Cargando…

Comparative Study of Three Commonly Used Methods for Hospital Efficiency Analysis in Beijing Tertiary Public Hospitals, China

BACKGROUND: Tertiary hospitals serve as the medical service center within the region and play an important role in the medical and health service system. They are also the key targets of public hospital reform in the new era in China. Through the reform of health system, the public hospital efficien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Guo-Chao, Zheng, Jian, Zhou, Zi-Jun, Zhou, Chuan-Kun, Zhao, Yang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4794884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26612294
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.170279
_version_ 1782421542117834752
author Xu, Guo-Chao
Zheng, Jian
Zhou, Zi-Jun
Zhou, Chuan-Kun
Zhao, Yang
author_facet Xu, Guo-Chao
Zheng, Jian
Zhou, Zi-Jun
Zhou, Chuan-Kun
Zhao, Yang
author_sort Xu, Guo-Chao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tertiary hospitals serve as the medical service center within the region and play an important role in the medical and health service system. They are also the key targets of public hospital reform in the new era in China. Through the reform of health system, the public hospital efficiency has changed remarkably. Therefore, this study aimed to provide some advice for efficiency assessment of public hospitals in China by comparing and analyzing the consistency of results obtained by three commonly used methods for examining hospital efficiency, that is, ratio analysis (RA), stochastic frontier analysis (SFA), and data envelopment analysis (DEA). METHODS: The theoretical basis, operational processes, and the application status of RA, SFA, and DEA were learned through literature analysis. Then, the empirical analysis was conducted based on measured data from 51 tertiary public hospitals in Beijing from 2009 to 2011. RESULTS: The average values of hospital efficiency calculated by SFA with index screening and principal component analysis (PCA) results and those calculated by DEA with index screening results were relatively stable. The efficiency of specialized hospitals was higher than that of general hospitals and that of traditional Chinese medicine hospitals. The results obtained by SFA with index screening results and the results obtained by SFA with PCA results showed a relatively high correlation (r-value in 2009, 2010, and 2011 were 0.869, 0.753, and 0.842, respectively, P < 0.01). The correlation between results obtained by DEA with index screening results and PCA results and results obtained by other methods showed statistical significance, but the correlation between results obtained by DEA with index screening results and PCA results was lower than that between results obtained by SFA with index screening results and PCA results. CONCLUSIONS: RA is not suitable for multi-index evaluation of hospital efficiency. In the given conditions, SFA is a stable efficiency analysis method. In the evaluation of hospital efficiency, DEA combined with PCA should be adopted with caution due to its poor stability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4794884
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47948842016-04-04 Comparative Study of Three Commonly Used Methods for Hospital Efficiency Analysis in Beijing Tertiary Public Hospitals, China Xu, Guo-Chao Zheng, Jian Zhou, Zi-Jun Zhou, Chuan-Kun Zhao, Yang Chin Med J (Engl) Original Article BACKGROUND: Tertiary hospitals serve as the medical service center within the region and play an important role in the medical and health service system. They are also the key targets of public hospital reform in the new era in China. Through the reform of health system, the public hospital efficiency has changed remarkably. Therefore, this study aimed to provide some advice for efficiency assessment of public hospitals in China by comparing and analyzing the consistency of results obtained by three commonly used methods for examining hospital efficiency, that is, ratio analysis (RA), stochastic frontier analysis (SFA), and data envelopment analysis (DEA). METHODS: The theoretical basis, operational processes, and the application status of RA, SFA, and DEA were learned through literature analysis. Then, the empirical analysis was conducted based on measured data from 51 tertiary public hospitals in Beijing from 2009 to 2011. RESULTS: The average values of hospital efficiency calculated by SFA with index screening and principal component analysis (PCA) results and those calculated by DEA with index screening results were relatively stable. The efficiency of specialized hospitals was higher than that of general hospitals and that of traditional Chinese medicine hospitals. The results obtained by SFA with index screening results and the results obtained by SFA with PCA results showed a relatively high correlation (r-value in 2009, 2010, and 2011 were 0.869, 0.753, and 0.842, respectively, P < 0.01). The correlation between results obtained by DEA with index screening results and PCA results and results obtained by other methods showed statistical significance, but the correlation between results obtained by DEA with index screening results and PCA results was lower than that between results obtained by SFA with index screening results and PCA results. CONCLUSIONS: RA is not suitable for multi-index evaluation of hospital efficiency. In the given conditions, SFA is a stable efficiency analysis method. In the evaluation of hospital efficiency, DEA combined with PCA should be adopted with caution due to its poor stability. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4794884/ /pubmed/26612294 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.170279 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Chinese Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Xu, Guo-Chao
Zheng, Jian
Zhou, Zi-Jun
Zhou, Chuan-Kun
Zhao, Yang
Comparative Study of Three Commonly Used Methods for Hospital Efficiency Analysis in Beijing Tertiary Public Hospitals, China
title Comparative Study of Three Commonly Used Methods for Hospital Efficiency Analysis in Beijing Tertiary Public Hospitals, China
title_full Comparative Study of Three Commonly Used Methods for Hospital Efficiency Analysis in Beijing Tertiary Public Hospitals, China
title_fullStr Comparative Study of Three Commonly Used Methods for Hospital Efficiency Analysis in Beijing Tertiary Public Hospitals, China
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study of Three Commonly Used Methods for Hospital Efficiency Analysis in Beijing Tertiary Public Hospitals, China
title_short Comparative Study of Three Commonly Used Methods for Hospital Efficiency Analysis in Beijing Tertiary Public Hospitals, China
title_sort comparative study of three commonly used methods for hospital efficiency analysis in beijing tertiary public hospitals, china
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4794884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26612294
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.170279
work_keys_str_mv AT xuguochao comparativestudyofthreecommonlyusedmethodsforhospitalefficiencyanalysisinbeijingtertiarypublichospitalschina
AT zhengjian comparativestudyofthreecommonlyusedmethodsforhospitalefficiencyanalysisinbeijingtertiarypublichospitalschina
AT zhouzijun comparativestudyofthreecommonlyusedmethodsforhospitalefficiencyanalysisinbeijingtertiarypublichospitalschina
AT zhouchuankun comparativestudyofthreecommonlyusedmethodsforhospitalefficiencyanalysisinbeijingtertiarypublichospitalschina
AT zhaoyang comparativestudyofthreecommonlyusedmethodsforhospitalefficiencyanalysisinbeijingtertiarypublichospitalschina