Cargando…

Improving stand-to-sit maneuver for individuals with spinal cord injury

BACKGROUND: Users of neuroprostheses employing electrical stimulation (ES) generally complete the stand-to-sit (STS) maneuver with high knee angular velocities, increased upper limb support forces, and high peak impact forces at initial contact with the chair. Controlling the knee during STS descent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Sarah R., Nandor, Mark J., Kobetic, Rudi, Foglyano, Kevin M., Quinn, Roger D., Triolo, Ronald J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4793745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26979386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-016-0137-6
_version_ 1782421415008403456
author Chang, Sarah R.
Nandor, Mark J.
Kobetic, Rudi
Foglyano, Kevin M.
Quinn, Roger D.
Triolo, Ronald J.
author_facet Chang, Sarah R.
Nandor, Mark J.
Kobetic, Rudi
Foglyano, Kevin M.
Quinn, Roger D.
Triolo, Ronald J.
author_sort Chang, Sarah R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Users of neuroprostheses employing electrical stimulation (ES) generally complete the stand-to-sit (STS) maneuver with high knee angular velocities, increased upper limb support forces, and high peak impact forces at initial contact with the chair. Controlling the knee during STS descent is challenging in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) due to the decreasing joint moment available with increased knee angle in response to ES. METHODS: The goal of this study was to investigate the effects of incorporating either (1) a coupling mechanism that coordinates hip and knee flexion or (2) a mechanism that damps knee motion to keep the knee angular velocity constant during the STS transition. The coupling and damping were achieved by hydraulic orthotic mechanisms. Two subjects with SCI were enrolled and each served as their own controls when characterizing the performance of each mechanism during STS as compared to stimulation alone. Outcome measures such as hip-knee angle, knee angular velocity, upper limb support force, and impact force were analyzed to determine the effectiveness of the two mechanisms in providing controlled STS. RESULTS: The coordination between the hip and knee joints improved with each orthotic mechanism. The damping and hip-knee coupling mechanisms caused the hip and knee joint ratios of 1:1.1 and 1:0.99, respectively, which approached the 1:1 coordination ratio observed in nondisabled individuals during STS maneuver. The knee damping mechanism provided lower (p < 0.001) and a more constant knee angular velocity than the hip-knee coupling mechanism over the knee range of motion. Both the coupling and damping mechanisms were similarly effective at reducing upper limb support forces by 70 % (p < 0.001) and impact force by half (p ≤ 0.001) as compared to sitting down with stimulation alone. CONCLUSIONS: Orthoses imposing simple kinematic constraints, such as 1:1 hip-knee coupling or knee damping, can normalize upper limb support forces, peak knee angular velocity, and peak impact force during the STS maneuvers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4793745
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47937452016-03-17 Improving stand-to-sit maneuver for individuals with spinal cord injury Chang, Sarah R. Nandor, Mark J. Kobetic, Rudi Foglyano, Kevin M. Quinn, Roger D. Triolo, Ronald J. J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Users of neuroprostheses employing electrical stimulation (ES) generally complete the stand-to-sit (STS) maneuver with high knee angular velocities, increased upper limb support forces, and high peak impact forces at initial contact with the chair. Controlling the knee during STS descent is challenging in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) due to the decreasing joint moment available with increased knee angle in response to ES. METHODS: The goal of this study was to investigate the effects of incorporating either (1) a coupling mechanism that coordinates hip and knee flexion or (2) a mechanism that damps knee motion to keep the knee angular velocity constant during the STS transition. The coupling and damping were achieved by hydraulic orthotic mechanisms. Two subjects with SCI were enrolled and each served as their own controls when characterizing the performance of each mechanism during STS as compared to stimulation alone. Outcome measures such as hip-knee angle, knee angular velocity, upper limb support force, and impact force were analyzed to determine the effectiveness of the two mechanisms in providing controlled STS. RESULTS: The coordination between the hip and knee joints improved with each orthotic mechanism. The damping and hip-knee coupling mechanisms caused the hip and knee joint ratios of 1:1.1 and 1:0.99, respectively, which approached the 1:1 coordination ratio observed in nondisabled individuals during STS maneuver. The knee damping mechanism provided lower (p < 0.001) and a more constant knee angular velocity than the hip-knee coupling mechanism over the knee range of motion. Both the coupling and damping mechanisms were similarly effective at reducing upper limb support forces by 70 % (p < 0.001) and impact force by half (p ≤ 0.001) as compared to sitting down with stimulation alone. CONCLUSIONS: Orthoses imposing simple kinematic constraints, such as 1:1 hip-knee coupling or knee damping, can normalize upper limb support forces, peak knee angular velocity, and peak impact force during the STS maneuvers. BioMed Central 2016-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4793745/ /pubmed/26979386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-016-0137-6 Text en © Chang et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Chang, Sarah R.
Nandor, Mark J.
Kobetic, Rudi
Foglyano, Kevin M.
Quinn, Roger D.
Triolo, Ronald J.
Improving stand-to-sit maneuver for individuals with spinal cord injury
title Improving stand-to-sit maneuver for individuals with spinal cord injury
title_full Improving stand-to-sit maneuver for individuals with spinal cord injury
title_fullStr Improving stand-to-sit maneuver for individuals with spinal cord injury
title_full_unstemmed Improving stand-to-sit maneuver for individuals with spinal cord injury
title_short Improving stand-to-sit maneuver for individuals with spinal cord injury
title_sort improving stand-to-sit maneuver for individuals with spinal cord injury
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4793745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26979386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-016-0137-6
work_keys_str_mv AT changsarahr improvingstandtositmaneuverforindividualswithspinalcordinjury
AT nandormarkj improvingstandtositmaneuverforindividualswithspinalcordinjury
AT kobeticrudi improvingstandtositmaneuverforindividualswithspinalcordinjury
AT foglyanokevinm improvingstandtositmaneuverforindividualswithspinalcordinjury
AT quinnrogerd improvingstandtositmaneuverforindividualswithspinalcordinjury
AT trioloronaldj improvingstandtositmaneuverforindividualswithspinalcordinjury