Cargando…

Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Phacoemulsification with Implantation of Accommodating versus Standard Monofocal Intraocular Lenses

PURPOSE: To compare distant and near visual function after cataract surgery with implantation of Crystalens HD or Tek-Clear as accommodating intraocular lenses (IOLs), versus SA60AT as a standard IOL. METHODS: The study included 62 eyes of 58 patients divided into three groups using three different...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sadoughi, Mohammad Mehdi, Einollahi, Bahram, Roshandel, Danial, Sarimohammadli, Mohammad, Feizi, Sepehr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4795385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27051480
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2008-322X.176896
_version_ 1782421600846479360
author Sadoughi, Mohammad Mehdi
Einollahi, Bahram
Roshandel, Danial
Sarimohammadli, Mohammad
Feizi, Sepehr
author_facet Sadoughi, Mohammad Mehdi
Einollahi, Bahram
Roshandel, Danial
Sarimohammadli, Mohammad
Feizi, Sepehr
author_sort Sadoughi, Mohammad Mehdi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare distant and near visual function after cataract surgery with implantation of Crystalens HD or Tek-Clear as accommodating intraocular lenses (IOLs), versus SA60AT as a standard IOL. METHODS: The study included 62 eyes of 58 patients divided into three groups using three different IOLs: Crystalens HD (Bausch and Lomb, NY, USA), Tek-Clear (Tekia, CA, USA) and SA60AT (Alcon, TX, USA) were implanted in 23, 14 and 25 eyes, respectively. Corrected distant visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected and distance corrected near visual acuities (UCNVA and DCNVA), near point of accommodation (NPA), spectacle freedom and patient satisfaction were assessed six months postoperatively and compared between the three groups. RESULTS: After 6 months, all patients showed significant improvement in CDVA with no significant difference among the study groups. However, UCNVA and DCNVA were significantly better in patients implanted with accommodating IOLs. NPA was closest in the Crystalens HD group, followed by Tek-Clear and monofocal SA60AT (P < 0.001). Patients with accommodating IOLs were more likely to become spectacle free and satisfied with their near vision as compared to subjects receiving a monofocal IOL. CONCLUSIONS: Accommodating IOLs (Crystalens HD and Tek-Clear) effectively reduce the necessity for spectacles after cataract surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4795385
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47953852016-04-05 Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Phacoemulsification with Implantation of Accommodating versus Standard Monofocal Intraocular Lenses Sadoughi, Mohammad Mehdi Einollahi, Bahram Roshandel, Danial Sarimohammadli, Mohammad Feizi, Sepehr J Ophthalmic Vis Res Original Article PURPOSE: To compare distant and near visual function after cataract surgery with implantation of Crystalens HD or Tek-Clear as accommodating intraocular lenses (IOLs), versus SA60AT as a standard IOL. METHODS: The study included 62 eyes of 58 patients divided into three groups using three different IOLs: Crystalens HD (Bausch and Lomb, NY, USA), Tek-Clear (Tekia, CA, USA) and SA60AT (Alcon, TX, USA) were implanted in 23, 14 and 25 eyes, respectively. Corrected distant visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected and distance corrected near visual acuities (UCNVA and DCNVA), near point of accommodation (NPA), spectacle freedom and patient satisfaction were assessed six months postoperatively and compared between the three groups. RESULTS: After 6 months, all patients showed significant improvement in CDVA with no significant difference among the study groups. However, UCNVA and DCNVA were significantly better in patients implanted with accommodating IOLs. NPA was closest in the Crystalens HD group, followed by Tek-Clear and monofocal SA60AT (P < 0.001). Patients with accommodating IOLs were more likely to become spectacle free and satisfied with their near vision as compared to subjects receiving a monofocal IOL. CONCLUSIONS: Accommodating IOLs (Crystalens HD and Tek-Clear) effectively reduce the necessity for spectacles after cataract surgery. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4795385/ /pubmed/27051480 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2008-322X.176896 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sadoughi, Mohammad Mehdi
Einollahi, Bahram
Roshandel, Danial
Sarimohammadli, Mohammad
Feizi, Sepehr
Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Phacoemulsification with Implantation of Accommodating versus Standard Monofocal Intraocular Lenses
title Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Phacoemulsification with Implantation of Accommodating versus Standard Monofocal Intraocular Lenses
title_full Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Phacoemulsification with Implantation of Accommodating versus Standard Monofocal Intraocular Lenses
title_fullStr Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Phacoemulsification with Implantation of Accommodating versus Standard Monofocal Intraocular Lenses
title_full_unstemmed Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Phacoemulsification with Implantation of Accommodating versus Standard Monofocal Intraocular Lenses
title_short Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Phacoemulsification with Implantation of Accommodating versus Standard Monofocal Intraocular Lenses
title_sort visual and refractive outcomes of phacoemulsification with implantation of accommodating versus standard monofocal intraocular lenses
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4795385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27051480
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2008-322X.176896
work_keys_str_mv AT sadoughimohammadmehdi visualandrefractiveoutcomesofphacoemulsificationwithimplantationofaccommodatingversusstandardmonofocalintraocularlenses
AT einollahibahram visualandrefractiveoutcomesofphacoemulsificationwithimplantationofaccommodatingversusstandardmonofocalintraocularlenses
AT roshandeldanial visualandrefractiveoutcomesofphacoemulsificationwithimplantationofaccommodatingversusstandardmonofocalintraocularlenses
AT sarimohammadlimohammad visualandrefractiveoutcomesofphacoemulsificationwithimplantationofaccommodatingversusstandardmonofocalintraocularlenses
AT feizisepehr visualandrefractiveoutcomesofphacoemulsificationwithimplantationofaccommodatingversusstandardmonofocalintraocularlenses