Cargando…
Reporting transparency: making the ethical mandate explicit
Improving the transparency and quality of reporting in biomedical research is considered ethically important; yet, this is often based on practical reasons such as the facilitation of peer review. Surprisingly, there has been little explicit discussion regarding the ethical obligations that underpin...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4793699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26979591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0587-5 |
_version_ | 1782421410378940416 |
---|---|
author | Nicholls, Stuart G. Langan, Sinéad M. Benchimol, Eric I. Moher, David |
author_facet | Nicholls, Stuart G. Langan, Sinéad M. Benchimol, Eric I. Moher, David |
author_sort | Nicholls, Stuart G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Improving the transparency and quality of reporting in biomedical research is considered ethically important; yet, this is often based on practical reasons such as the facilitation of peer review. Surprisingly, there has been little explicit discussion regarding the ethical obligations that underpin reporting guidelines. In this commentary, we suggest a number of ethical drivers for the improved reporting of research. These ethical drivers relate to researcher integrity as well as to the benefits derived from improved reporting such as the fair use of resources, minimizing risk of harms, and maximizing benefits. Despite their undoubted benefit to reporting completeness, questions remain regarding the extent to which reporting guidelines can influence processes beyond publication, including researcher integrity or the uptake of scientific research findings into policy or practice. Thus, we consider investigation on the effects of reporting guidelines an important step in providing evidence of their benefits. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4793699 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47936992016-03-17 Reporting transparency: making the ethical mandate explicit Nicholls, Stuart G. Langan, Sinéad M. Benchimol, Eric I. Moher, David BMC Med Commentary Improving the transparency and quality of reporting in biomedical research is considered ethically important; yet, this is often based on practical reasons such as the facilitation of peer review. Surprisingly, there has been little explicit discussion regarding the ethical obligations that underpin reporting guidelines. In this commentary, we suggest a number of ethical drivers for the improved reporting of research. These ethical drivers relate to researcher integrity as well as to the benefits derived from improved reporting such as the fair use of resources, minimizing risk of harms, and maximizing benefits. Despite their undoubted benefit to reporting completeness, questions remain regarding the extent to which reporting guidelines can influence processes beyond publication, including researcher integrity or the uptake of scientific research findings into policy or practice. Thus, we consider investigation on the effects of reporting guidelines an important step in providing evidence of their benefits. BioMed Central 2016-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4793699/ /pubmed/26979591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0587-5 Text en © Nicholls et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Nicholls, Stuart G. Langan, Sinéad M. Benchimol, Eric I. Moher, David Reporting transparency: making the ethical mandate explicit |
title | Reporting transparency: making the ethical mandate explicit |
title_full | Reporting transparency: making the ethical mandate explicit |
title_fullStr | Reporting transparency: making the ethical mandate explicit |
title_full_unstemmed | Reporting transparency: making the ethical mandate explicit |
title_short | Reporting transparency: making the ethical mandate explicit |
title_sort | reporting transparency: making the ethical mandate explicit |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4793699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26979591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0587-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nichollsstuartg reportingtransparencymakingtheethicalmandateexplicit AT langansineadm reportingtransparencymakingtheethicalmandateexplicit AT benchimolerici reportingtransparencymakingtheethicalmandateexplicit AT moherdavid reportingtransparencymakingtheethicalmandateexplicit |