of sampling related individuals and multiple life stages
title_sort reducing bias in population and landscape genetic inferences: the effects of sampling related individuals and multiple life stages
topic Conservation Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4793335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26989639
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1813
work_keys_str_mv AT petermanwilliam reducingbiasinpopulationandlandscapegeneticinferencestheeffectsofsamplingrelatedindividualsandmultiplelifestages
AT brocatoemilyr reducingbiasinpopulationandlandscapegeneticinferencestheeffectsofsamplingrelatedindividualsandmultiplelifestages
AT semlitschraymondd reducingbiasinpopulationandlandscapegeneticinferencestheeffectsofsamplingrelatedindividualsandmultiplelifestages
AT eggertloris reducingbiasinpopulationandlandscapegeneticinferencestheeffectsofsamplingrelatedindividualsandmultiplelifestages