Cargando…

Evidence of surgical outcomes fluctuates over time: results from a cumulative meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis

BACKGROUND: In surgical trials, complex variables such as equipment development and surgeons’ learning curve are involved. The evidence obtained in these trials can thus fluctuate over time. We explored the stability of the evidence obtained during surgery by conducting a cumulative meta-analysis of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ukai, Tomohiko, Shikata, Satoru, Takeda, Hiromu, Dawes, Lauren, Noguchi, Yoshinori, Nakayama, Takeo, Takemura, Yousuke C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4793521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26979491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-016-0453-0
_version_ 1782421396096286720
author Ukai, Tomohiko
Shikata, Satoru
Takeda, Hiromu
Dawes, Lauren
Noguchi, Yoshinori
Nakayama, Takeo
Takemura, Yousuke C.
author_facet Ukai, Tomohiko
Shikata, Satoru
Takeda, Hiromu
Dawes, Lauren
Noguchi, Yoshinori
Nakayama, Takeo
Takemura, Yousuke C.
author_sort Ukai, Tomohiko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In surgical trials, complex variables such as equipment development and surgeons’ learning curve are involved. The evidence obtained in these trials can thus fluctuate over time. We explored the stability of the evidence obtained during surgery by conducting a cumulative meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for open and laparoscopic appendectomy. METHODS: We conducted a cumulative meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy for acute appendicitis, a topic with the greatest number of trials in the gastroenterological surgical field. We searched the MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and CINAHL databases up to September 2014 and reviewed the bibliographies. Outcomes were the incidence of intra-abdominal abscess, incidence of wound infection, operative time, and length of hospital stay. We used the 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) of effect size for the significance test. RESULTS: Sixty-four trials were included in this analysis. Of the 51 trials addressing intra-abdominal abscesses, our cumulative meta-analysis of trials published up to and including 2001 demonstrated statistical significance in favor of open appendectomy (cumulative odds ratio [OR] 2.35, 95 % CI 1.30–4.25). The effect size in favor of open procedures began to disappear after 2001, leading to an insignificant result with an overall cumulative OR of 1.32 (95 % CI 0.84–2.10) when laparoscopic appendectomy was compared with open appendectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence regarding treatment effectiveness changed over time, after treatment effectiveness became significant in trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Observing only the 95 % confidence interval of effect size from a meta-analysis may not provide conclusive results. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12876-016-0453-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4793521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47935212016-03-16 Evidence of surgical outcomes fluctuates over time: results from a cumulative meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis Ukai, Tomohiko Shikata, Satoru Takeda, Hiromu Dawes, Lauren Noguchi, Yoshinori Nakayama, Takeo Takemura, Yousuke C. BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: In surgical trials, complex variables such as equipment development and surgeons’ learning curve are involved. The evidence obtained in these trials can thus fluctuate over time. We explored the stability of the evidence obtained during surgery by conducting a cumulative meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for open and laparoscopic appendectomy. METHODS: We conducted a cumulative meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy for acute appendicitis, a topic with the greatest number of trials in the gastroenterological surgical field. We searched the MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and CINAHL databases up to September 2014 and reviewed the bibliographies. Outcomes were the incidence of intra-abdominal abscess, incidence of wound infection, operative time, and length of hospital stay. We used the 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) of effect size for the significance test. RESULTS: Sixty-four trials were included in this analysis. Of the 51 trials addressing intra-abdominal abscesses, our cumulative meta-analysis of trials published up to and including 2001 demonstrated statistical significance in favor of open appendectomy (cumulative odds ratio [OR] 2.35, 95 % CI 1.30–4.25). The effect size in favor of open procedures began to disappear after 2001, leading to an insignificant result with an overall cumulative OR of 1.32 (95 % CI 0.84–2.10) when laparoscopic appendectomy was compared with open appendectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence regarding treatment effectiveness changed over time, after treatment effectiveness became significant in trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Observing only the 95 % confidence interval of effect size from a meta-analysis may not provide conclusive results. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12876-016-0453-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4793521/ /pubmed/26979491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-016-0453-0 Text en © Ukai et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ukai, Tomohiko
Shikata, Satoru
Takeda, Hiromu
Dawes, Lauren
Noguchi, Yoshinori
Nakayama, Takeo
Takemura, Yousuke C.
Evidence of surgical outcomes fluctuates over time: results from a cumulative meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis
title Evidence of surgical outcomes fluctuates over time: results from a cumulative meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis
title_full Evidence of surgical outcomes fluctuates over time: results from a cumulative meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis
title_fullStr Evidence of surgical outcomes fluctuates over time: results from a cumulative meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis
title_full_unstemmed Evidence of surgical outcomes fluctuates over time: results from a cumulative meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis
title_short Evidence of surgical outcomes fluctuates over time: results from a cumulative meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis
title_sort evidence of surgical outcomes fluctuates over time: results from a cumulative meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4793521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26979491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-016-0453-0
work_keys_str_mv AT ukaitomohiko evidenceofsurgicaloutcomesfluctuatesovertimeresultsfromacumulativemetaanalysisoflaparoscopicversusopenappendectomyforacuteappendicitis
AT shikatasatoru evidenceofsurgicaloutcomesfluctuatesovertimeresultsfromacumulativemetaanalysisoflaparoscopicversusopenappendectomyforacuteappendicitis
AT takedahiromu evidenceofsurgicaloutcomesfluctuatesovertimeresultsfromacumulativemetaanalysisoflaparoscopicversusopenappendectomyforacuteappendicitis
AT daweslauren evidenceofsurgicaloutcomesfluctuatesovertimeresultsfromacumulativemetaanalysisoflaparoscopicversusopenappendectomyforacuteappendicitis
AT noguchiyoshinori evidenceofsurgicaloutcomesfluctuatesovertimeresultsfromacumulativemetaanalysisoflaparoscopicversusopenappendectomyforacuteappendicitis
AT nakayamatakeo evidenceofsurgicaloutcomesfluctuatesovertimeresultsfromacumulativemetaanalysisoflaparoscopicversusopenappendectomyforacuteappendicitis
AT takemurayousukec evidenceofsurgicaloutcomesfluctuatesovertimeresultsfromacumulativemetaanalysisoflaparoscopicversusopenappendectomyforacuteappendicitis