Cargando…

Analysis of small field percent depth dose and profiles: Comparison of measurements with various detectors and effects of detector orientation with different jaw settings

The advent of modern technologies in radiotherapy poses an increased challenge in the determination of dosimetric parameters of small fields that exhibit a high degree of uncertainty. Percent depth dose and beam profiles were acquired using different detectors in two different orientations. The para...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Godson, Henry Finlay, Ravikumar, M., Sathiyan, S., Ganesh, K. M., Ponmalar, Y. Retna, Varatharaj, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4795411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27051165
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.177284
_version_ 1782421606662930432
author Godson, Henry Finlay
Ravikumar, M.
Sathiyan, S.
Ganesh, K. M.
Ponmalar, Y. Retna
Varatharaj, C.
author_facet Godson, Henry Finlay
Ravikumar, M.
Sathiyan, S.
Ganesh, K. M.
Ponmalar, Y. Retna
Varatharaj, C.
author_sort Godson, Henry Finlay
collection PubMed
description The advent of modern technologies in radiotherapy poses an increased challenge in the determination of dosimetric parameters of small fields that exhibit a high degree of uncertainty. Percent depth dose and beam profiles were acquired using different detectors in two different orientations. The parameters such as relative surface dose (D(S)), depth of dose maximum (D(max)), percentage dose at 10 cm (D(10)), penumbral width, flatness, and symmetry were evaluated with different detectors. The dosimetric data were acquired for fields defined by jaws alone, multileaf collimator (MLC) alone, and by MLC while the jaws were positioned at 0, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 cm away from MLC leaf-end using a Varian linear accelerator with 6 MV photon beam. The accuracy in the measurement of dosimetric parameters with various detectors for three different field definitions was evaluated. The relative D(S)(38.1%) with photon field diode in parallel orientation was higher than electron field diode (EFD) (27.9%) values for 1 cm ×1 cm field. An overestimation of 5.7% and 8.6% in D(10) depth were observed for 1 cm ×1 cm field with RK ion chamber in parallel and perpendicular orientation, respectively, for the fields defined by MLC while jaw positioned at the edge of the field when compared to EFD values in parallel orientation. For this field definition, the in-plane penumbral widths obtained with ion chamber in parallel and perpendicular orientation were 3.9 mm, 5.6 mm for 1 cm ×1 cm field, respectively. Among all detectors used in the study, the unshielded diodes were found to be an appropriate choice of detector for the measurement of beam parameters in small fields.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4795411
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47954112016-04-05 Analysis of small field percent depth dose and profiles: Comparison of measurements with various detectors and effects of detector orientation with different jaw settings Godson, Henry Finlay Ravikumar, M. Sathiyan, S. Ganesh, K. M. Ponmalar, Y. Retna Varatharaj, C. J Med Phys Original Article The advent of modern technologies in radiotherapy poses an increased challenge in the determination of dosimetric parameters of small fields that exhibit a high degree of uncertainty. Percent depth dose and beam profiles were acquired using different detectors in two different orientations. The parameters such as relative surface dose (D(S)), depth of dose maximum (D(max)), percentage dose at 10 cm (D(10)), penumbral width, flatness, and symmetry were evaluated with different detectors. The dosimetric data were acquired for fields defined by jaws alone, multileaf collimator (MLC) alone, and by MLC while the jaws were positioned at 0, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 cm away from MLC leaf-end using a Varian linear accelerator with 6 MV photon beam. The accuracy in the measurement of dosimetric parameters with various detectors for three different field definitions was evaluated. The relative D(S)(38.1%) with photon field diode in parallel orientation was higher than electron field diode (EFD) (27.9%) values for 1 cm ×1 cm field. An overestimation of 5.7% and 8.6% in D(10) depth were observed for 1 cm ×1 cm field with RK ion chamber in parallel and perpendicular orientation, respectively, for the fields defined by MLC while jaw positioned at the edge of the field when compared to EFD values in parallel orientation. For this field definition, the in-plane penumbral widths obtained with ion chamber in parallel and perpendicular orientation were 3.9 mm, 5.6 mm for 1 cm ×1 cm field, respectively. Among all detectors used in the study, the unshielded diodes were found to be an appropriate choice of detector for the measurement of beam parameters in small fields. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4795411/ /pubmed/27051165 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.177284 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Godson, Henry Finlay
Ravikumar, M.
Sathiyan, S.
Ganesh, K. M.
Ponmalar, Y. Retna
Varatharaj, C.
Analysis of small field percent depth dose and profiles: Comparison of measurements with various detectors and effects of detector orientation with different jaw settings
title Analysis of small field percent depth dose and profiles: Comparison of measurements with various detectors and effects of detector orientation with different jaw settings
title_full Analysis of small field percent depth dose and profiles: Comparison of measurements with various detectors and effects of detector orientation with different jaw settings
title_fullStr Analysis of small field percent depth dose and profiles: Comparison of measurements with various detectors and effects of detector orientation with different jaw settings
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of small field percent depth dose and profiles: Comparison of measurements with various detectors and effects of detector orientation with different jaw settings
title_short Analysis of small field percent depth dose and profiles: Comparison of measurements with various detectors and effects of detector orientation with different jaw settings
title_sort analysis of small field percent depth dose and profiles: comparison of measurements with various detectors and effects of detector orientation with different jaw settings
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4795411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27051165
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.177284
work_keys_str_mv AT godsonhenryfinlay analysisofsmallfieldpercentdepthdoseandprofilescomparisonofmeasurementswithvariousdetectorsandeffectsofdetectororientationwithdifferentjawsettings
AT ravikumarm analysisofsmallfieldpercentdepthdoseandprofilescomparisonofmeasurementswithvariousdetectorsandeffectsofdetectororientationwithdifferentjawsettings
AT sathiyans analysisofsmallfieldpercentdepthdoseandprofilescomparisonofmeasurementswithvariousdetectorsandeffectsofdetectororientationwithdifferentjawsettings
AT ganeshkm analysisofsmallfieldpercentdepthdoseandprofilescomparisonofmeasurementswithvariousdetectorsandeffectsofdetectororientationwithdifferentjawsettings
AT ponmalaryretna analysisofsmallfieldpercentdepthdoseandprofilescomparisonofmeasurementswithvariousdetectorsandeffectsofdetectororientationwithdifferentjawsettings
AT varatharajc analysisofsmallfieldpercentdepthdoseandprofilescomparisonofmeasurementswithvariousdetectorsandeffectsofdetectororientationwithdifferentjawsettings