Cargando…
A 48-week randomized phase 2b study evaluating cenicriviroc versus efavirenz in treatment-naive HIV-infected adults with C-C chemokine receptor type 5-tropic virus
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, safety, and anti-inflammatory effects of cenicriviroc (CVC), an oral, once-daily C-C chemokine receptor types 5 and 2 antagonist, with those of efavirenz (EFV) in treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected adults. DESIGN: A 48-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy pha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4794136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26636929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000000988 |
_version_ | 1782421438267916288 |
---|---|
author | Thompson, Melanie Saag, Michael DeJesus, Edwin Gathe, Joseph Lalezari, Jay Landay, Alan L. Cade, Jerry Enejosa, Jeffrey Lefebvre, Eric Feinberg, Judith |
author_facet | Thompson, Melanie Saag, Michael DeJesus, Edwin Gathe, Joseph Lalezari, Jay Landay, Alan L. Cade, Jerry Enejosa, Jeffrey Lefebvre, Eric Feinberg, Judith |
author_sort | Thompson, Melanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, safety, and anti-inflammatory effects of cenicriviroc (CVC), an oral, once-daily C-C chemokine receptor types 5 and 2 antagonist, with those of efavirenz (EFV) in treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected adults. DESIGN: A 48-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy phase 2b trial at 43 institutions (USA and Puerto Rico). METHODS: Study participants (HIV-1 RNA ≥1000 copies/ml, CD4(+) cell count ≥200 cells/μl, C-C chemokine receptor type 5-tropic virus) were randomized 2 : 2 : 1 to CVC 100 mg (CVC100), CVC 200 mg (CVC200), or EFV 600 mg, each administered with emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Key end points were virologic success (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml) at week 24 (primary) and week 48 (secondary), safety/tolerability at weeks 24 and 48. Study sites and patients remained blinded until week 48. RESULTS: A total of 143 patients were randomized (CVC100, n = 59; CVC200, n = 56; EFV, n = 28). Virologic success was obtained at week 24 in 76, 73, and 71% of study participants for CVC100, CVC200, and EFV, respectively (all P > 0.05 versus EFV), and at week 48 in 68, 64, and 50%, respectively (all P > 0.05 versus EFV). Resistance mutations emerged in five and zero CVC and EFV-treated study participants, respectively. Virologic nonresponse and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance decreased when CVC minimum plasma concentration was at least 47.8 ng/ml. Treatment-related adverse events of at least grade 2 and discontinuations because of adverse events were less frequent in CVC-treated study participants. Total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased with CVC, but increased with EFV. C-C chemokine ligand type 2 (CCL2) (aka monocyte chemotactic protein-1) increased in a dose-dependent manner, whereas soluble CD14 levels decreased with CVC. CONCLUSION: CVC showed efficacy and favorable safety in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected study participants, supporting selection of CVC200 for phase 3 studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01338883. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4794136 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47941362016-04-05 A 48-week randomized phase 2b study evaluating cenicriviroc versus efavirenz in treatment-naive HIV-infected adults with C-C chemokine receptor type 5-tropic virus Thompson, Melanie Saag, Michael DeJesus, Edwin Gathe, Joseph Lalezari, Jay Landay, Alan L. Cade, Jerry Enejosa, Jeffrey Lefebvre, Eric Feinberg, Judith AIDS Clinical Science OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, safety, and anti-inflammatory effects of cenicriviroc (CVC), an oral, once-daily C-C chemokine receptor types 5 and 2 antagonist, with those of efavirenz (EFV) in treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected adults. DESIGN: A 48-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy phase 2b trial at 43 institutions (USA and Puerto Rico). METHODS: Study participants (HIV-1 RNA ≥1000 copies/ml, CD4(+) cell count ≥200 cells/μl, C-C chemokine receptor type 5-tropic virus) were randomized 2 : 2 : 1 to CVC 100 mg (CVC100), CVC 200 mg (CVC200), or EFV 600 mg, each administered with emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Key end points were virologic success (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml) at week 24 (primary) and week 48 (secondary), safety/tolerability at weeks 24 and 48. Study sites and patients remained blinded until week 48. RESULTS: A total of 143 patients were randomized (CVC100, n = 59; CVC200, n = 56; EFV, n = 28). Virologic success was obtained at week 24 in 76, 73, and 71% of study participants for CVC100, CVC200, and EFV, respectively (all P > 0.05 versus EFV), and at week 48 in 68, 64, and 50%, respectively (all P > 0.05 versus EFV). Resistance mutations emerged in five and zero CVC and EFV-treated study participants, respectively. Virologic nonresponse and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance decreased when CVC minimum plasma concentration was at least 47.8 ng/ml. Treatment-related adverse events of at least grade 2 and discontinuations because of adverse events were less frequent in CVC-treated study participants. Total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased with CVC, but increased with EFV. C-C chemokine ligand type 2 (CCL2) (aka monocyte chemotactic protein-1) increased in a dose-dependent manner, whereas soluble CD14 levels decreased with CVC. CONCLUSION: CVC showed efficacy and favorable safety in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected study participants, supporting selection of CVC200 for phase 3 studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01338883. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016-03-27 2016-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4794136/ /pubmed/26636929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000000988 Text en Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Clinical Science Thompson, Melanie Saag, Michael DeJesus, Edwin Gathe, Joseph Lalezari, Jay Landay, Alan L. Cade, Jerry Enejosa, Jeffrey Lefebvre, Eric Feinberg, Judith A 48-week randomized phase 2b study evaluating cenicriviroc versus efavirenz in treatment-naive HIV-infected adults with C-C chemokine receptor type 5-tropic virus |
title | A 48-week randomized phase 2b study evaluating cenicriviroc versus efavirenz in treatment-naive HIV-infected adults with C-C chemokine receptor type 5-tropic virus |
title_full | A 48-week randomized phase 2b study evaluating cenicriviroc versus efavirenz in treatment-naive HIV-infected adults with C-C chemokine receptor type 5-tropic virus |
title_fullStr | A 48-week randomized phase 2b study evaluating cenicriviroc versus efavirenz in treatment-naive HIV-infected adults with C-C chemokine receptor type 5-tropic virus |
title_full_unstemmed | A 48-week randomized phase 2b study evaluating cenicriviroc versus efavirenz in treatment-naive HIV-infected adults with C-C chemokine receptor type 5-tropic virus |
title_short | A 48-week randomized phase 2b study evaluating cenicriviroc versus efavirenz in treatment-naive HIV-infected adults with C-C chemokine receptor type 5-tropic virus |
title_sort | 48-week randomized phase 2b study evaluating cenicriviroc versus efavirenz in treatment-naive hiv-infected adults with c-c chemokine receptor type 5-tropic virus |
topic | Clinical Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4794136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26636929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000000988 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thompsonmelanie a48weekrandomizedphase2bstudyevaluatingcenicrivirocversusefavirenzintreatmentnaivehivinfectedadultswithccchemokinereceptortype5tropicvirus AT saagmichael a48weekrandomizedphase2bstudyevaluatingcenicrivirocversusefavirenzintreatmentnaivehivinfectedadultswithccchemokinereceptortype5tropicvirus AT dejesusedwin a48weekrandomizedphase2bstudyevaluatingcenicrivirocversusefavirenzintreatmentnaivehivinfectedadultswithccchemokinereceptortype5tropicvirus AT gathejoseph a48weekrandomizedphase2bstudyevaluatingcenicrivirocversusefavirenzintreatmentnaivehivinfectedadultswithccchemokinereceptortype5tropicvirus AT lalezarijay a48weekrandomizedphase2bstudyevaluatingcenicrivirocversusefavirenzintreatmentnaivehivinfectedadultswithccchemokinereceptortype5tropicvirus AT landayalanl a48weekrandomizedphase2bstudyevaluatingcenicrivirocversusefavirenzintreatmentnaivehivinfectedadultswithccchemokinereceptortype5tropicvirus AT cadejerry a48weekrandomizedphase2bstudyevaluatingcenicrivirocversusefavirenzintreatmentnaivehivinfectedadultswithccchemokinereceptortype5tropicvirus AT enejosajeffrey a48weekrandomizedphase2bstudyevaluatingcenicrivirocversusefavirenzintreatmentnaivehivinfectedadultswithccchemokinereceptortype5tropicvirus AT lefebvreeric a48weekrandomizedphase2bstudyevaluatingcenicrivirocversusefavirenzintreatmentnaivehivinfectedadultswithccchemokinereceptortype5tropicvirus AT feinbergjudith a48weekrandomizedphase2bstudyevaluatingcenicrivirocversusefavirenzintreatmentnaivehivinfectedadultswithccchemokinereceptortype5tropicvirus AT thompsonmelanie 48weekrandomizedphase2bstudyevaluatingcenicrivirocversusefavirenzintreatmentnaivehivinfectedadultswithccchemokinereceptortype5tropicvirus AT saagmichael 48weekrandomizedphase2bstudyevaluatingcenicrivirocversusefavirenzintreatmentnaivehivinfectedadultswithccchemokinereceptortype5tropicvirus AT dejesusedwin 48weekrandomizedphase2bstudyevaluatingcenicrivirocversusefavirenzintreatmentnaivehivinfectedadultswithccchemokinereceptortype5tropicvirus AT gathejoseph 48weekrandomizedphase2bstudyevaluatingcenicrivirocversusefavirenzintreatmentnaivehivinfectedadultswithccchemokinereceptortype5tropicvirus AT lalezarijay 48weekrandomizedphase2bstudyevaluatingcenicrivirocversusefavirenzintreatmentnaivehivinfectedadultswithccchemokinereceptortype5tropicvirus AT landayalanl 48weekrandomizedphase2bstudyevaluatingcenicrivirocversusefavirenzintreatmentnaivehivinfectedadultswithccchemokinereceptortype5tropicvirus AT cadejerry 48weekrandomizedphase2bstudyevaluatingcenicrivirocversusefavirenzintreatmentnaivehivinfectedadultswithccchemokinereceptortype5tropicvirus AT enejosajeffrey 48weekrandomizedphase2bstudyevaluatingcenicrivirocversusefavirenzintreatmentnaivehivinfectedadultswithccchemokinereceptortype5tropicvirus AT lefebvreeric 48weekrandomizedphase2bstudyevaluatingcenicrivirocversusefavirenzintreatmentnaivehivinfectedadultswithccchemokinereceptortype5tropicvirus AT feinbergjudith 48weekrandomizedphase2bstudyevaluatingcenicrivirocversusefavirenzintreatmentnaivehivinfectedadultswithccchemokinereceptortype5tropicvirus |