Cargando…

Enhancement of Visual Field Predictions with Pointwise Exponential Regression (PER) and Pointwise Linear Regression (PLR)

PURPOSE: The study was conducted to evaluate threshold smoothing algorithms to enhance prediction of the rates of visual field (VF) worsening in glaucoma. METHODS: We studied 798 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and 6 or more years of follow-up who underwent 8 or more VF examinations. Thres...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morales, Esteban, de Leon, John Mark S., Abdollahi, Niloufar, Yu, Fei, Nouri-Mahdavi, Kouros, Caprioli, Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4795587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26998405
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.5.2.12
_version_ 1782421626017546240
author Morales, Esteban
de Leon, John Mark S.
Abdollahi, Niloufar
Yu, Fei
Nouri-Mahdavi, Kouros
Caprioli, Joseph
author_facet Morales, Esteban
de Leon, John Mark S.
Abdollahi, Niloufar
Yu, Fei
Nouri-Mahdavi, Kouros
Caprioli, Joseph
author_sort Morales, Esteban
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The study was conducted to evaluate threshold smoothing algorithms to enhance prediction of the rates of visual field (VF) worsening in glaucoma. METHODS: We studied 798 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and 6 or more years of follow-up who underwent 8 or more VF examinations. Thresholds at each VF location for the first 4 years or first half of the follow-up time (whichever was greater) were smoothed with clusters defined by the nearest neighbor (NN), Garway-Heath, Glaucoma Hemifield Test (GHT), and weighting by the correlation of rates at all other VF locations. Thresholds were regressed with a pointwise exponential regression (PER) model and a pointwise linear regression (PLR) model. Smaller root mean square error (RMSE) values of the differences between the observed and the predicted thresholds at last two follow-ups indicated better model predictions. RESULTS: The mean (SD) follow-up times for the smoothing and prediction phase were 5.3 (1.5) and 10.5 (3.9) years. The mean RMSE values for the PER and PLR models were unsmoothed data, 6.09 and 6.55; NN, 3.40 and 3.42; Garway-Heath, 3.47 and 3.48; GHT, 3.57 and 3.74; and correlation of rates, 3.59 and 3.64. CONCLUSIONS: Smoothed VF data predicted better than unsmoothed data. Nearest neighbor provided the best predictions; PER also predicted consistently more accurately than PLR. Smoothing algorithms should be used when forecasting VF results with PER or PLR. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The application of smoothing algorithms on VF data can improve forecasting in VF points to assist in treatment decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4795587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47955872016-03-18 Enhancement of Visual Field Predictions with Pointwise Exponential Regression (PER) and Pointwise Linear Regression (PLR) Morales, Esteban de Leon, John Mark S. Abdollahi, Niloufar Yu, Fei Nouri-Mahdavi, Kouros Caprioli, Joseph Transl Vis Sci Technol Articles PURPOSE: The study was conducted to evaluate threshold smoothing algorithms to enhance prediction of the rates of visual field (VF) worsening in glaucoma. METHODS: We studied 798 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and 6 or more years of follow-up who underwent 8 or more VF examinations. Thresholds at each VF location for the first 4 years or first half of the follow-up time (whichever was greater) were smoothed with clusters defined by the nearest neighbor (NN), Garway-Heath, Glaucoma Hemifield Test (GHT), and weighting by the correlation of rates at all other VF locations. Thresholds were regressed with a pointwise exponential regression (PER) model and a pointwise linear regression (PLR) model. Smaller root mean square error (RMSE) values of the differences between the observed and the predicted thresholds at last two follow-ups indicated better model predictions. RESULTS: The mean (SD) follow-up times for the smoothing and prediction phase were 5.3 (1.5) and 10.5 (3.9) years. The mean RMSE values for the PER and PLR models were unsmoothed data, 6.09 and 6.55; NN, 3.40 and 3.42; Garway-Heath, 3.47 and 3.48; GHT, 3.57 and 3.74; and correlation of rates, 3.59 and 3.64. CONCLUSIONS: Smoothed VF data predicted better than unsmoothed data. Nearest neighbor provided the best predictions; PER also predicted consistently more accurately than PLR. Smoothing algorithms should be used when forecasting VF results with PER or PLR. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The application of smoothing algorithms on VF data can improve forecasting in VF points to assist in treatment decisions. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2016-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4795587/ /pubmed/26998405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.5.2.12 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Articles
Morales, Esteban
de Leon, John Mark S.
Abdollahi, Niloufar
Yu, Fei
Nouri-Mahdavi, Kouros
Caprioli, Joseph
Enhancement of Visual Field Predictions with Pointwise Exponential Regression (PER) and Pointwise Linear Regression (PLR)
title Enhancement of Visual Field Predictions with Pointwise Exponential Regression (PER) and Pointwise Linear Regression (PLR)
title_full Enhancement of Visual Field Predictions with Pointwise Exponential Regression (PER) and Pointwise Linear Regression (PLR)
title_fullStr Enhancement of Visual Field Predictions with Pointwise Exponential Regression (PER) and Pointwise Linear Regression (PLR)
title_full_unstemmed Enhancement of Visual Field Predictions with Pointwise Exponential Regression (PER) and Pointwise Linear Regression (PLR)
title_short Enhancement of Visual Field Predictions with Pointwise Exponential Regression (PER) and Pointwise Linear Regression (PLR)
title_sort enhancement of visual field predictions with pointwise exponential regression (per) and pointwise linear regression (plr)
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4795587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26998405
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.5.2.12
work_keys_str_mv AT moralesesteban enhancementofvisualfieldpredictionswithpointwiseexponentialregressionperandpointwiselinearregressionplr
AT deleonjohnmarks enhancementofvisualfieldpredictionswithpointwiseexponentialregressionperandpointwiselinearregressionplr
AT abdollahiniloufar enhancementofvisualfieldpredictionswithpointwiseexponentialregressionperandpointwiselinearregressionplr
AT yufei enhancementofvisualfieldpredictionswithpointwiseexponentialregressionperandpointwiselinearregressionplr
AT nourimahdavikouros enhancementofvisualfieldpredictionswithpointwiseexponentialregressionperandpointwiselinearregressionplr
AT capriolijoseph enhancementofvisualfieldpredictionswithpointwiseexponentialregressionperandpointwiselinearregressionplr