Cargando…

Liking versus Complexity: Decomposing the Inverted U-curve

The relationship between liking and stimulus complexity is commonly reported to follow an inverted U-curve. However, large individual differences among complexity preferences of participants have frequently been observed since the earliest studies on the topic. The common use of across-participant a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Güçlütürk, Yağmur, Jacobs, Richard H. A. H., van Lier, Rob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4796011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27047359
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00112
_version_ 1782421693932765184
author Güçlütürk, Yağmur
Jacobs, Richard H. A. H.
van Lier, Rob
author_facet Güçlütürk, Yağmur
Jacobs, Richard H. A. H.
van Lier, Rob
author_sort Güçlütürk, Yağmur
collection PubMed
description The relationship between liking and stimulus complexity is commonly reported to follow an inverted U-curve. However, large individual differences among complexity preferences of participants have frequently been observed since the earliest studies on the topic. The common use of across-participant analysis methods that ignore these large individual differences in aesthetic preferences gives an impression of high agreement between individuals. In this study, we collected ratings of liking and perceived complexity from 30 participants for a set of digitally generated grayscale images. In addition, we calculated an objective measure of complexity for each image. Our results reveal that the inverted U-curve relationship between liking and stimulus complexity comes about as the combination of different individual liking functions. Specifically, after automatically clustering the participants based on their liking ratings, we determined that one group of participants in our sample had increasingly lower liking ratings for increasingly more complex stimuli, while a second group of participants had increasingly higher liking ratings for increasingly more complex stimuli. Based on our findings, we call for a focus on the individual differences in aesthetic preferences, adoption of alternative analysis methods that would account for these differences and a re-evaluation of established rules of human aesthetic preferences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4796011
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47960112016-04-04 Liking versus Complexity: Decomposing the Inverted U-curve Güçlütürk, Yağmur Jacobs, Richard H. A. H. van Lier, Rob Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience The relationship between liking and stimulus complexity is commonly reported to follow an inverted U-curve. However, large individual differences among complexity preferences of participants have frequently been observed since the earliest studies on the topic. The common use of across-participant analysis methods that ignore these large individual differences in aesthetic preferences gives an impression of high agreement between individuals. In this study, we collected ratings of liking and perceived complexity from 30 participants for a set of digitally generated grayscale images. In addition, we calculated an objective measure of complexity for each image. Our results reveal that the inverted U-curve relationship between liking and stimulus complexity comes about as the combination of different individual liking functions. Specifically, after automatically clustering the participants based on their liking ratings, we determined that one group of participants in our sample had increasingly lower liking ratings for increasingly more complex stimuli, while a second group of participants had increasingly higher liking ratings for increasingly more complex stimuli. Based on our findings, we call for a focus on the individual differences in aesthetic preferences, adoption of alternative analysis methods that would account for these differences and a re-evaluation of established rules of human aesthetic preferences. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4796011/ /pubmed/27047359 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00112 Text en Copyright © 2016 Güçlütürk, Jacobs and van Lier. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Güçlütürk, Yağmur
Jacobs, Richard H. A. H.
van Lier, Rob
Liking versus Complexity: Decomposing the Inverted U-curve
title Liking versus Complexity: Decomposing the Inverted U-curve
title_full Liking versus Complexity: Decomposing the Inverted U-curve
title_fullStr Liking versus Complexity: Decomposing the Inverted U-curve
title_full_unstemmed Liking versus Complexity: Decomposing the Inverted U-curve
title_short Liking versus Complexity: Decomposing the Inverted U-curve
title_sort liking versus complexity: decomposing the inverted u-curve
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4796011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27047359
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00112
work_keys_str_mv AT gucluturkyagmur likingversuscomplexitydecomposingtheinverteducurve
AT jacobsrichardhah likingversuscomplexitydecomposingtheinverteducurve
AT vanlierrob likingversuscomplexitydecomposingtheinverteducurve