Cargando…

Functional performance of school children diagnosed with developmental delay up to two years of age

OBJECTIVE: To compare the functional performance of students diagnosed with developmental delay (DD) up to two years of age with peers exhibiting typical development. METHODS: Cross-sectional study with functional performance assessment of children diagnosed with DD up to two years of age compared t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dornelas, Lílian de Fátima, Magalhães, Lívia de Castro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade de Pediatria de São Paulo 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4795725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26553573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rppede.2015.10.001
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To compare the functional performance of students diagnosed with developmental delay (DD) up to two years of age with peers exhibiting typical development. METHODS: Cross-sectional study with functional performance assessment of children diagnosed with DD up to two years of age compared to those with typical development at seven to eight years of age. Each group consisted of 45 children, selected by non-random sampling, evaluated for motor skills, quality of home environment, school participation and performance. ANOVA and the Binomial test for two proportions were used to assess differences between groups. RESULTS: The group with DD had lower motor skills when compared to the typical group. While 66.7% of children in the typical group showed adequate school participation, receiving aid in cognitive and behavioral tasks similar to that offered to other children at the same level, only 22.2% of children with DD showed the same performance. Although 53.3% of the children with DD achieved an academic performance expected for the school level, there were limitations in some activities. Only two indicators of family environment, diversity and activities with parents at home, showed statistically significant difference between the groups, with advantage being shown for the typical group. CONCLUSIONS: Children with DD have persistent difficulties at school age, with motor deficit, restrictions in school activity performance and low participation in the school context, as well as significantly lower functional performance when compared to children without DD. A systematic monitoring of this population is recommended to identify needs and minimize future problems.